Caruut said:In the Giro: 4 high-mountain summit finishes, 3 medium-mountain summit finishes and 39km of ITT
In the Tour: 3 MTFs, 100km of TT
Was meaning not the parcour's but the level of competition"
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Caruut said:In the Giro: 4 high-mountain summit finishes, 3 medium-mountain summit finishes and 39km of ITT
In the Tour: 3 MTFs, 100km of TT
karlboss said:***** No one deserves 5 stars at this point, 5 stars would be for Armstrong or Contador types
**** Nibali, Schleck, Menchov, Wiggins, Sanchez, Evans
*** Leipheimer, other RSNT,
** Mollema, JVDB, Valverde
* some other folk.
If Leipheimer hadn't crashed he could well be on 4* being OPQS and all.
Pretty open IMO.
greenedge said:Vino exceeds realistic views of course so he shall also be counted.
Also who is this Wiggons guy everyone speaks of?happychappy said:No Giro for Vino this year, route too easy.
killswitch said:Also who is this Wiggons guy everyone speaks of?
karlboss said:tendonitis in the menchov thread, taken from katusha site. http://www.katushateam.com/2012/eng/main.php?mod=news&m=4&n=1590
The Hitch said:How will that affect his tour prep ?
karlboss said:Tendonitis is kind of non descript, it depends on were and how severe. Anything from no problem to out of the tour.
The Hitch said:I see.
When was the last news? He pulled out of Romandie 2 weeks ago, anyone hear of any updates since?
Angulo said:Please don't forget that Evans is 35 now.He already was the oldest winner of the last 40 years. So I don't believe he can keep his form for 3 weeks at this age.
Menchov is 34. Men in my country are known to decline early. So he is too old for the win.
Sanchez is 34 and he was not good in 2011 Grand tours. May be he can but he is not the best climber and not the best TT.
Wiggins? He never was good in the mountains. He lost EVERY stage in the mountains in GT to the favourites.
Andy Schleck lost 2001 TDF because he worked for Franck and lost about 2 minutes because of it. And remember that he is now with Bruyneel and he will be stronger than ever because of excellent doping system of Bruyneel. He will get his win.
Nibali will be second and hope Menchov will be 3rd. Van den Broeck 4th and Cadel 5th.
karlboss said:***** No one deserves 5 stars at this point, 5 stars would be for Armstrong or Contador types
**** Nibali, Schleck, Menchov, Wiggins, Sanchez, Evans
*** Leipheimer, other RSNT,
** Mollema, JVDB, Valverde
* some other folk.
If Leipheimer hadn't crashed he could well be on 4* being OPQS and all.
Pretty open IMO.
Let me re-shuffle it a little bit to reflect a more realistic scenarioJan the Man said:At this moment I would rate the favourites for the Tour as follows (taking into account past form, this year's form, and the Tour parcours.)
***** Evans
**** Wiggins, Sanchez
*** Nibali, Schleck
** Van den Broeck, Rolland, Menchov
* Klöden, Leipheimer, Gesink, Mollema
Angulo said:Nibali is a climber of "Menchov, Sanchez" league. And he is better TT than Andy Gesink, Rolland and van den Broeck. And he is young.
Who can beat him in the mountains? Only Aschleck.
He can beat everyone except Sanchez on downhill.
He CAN attack in the mountains.
Hope he will have strong team.
cineteq said:Let me re-shuffle it a little bit to reflect a more realistic scenario
***** Nibali, Evans
**** Sanchez, Wiggins
*** Gesink, Rolland, Van den Broeck
** Menchov, A. Schleck
* Klöden, Leipheimer, Mollema
TTs among other stagesThe Hitch said:lol, ignoring the tongue in cheek decleration of Nibali as the favourite, where exactly are Gesink, Rolland and Van den Broeck going to take time on Andy Schleck?