- Jan 4, 2013
- 90
- 0
- 0
Bernie's eyesore said:Good to see that Jimmy and Thehog are now friends.
On the subject of Sky in the classics, were they really that bad? 4th in the Omloop, 6th in MSR, 3rd and 9th in DDV, 4th in E3 and 7th in GW. Probably a par set of results given their riders. It's only being classed as a disappointment because it doesn't match up to their record in stage races and because certain people here thought they would return from Tenerife riding like Superman.
MatParker117 said:I have a strong suspicion that Sky may just throw money at Cancellara to solve there classics problems.
keithmcmahon said:
keithmcmahon said:OK, not quite top 20, but what about this more controversial one?
mr #23 2010
http://www.cqranking.com/men/asp/gen/rider.asp?riderid=114
probably, if not the best, one of the best, team captains in the peloton.
something needed after the sham 2010 season
Catwhoorg said:Uran and Henao ?
Neither in the top #20 by CQ or UCI points, but both heavily sought after at the time Sky signed them
At the end of the day, it depends more upon the sponsors views than db.The Hitch said:Rogers less so than EBH. Unlike EBH Rogers did come to my mind. One could say Gerrans as well, but neither are quite Cancellara level.
I didn't say they don't sign good riders. But Cancellara is something else. The poster said he wouldnt be surprised if they signed Cancellara and others have in the past said that Sky bought all the best riders. Signing Cancellara in order to guarantee success at the big races.
Have Sky ever done that?
Have they ever signed anyone with a proven record of challenging and winning at the top races (What today would be Boonen, Gilbert, Cancellara, Purito, Valverde, Contador, Sagan, Greipel, Cavendish Nibali, Froome, Wiggins, Tony Martin maybe even Hejsedal Sanchez and Schleck.)
Cavendish is the only one they signed but that was as much because he was one of them and a Brit, not to win big races. In fact Sky made clear that he was allowed to choose as his main season goal, a race that he wouldnt even ride with the trade team.
Catwhoorg said:There is no chance they will sign Fabian, a "known" Fuetes client.
Him signing the zero tolerance policy would be the final nail in its coffin. The Public (not the clinic) would see it as a joke at that point.
Catwhoorg said:There is no chance they will sign Fabian, a "known" Fuetes client.
Him signing the zero tolerance policy would be the final nail in its coffin. The Public (not the clinic) would see it as a joke at that point.
Lanark said:The public have no idea about those Fuentes rumours. The fact that Knaven signed that 'policy' is ludicrous enough, nobody with a brain thinks that zero tolerance policy is anything but window dressing.
The Hitch said:Rogers less so than EBH. Unlike EBH Rogers did come to my mind. One could say Gerrans as well, but neither are quite Cancellara level.
I didn't say they don't sign good riders. But Cancellara is something else. The poster said he wouldnt be surprised if they signed Cancellara and others have in the past said that Sky bought all the best riders. Signing Cancellara in order to guarantee success at the big races.
Have Sky ever done that?
Have they ever signed anyone with a proven record of challenging and winning at the top races (What today would be Boonen, Gilbert, Cancellara, Purito, Valverde, Contador, Sagan, Greipel, Cavendish Nibali, Froome, Wiggins, Tony Martin maybe even Hejsedal Sanchez and Schleck.)
Cavendish is the only one they signed but that was as much because he was one of them and a Brit, not to win big races. In fact Sky made clear that he was allowed to choose as his main season goal, a race that he wouldnt even ride with the trade team.
keithmcmahon said:Having said that db knows that there is more in cycling fans hearts than just the GT's. Bear in mind, ebh is expensive and at the moment it looks as if he won't deliver a classics win. Releasing him will free up lots of money. re has already said ebh needs to justify his wages - in so many words.
It was actually in a Sunday Times article by David Walsh so is not available publically, but here is the quoteDear Wiggo said:re = Rod Ellingworth?
Any chance for a link to where he was saying or hinting at this?
Ellingworth is an affable former rider who has risen through the ranks of Team Sky’s management structure and though he smiles a lot, his good humour comes with constant reminders that the team are in a results business.
“Edvald [Boasson Hagen] is on a good contract and he needs to win more than he has . . . Pete Kennaugh is a very good rider with a lot of potential but it has to be turned into performances . . . our two young Americans Joe [Dombrowski] and Ian [Boswell] are talented but they haven’t had the physical development they should have had over the last two years. They will need a little time. Young Josh [Edmondson] has performed extremely well this week but we had to talk to him about things, like not answering his phone.”
keithmcmahon said:It was actually in a Sunday Times article by David Walsh so is not available publically, but here is the quote
Sky also insisted on ebh changing coaches for this year as well to someone internal to the team.
Ferminal said:Do we add Flecha to the list of flinchers?
Lanark said:You mean in the sense that he was afraid to sign the Sky zero-tolerance policy?
As a rider of Vacansoleil he had to sign a similair document saying he never doped. He obviously isn't afraid to lie.
http://www.volkskrant.nl/vk/nl/2698...Flecha-was-klant-van-dopingarts-Fuentes.dhtmlFerminal said:Was Flecha's contract up at Sky?
Doesn't look like it:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/flecha-knees-barry-renew-contracts-with-sky
http://www1.skysports.com/news/17564/7237650/
I wonder if you got a payout for admitting? Good financial decision if so.
Ferminal said:I wonder if you got a payout for admitting? Good financial decision if so.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:
peterst6906 said:Could be a quick exit from the team coming up.
Bernie's eyesore said:I agree, Flech could be out on his ear when Brailsford hears about this.
