1. Pro cycling has a dirty past. No amount of stripping of titles or revisionism can change that fact. One hundred plus years of corruption and cheating.
2. No one benefits if they strip Pantani. No one.
ASO can't recoup its prize money. Even if they did, they wouldn't have a clue who merits receiving it. No one will inherit the title.
They can issue a lifetime ban from further racing against Pantani but, as his lifetime already has ended, he immediately would be eligible to race again if he so chooses.
It would not change the fact that Ullrich's fans were robbed of the thrill of cheering for their man in the moment.
Regardless how much you might wish for it, it would not contribute to any collapse of the UCI, nor to the dethronement of Fat Pat. The matter of the departure of Hein Verbruggen and associated regime change forever will serve as an impenetrable firewall to that fantasy.
The typical cycling fan's head still is reeling from the Pharmstrong affair. He will not understand that stripping Pantani is necessary to ensure the sport is fully cleansed. He will not understand that this took place under the previous management. He only will understand this sport cannot manage its internal affairs, and has fallen into disrepute. And since cyclists still regularly get popped for doping, he sees little evidence the sport yet is clean.
3. The problem with regicide is that, once you have commenced the killing, it is difficult to know when to stop. The French of all people should be aware of this. In the world of pro cycling, stripping a TdF winner of his title is tantamount to killing one of the kings of the sport.
It is possible that every winner of the TdF prior to 1967 took prohibited substances. Certainly by 1904, the prospective riders all understood what a diabolical route that sadist HDG had in store for them. And since there then were no enforcement efforts, they all of them certainly at least would have considered it. Granted, their "PEDs" were not so much performance enhancers as they were fatigue ameliorators, but they were prohibited substances, just the same.
There were at least as many riders who claimed they saw Charly Gaul take amphetamines as those who testified they saw Lance Amrstrong self-administering prohibited substances. Anquetil and Coppi both freely admitted (after the fact) to taking prohibited substances. You cannot rationally support the stripping of Pantani without also favouring the stripping of these three. And of every other pre-enforcement rider who made the offhand confession.
A great sport needs heroes. If it has no heroes, that only can mean there was no heroism in its past. Therefore it cannot be a great sport. If you kill all of cycling's heroes, it ceases to be a great sport, and that is an injury it could not recover from for a further 110 years. Pro cycling already has killed its greatest king, perhaps the greatest it ever will know. That should be killing enough for one scandal. Why? See #4, below.
4. Cycling fans deserve better. What is the point of taking the effort to watch a race, particularly in person, if the man you see winning, five years hence, proves not to have been the winner after all? It took more than two years to find out who won in 2006. And nearly as long again in 2010. That is absurd. And disrespectful of the fans.
I hardly would pass for a fan of NASCAR motor racing but they have one rule that makes perfect sense. The man who won the race, won the race. Forever. There is ZERO chance that fans will awake on the morning after the race, switch on the telly and learn the man they saw winning just the day before no longer is the winner. ZERO chance.
The winner might be fined, he might be suspended, he might be out-and-out banned, but regardless, he still will be the winner. Ultimately, the fans pay everyone in the sport's salaries, and they deserve at least that much consideration.
5. Sometimes it seems cycling is intent on committing the suicide of a thousand cuts. Its image only can endure so much battering and remain viable. And it will be another 10-15 years, when today's children enter the sport, before we can take full measure of the damage done by the Pharmstrong era.
So enough with the killing already. Let the healing begin. By all means, deal with future violations as need arises, but let the past be the past, while pro cycling and Le Tour still have a past worthy of celebration.