I do not like Sky, Froome, Porte etc at all and I do "feel" they are doping but if I am objective, what is the most realiable indications that they are doping? I say indications because there are no hard evidence, true?
What I see is:
- Froome almost coming out of nowhere becoming the pretty much the best TTer and climber around
- the team dominating TdF for 4 years and looking with a lot of potential for another few years of victories (Froome would be podium last year probably if it had not been for his crash)
- super strong domestiques
- performances at the edge of what supposedly is humanly possible
- performances which is in line with times of the "good old days"
- a couple of TUE events
Honestly, what I feel is the strongest indication, is the super strong domestique performance. It could be that froome is really just super super strong, who knows. Real genetic freaks that can do superior performances, do exist although rare. He could be one. But seeing eg. how Porte in the Giro was pretty week and suddenly he pulls the peleton and beats Quintana, just smells. Two genetic freaks on the same team, no....
What else should I add to my list? What do you think is the strongest indication of doping