benpounder said:
So why dont Andy and Alberto ride without teammates? And to play out your scenerio, I'd grant a hovering support vechicle mere seconds behind.
Of course a strong team helps. And helps in many way on many stages. Frankly, I accept that many here dislike the TTT. What I disagree with is the argument that the TTT is inordinanetly unfair. And this is where most of the arguments against the TTT finaly land. My contention is that no more unfair than having a strong team through-out the race. All I've heard is how such and such rider can lose x amount of time just because they dont have a strong time trialing team. But rarely is the flip side acknowledged - that a strong mountian team likely insures that that same rider not lose time on mountain stages. Certainly, strong TT teams have readily apparent tangible benefits; team strengths elsewhere provide immeasurable, but no less tangible benefits. Focusing on only one side is avoiding the issue raised.
Excuse me in the mountains, a team helps, but ultimately if you are good enough you can stick with another team. If you are 20 seconds behind you can bridge to the other team.
In a ttt, if you are 20 seconds behind and even if you are Cancellara, you can not put in a monster attack to get those 20 seconds back because people like you tell said rider that he
A ttt is a whole different ball game. You keep acting like ttt is the flat equivalent of mountians but actually flat stages are the flat equivalent of mountains. A stronger team can try to drop you but if you are a sufficiently strong individual you can hang on, stay behind them and drop your team.
But in a ttt folks like you demand that certain individuals be tied down by chains, other given huge boosts, all based on who is on their team, and then cry "oh but a team is neccesary in the mountains too".
When a rider on a weak team in a ttt has the ability to bridge to follow a stronger team, then you can have your comparison. Until then it is totaly wrong.