Because there was a case to be made, but if he starts doing stuff like this today, then what’s the pointAnd you keep lying to yourself Remco can beat him in classics or Vingegaard will win the Tour. Those are just wishful thinkings.
Because there was a case to be made, but if he starts doing stuff like this today, then what’s the pointAnd you keep lying to yourself Remco can beat him in classics or Vingegaard will win the Tour. Those are just wishful thinkings.
Buddy, I don't know what cycling have you been watching but he does stuff like today on a daily basis since 2024.Because there was a case to be made, but if he starts doing stuff like this today, then what’s the point
Mate it's been like this for 2 years. He pissed all over cycling in 2024. I'm just grateful he didnt show to the giro this yearI’m close to being done with any race he participates in
Fair enough, but for me it looked suspicious even that time and the PDBF with Gianetti in the team sealed it for me. This past two years have only been the icing on the cake. I stick to my point it was a lot easier to like Bertie. Now it's like supporting froomie with pog all those years🙏🏼I'm a big fan of Pogacar since he won the last mountain stage in the Vuelta (I notice him when he won Tour de l'Avenir and specially Volta ao Algarve but in the Vuelta he conquered me). So no, I'm a fan before his rise to be honest.
I'm a big fan of Pogacar since he won the last mountain stage in the Vuelta (I notice him when he won Tour de l'Avenir and specially Volta ao Algarve but in the Vuelta he conquered me). So no, I'm a fan before his rise to be honest.
Yeah, and first there was the idea that he wasn’t able to do such a thing a whole season. Also riding like this wasn’t in 2024, never showed to be such a good time trialist. Why not ride WC ITT then, he could’ve won itBuddy, I don't know what cycling have you been watching but he does stuff like today on a daily basis since 2024.
empty words...
No, he can't beat Remco or Ganna on a flat TT. A hilly? Of course but I think he doesn't care. He already showed monster performances on flat courses in the Tour. People (including you) forget the Tour is the highest peak of Pogacar. What he shows in April, September are mini peaks, but nothing close to his Tour shape.Yeah, and first there was the idea that he wasn’t able to do such a thing a whole season. Also riding like this wasn’t in 2024, never showed to be such a good time trialist. Why not ride WC ITT then, he could’ve won it
Yeah, and first there was the idea that he wasn’t able to do such a thing a whole season. Also riding like this wasn’t in 2024, never showed to be such a good time trialist. Why not ride WC ITT then, he could’ve won it
It's called connecting the knots. The same how I knew that Lance was on a superior program and protection back in the days. Simple actually, when something considering the facts/team/manager is too good to be true, it usually is just that. There's a sentence for all this: "I am sorry you can't believe in miracles" yes I can't 🤌🙏🏼How do you know Pogačar is ‘way worse in the cheating part than Lance ever was?’
No.
No. No I’m not. The gap to Remco at the end, on that type of course, was scandalously small. Pas normal as the French would say.
Motor doping is just stupid and even if it's a reality, only Pogacar uses it? Please...I expected something like 30-40 secs on a flattish course......
However, call me naive, but I honestly think he's just a physiological freak - and not anything else. If I'm wrong, then I'll hold my hands up......
Was Ulrich a doper when he beat Armstrong in that TT back in the 03 Tour?Yesterday the theme in here was that he is motor-doping and today the theme is that he is doping more than Lance, except he didn't even win todays stage, Remco did. What does this say about Remco, is he also a doper?
Only issue is if Pogacar is motor doping and the only one doing it, the times when Pogacar is beaten or ridden close to by Vingegaard what the heck is he on.Was Ulrich a doper when he beat Armstrong in that TT back in the 03 Tour?
C'mon man, this is professional cycling...most everyone is looking for an edge. Lol.
I understand you, then we put every rider accountable, I'm just against this biased witch-hunt towards 1 single rider (even when he doesn't win) when it's likely that everyone is taking performance enhancers.Was Ulrich a doper when he beat Armstrong in that TT back in the 03 Tour?
C'mon man, this is professional cycling...most everyone is looking for an edge. Lol.
Maybe if you compare his results to any other rider you will understand why he is scrutinized the most.I understand you, then we put every rider accountable, I'm just against this biased witch-hunt towards 1 single rider (even when he doesn't win) when it's likely that everyone is taking performance enhancers.
Because he pushes watts Lance wouldn't even have on his Y-axis when drawing graphs of his training output.
All the Hayters keep hating, that's what they do.All the apologists for Pogacar can give us any amount of excuses and explanations for Pogacar’s performance levels. Superior genetics. Superior training. Superior feeding strategies (lol). Zone 2. Seated attack yoga techniques. Yada yada yada. It can all be used to justify, in some people’s eyes, the most ridiculous, credulity busting performances. However, nothing he does will ever remove the stain represented by his affiliation with Mauro Gianetti. No amount of brilliant white sports washing (copyright UAE) will ever take it away. Every win, every performance will have to be accompanied with that huge asterisk. And with it the eternal doubt that any of it was real.
Absolutely, but he'll end up loosing huge time to Pogacar in the mountains. Remco will have a bad day where he looses minutes, something Pog hasn't had for about two years.Yesterday the theme in here was that he is motor-doping and today the theme is that he is doping more than Lance, except he didn't even win todays stage, Remco did. What does this say about Remco, is he also a doper?
Is there anyone else dominating all year around in every road cycling discipline?I understand you, then we put every rider accountable, I'm just against this biased witch-hunt towards 1 single rider (even when he doesn't win) when it's likely that everyone is taking performance enhancers.
Interesting question. Let me ask a more relevant one. Why did the best time trialist in the world, who has dominated this discipline since his junior years beat the guy who showed very little ITT talent until he signed for the dirtiest duo in cycling, by such a small margin?Yesterday the theme in here was that he is motor-doping and today the theme is that he is doping more than Lance, except he didn't even win todays stage, Remco did. What does this say about Remco, is he also a doper?