hehe, had some time on my hands this weekend.The Hitch said:Wow, the roll you have been on the last few days I half expect you to find evidence of a positive test at some point tomorrow.
Keep at it.
anyway, plenty of evidence as to why we won't be finding any positive test today or tomorrow.
This Saugy guy and the Lausanne lab is another eyeopener (as if we needed one after the Zorzoli farce) of how Cookson is keen to keep the old system and structures alive that were implemented by Pat and Verbruggen and aimed at controlling who tests positive and who does not.
Saugy is completely, and I mean COMPLETELY, on the FIFA payroll.
In 2008 Jiri Dvorak is quoted as demanding WADA to do LESS testing in soccer. WADA agree and in subsequent years Dvorak is all over the place bragging about how clean soccer is.
Now, here's Saugy TOGETHER with Dvorak, outlining how waterproof FIFA's antidoping plan for Brazil 2014 is.
HEre's Saugy alone, defending FIFA wrt antidoping, stating how they are at the forefront of antidoping.
He comes up with a series of incredible statements such as
In general, sports featuring individuals are more exposed to doping than team sports. Given the speed at which information can travel nowadays, it seems to me it would be very difficult to set up an organised structure with which to dope an entire team. But an individual footballer could certainly take drugs.
Now, if you take some time to seriously think about it, as the newspaper Leparisien did, then FIFA's decision to choose Lausanne as their lab to test Brazil's 2014 samples is just plain crazy and can only mean they didn't want to catch anybody. Regardless of the corrupt Saugy (about whom people have already forgotten that he helped cover up Lance's positives), the trip to get samples from Brazil to Lausanne would normally surpass 36 hours, rendering the samples almost completely useless:
according to Michel Rieu, a former scientific adviser to the French Agency for fight against doping (AFLD) quoted by "Le Monde", "the EPO detection window micro doses administered, as is the rule today is only 12 hours. "Clearly, the time of the trip may well make the effectiveness of controls totally void"
The dark side of it is how all these corrupt bodies and individuals are intertwined and, perhaps more problematic, how WADA appears to be completely toothless in the face of so much clear-cut corruption.
Guys like Blatter (honorary member of the WADA foundation board) own WADA.
A few days ago i would agree if you'd say UCI have more credible antidoping than FIFA.
Now I'm not so sure anymore.