Tadej Pogacar and Mauro Giannetti

Page 527 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 27, 2022
1,472
2,585
10,180
The thing is with Hatch etc. they're between a rock and a hard place. Most of them are self employed so why would they start shouting the odds? Plus they do that and they're open to liable stuff.
The problem is doping just isn't mentioned anymore, like it doesn't exist. Lance and team Sky were hammered for years for far more human performances compared to Pog.
 
May 27, 2022
1,472
2,585
10,180
We've been seeing this obscenity almost weekly for years now.
This goes beyond any cyclist who's been caught or has been cheating.
And no one asks: what has to happen for journalists and the media to take a stand against him? Does he have to ride a 500cc?
Unfortunately in 2026, you aren't allowed to question the mainstream natative. Would love to have a David Wash or Paul Kimmage.
 
Apr 1, 2026
38
64
180
Why credit to Seixas though? I'm pretty sure in a couple of years everyone is going to be extremely bored of him winning everything.
Just for being the "new kid on the block" delivering such a fantastic performance.
I suspect it will take quite a lot for him to even start bothering Pogi consistently, but we shall see. Time will tell if he can actually reach the ridiculous levels of dominance we see in Pogi.
 
May 9, 2025
587
872
3,280
Just for being the "new kid on the block" delivering such a fantastic performance.
I suspect it will take quite a lot for him to even start bothering Pogi consistently, but we shall see. Time will tell if he can actually reach the ridiculous levels of dominance we see in Pogi.

At least he was a prodigy at a young age. And he’s doing this while on a French team under French laws. Much more believable.
 
Feb 27, 2023
790
940
6,180
The problem is doping just isn't mentioned anymore, like it doesn't exist. Lance and team Sky were hammered for years for far more human performances compared to Pog.
The difference is that people knew exactly what Lance was doing. Everybody who was not blind knew about EPO, about blood transfusion, testosterone and what not. Can you point out to what they are doing nowadays?
 
Sep 15, 2016
350
236
9,680
The difference is that people knew exactly what Lance was doing. Everybody who was not blind knew about EPO, about blood transfusion, testosterone and what not. Can you point out to what they are doing nowadays?
Well, probably EPO, blood transfusions and testosterone for starters, there's still quite a bit of wiggle room to get away with it. On top of that? Synthetic hemoglobin or other novel blood manipulations techniques (like siRNA targeting EGLN/PHD), HGH/IGF-1,... i could go on and on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MountainGoatW
Apr 20, 2016
783
3,323
15,680
WADA has become more proficient at detecting EPO microdosing. Blood transfusions easily trip the ABP (the ABP is very sensitive to transfusions - that was it's main purpose when it was designed back in 2008).

On testosterone, the CIRC test can detect even very small amounts of synthetic testosterone (the test can distinguish between natural occurring cholesterol-based testosterone vs plant-based derived synthetic testosterone). No need to rely on the old-fashioned T/E ration test which sets a limit of 4:1 T/E ratio for a positive. Plus there's the ABP steroid module that'll pick up small amounts of anabolic steroids even the compounds with short glow times.

IMO, I just don't see how biological doping can be used effectively these days unless teams/riders are paying off authorities to look the other way?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cookster15
IMO, I just don't see how biological doping can be used effectively these days unless teams/riders are paying off authorities to look the other way?

Well, it took 8 years for biological doping to snare Juan José Cobo after he beat Froome at the 2011 Vuelta? The ABP is too slow IMO. Ben Johnson was caught within 3 days of "winning" the 1988 Olympic 100 metre race. A 3 day turnaround for blood doping would be a much better deterrent in pro cycling and other endurance based sports.

I think the issue is samples are compared to a riders historical results (the passport) and a software red flags any anomalies. Those anomalies are then looked at by a team of qualified persons. If judged to be beyond reasonable doubt an adverse finding is found. While it might be scientifically sound, it is certainly takes more time to prove to courts than a simple synthetic EPO or anabolic steroids test.

But if Pogacar does have an unfair advantage I think blood manipulation is much more likely than motors as keeps popping up here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ColonelKidneyBeans
Apr 8, 2026
16
49
80
It is a clownshow these days 🤡💉🔋and then they are rubbing it on our faces with Dracula-Gianetti celebrating on the finnish line. Like seriously nobody asks questions these days🤡like the guy how was talented, but not generational keeps winning everything and in all terrain. Every win these days come with an asteriks. I guess it is the UCI and UAE connection, money talks and *** walks.
 
Sep 15, 2016
350
236
9,680
WADA has become more proficient at detecting EPO microdosing. Blood transfusions easily trip the ABP (the ABP is very sensitive to transfusions - that was it's main purpose when it was designed back in 2008).

On testosterone, the CIRC test can detect even very small amounts of synthetic testosterone (the test can distinguish between natural occurring cholesterol-based testosterone vs plant-based derived synthetic testosterone). No need to rely on the old-fashioned T/E ration test which sets a limit of 4:1 T/E ratio for a positive. Plus there's the ABP steroid module that'll pick up small amounts of anabolic steroids even the compounds with short glow times.

IMO, I just don't see how biological doping can be used effectively these days unless teams/riders are paying off authorities to look the other way?
The ABP is pretty good in theory, but how well does it work in practice? Kreuziger got out of a sanction, there's plenty of scientific literature criticising it, we've seen the highly suspicious self published blood values of Horner from the 2013 Vuelta remain unsanctioned, Juanjo Cobo as mentionned above...
It only applies to the pros too, so you could try to establish an artificially high baseline on younger athletes by using blood doping before they are enrolled.

Regarding testosterone, afaik the isotope ratio test is not used routinely because it's expensive, it's more of a "smoking gun" when suspicions are high because of a high T/E ratio or of anomalies in the steroid module.
 
Jul 19, 2024
135
300
1,530
I tend to think that the bigger issue here, is the sponsor itself. How can you compete against one of the richest oil countries? Every other cycling team have to fight to attract and maintain sponsors that may choose to leave early and have limited budgets (even the bigger ones). Gianetti picks up the phone and asks for another check. This can buy you the best riders, equipment, support (technical and medical) and influence.
I get it that it's always been the case, not just in cycling, but this takes it to a whole new level. They are going after Seixas now, in the end every major race will be contested among their riders only, noone else will have a chance.
The UCI should think about imposing some sort of budget or salary cap. Not that I expect them to do that, they are gorging themselves on UAE money too
 
Feb 27, 2023
790
940
6,180
Well, probably EPO, blood transfusions and testosterone for starters, there's still quite a bit of wiggle room to get away with it. On top of that? Synthetic hemoglobin or other novel blood manipulations techniques (like siRNA targeting EGLN/PHD), HGH/IGF-1,... i could go on and on.
It is not quite the same now is it? For example in 98 there was the Festina scandal (not that people did not have concrete evidence before). Nowadays it is all speculation, nobody has been caught with anything. Now you might say this or that but these are the facts.
 
Mar 19, 2009
3,862
4,116
19,180
It is not quite the same now is it? For example in 98 there was the Festina scandal (not that people did not have concrete evidence before). Nowadays it is all speculation, nobody has been caught with anything. Now you might say this or that but these are the facts.

There are almost no positives, and hardly any cases of anyone being busted with PEDs. So it's the perfect moment to look away and market the sport as clean once again. There is very little incentive I fear, to change anything about it, beause the last time was a catastrophe for the sport in terms of attention, sponsors, teams, races etc.
But you are not wrong. Almost all we have are plausibility arguments and historical comparisons or actors to point to.
 

TRENDING THREADS