EnacheV said:I suspect he is gullible and can be tricked easy. Seems the type putting a lot on "honor" and "trust".
funny
10
EnacheV said:I suspect he is gullible and can be tricked easy. Seems the type putting a lot on "honor" and "trust".
EnacheV said:If they win from January to December = doping
If they win from February to July = doping
I think your problem is
If <big category of cyclists that you generally hate cause you are hater> wins they dope because i don't ****ing like them.
i think the truth is far away from you dopeborgs
P.S. even if one of them woul dbe caught doping, this won't mean you were right. You were lucky to have a 1% hit rate on your generalized hate.
Bralisford have never seen seen doping, so he just didn't know what to look for. That's all.the sceptic said:At least their real talents did pretty well today.
Also funny how the worlds leading cycling genius Brailsford couldnt figure out JTL was doping last year.
EnacheV said:If they win from January to December = doping
If they win from February to July = doping
I think your problem is
If <big category of cyclists that you generally hate cause you are hater> wins they dope because i don't ****ing like them.
i think the truth is far away from you dopeborgs
P.S. even if one of them woul dbe caught doping, this won't mean you were right. You were lucky to have a 1% hit rate on your generalized hate.
Haha wow. This one is comedy gold:LaFlorecita said:The comments on this youtube vid are just hilarious. Some pretty funny discussions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52xv2Hg2fkI
Don't know if he's doping or not, but one thing is for sure: his seated hyper cadence attacks are legit! It's both more efficient and more sneaky since you stay seated. I tried it to very good effect on my last ride: when I attacked the traditional way on the climbs, it didn't work, but when I imitated Froome, I dropped everybody!
LaFlorecita said:The comments on this youtube vid are just hilarious. Some pretty funny discussions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52xv2Hg2fkI
Cycle Chic said:What do they say ?
Cycle Chic said:What do they say ?
Fantastic ride by a fantastic rider. I wish drug cheats like Contador were banned for life, though, his presence casts a dark shadow over the race, and the sport as a whole. They threw out one of Brunyeel's creations, time to through out one of the others.
well then you are an idiot and clearly pay no attention to anything sky have done or anything Froome has done you are just going on the way he dropped Contador and your not thinking about how he trained or he how sacrificed so many things to be able to do that !
I never comment on youtube posts but you sir are a joke. Froome is clean he has trained hard, worked hard and sacrificed to be where he is. Just because he outcalsses the field you think he is doping? Get a grip. I imagine you dont cycle and dont know the effort and time they put into working hard. Before sky he was not a nobody he was outcalssing many cyclists and being noticed for the solid power he could churn out again and again. Comment like yours are disgusting.
haha your a joke. Do you think Usain Bolt is doping? Do you think mo farah? Jessica Ennis? The brownlee brothers? Sorry but just because one person outclasses the field and works hard he isnt cheating. Do you remember last year when he outclassed everyone on the mountains and had to wait for wiggins.Team sky have the most advanced training facilities and program any cycling outfit has had maybe this explains why he does so well. Maybe you should get off your keyboard and cycle a little. im assuming since you are an expert you also know that he had bilharzia infection and therefore was undergoing treatment? That he was producing mixed results on the road but solid tests in the lab because of this ilness that was then cured at team sky?
Contador could be dropped like that because he is no longer doping. He only won what he did because of his doping, now he's clean, clean riders like Froome and Nibali can show how to do it the right way. If Froome was doping, he wouldn't have bonked on Alpe D'Huez. He picked the stages he was going to attack on, its called strategy, not doping.
You probably don't even watch the races, SKY came with a new strategy in going all in for the GC. New training methods, they train specifically for the course. How can you explain that Contador was caught doping but none of the SKY team have been. Froome was tested 70+ times including 19 tests during the tour. I am not 100% certain everyone in cycling is clean but there is nothing unusual about the team with the new ideas dominating.
You **** how dare you suggest he is doping! Go die in a hole you pathetic piece of ****
Except they are not wiping the floor with everyone do you really believe that if they were doping they would risk losing the tour on stage 9 when their whole team fell back and cracked and on alp D'huez. It was a legitimate CLEAN tour de france and has been for 3 years.
Exactly, People seem to ignore the fact that many staff and cyclists lost jobs at team sky after the lance revelation because it became apparent they had previously doped a team would not fire staff and riders if they where just going to go an dope there way to victory. I put most of the accusations down to contador fans who where shown he is nothing without drugs compared to other top level clean cyclist.
Cycle Chic said:ohhhhh...thought you meant the dutch commentary
Cycle Chic said:ohhhhh...thought you meant the dutch commentary
LaFlorecita said:I think it's Danish![]()
Fearless Greg Lemond said:http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cycling...-froome-unfair-journalist-20130722-2qf3v.html
''He spoke to Richard Freeman, one of Team Sky's doctors, about Froome's dramatic improvement in the 2011 Vuelta a Espana and was convinced by the medical expert's theory.
"I was confused because Chris hadn't performed with this consistency for the team and I wondered how he'd done it," Freeman told Walsh.
"Before I could be satisfied, I spent two weeks re-examining all of his blood samples from his two seasons in our team and looked at all the information in his biological passport.
"What I wanted was to compare blood results from the Vuelta with the blood tests he'd done previously to see if there were changes. There weren't.
"His blood values remained the same and whatever the reasons for him riding consistently in that Vuelta, in my opinion it wasn't down to him doing things he shouldn't have done."
JimmyFingers said:Do we seriously need quoted comments from youtube in this thread?
sniper said:hilarious![]()
sittingbison said:Come on gentle(wo)men,
No need to post the actual comments
Cheers
Bison
LaFlorecita said:...Do you have any idea how long it took me to copy and paste all the quotes and add them into quotes while on my phonethanks dude I just wasted 10 minutes of my life
sittingbison said:Jeepers LaFlo only 10 minutes!! That's an awesome effort. Chapeau!!
sittingbison said:Come on gentle(wo)men,
No need to post the actual comments
Pandora said:How is this possible? I thought bilharzia he had got rid of shortly before the Vuelta should've had big influence on the blood values.
And now they are saying it hadn't? Can somebody explain this to me, please? I'm not blonde, but certainly feel like one![]()
Cycle Chic said:What do they say ?
