- May 26, 2010
- 28,143
- 5
- 0
xcleigh said:This is an interesting point. May I perhaps ask how you think the meeting with ASO went and what was discussed? Do you think Brailsford did brazenly tell ASO 'we are going to win your race, UCI are on board, we will be doping but don't worry it's all under control. Rest assured it won't be another Festina'. How do you feel ASO might have reacted to such a proposal?
I'm happy to countenance things happen behind the scenes we will never know about but would be interested to know exactly what you feel might be discussed at these meetings. I agree it causes reason to be inquisitive of such meetings but I do struggle to comprehend exactly how one would broach the matter of 'we'll be doping at your race and we'll win it'. Or do they (SKY) not mention that to ASO? One would have though a team telling them such things risks ASO calling them out on it. ASO/UCI aren't exactly bosom buddies as far as I know(?) so kicking SKY off the tour start roster could be a consequence of such a meeting with ASO could it not? As they may not buy in to the whole scheme/proposal? I'm just trying to get a scene in my head as to how this might all work as I genuinely can't quite work it out as yet.
Also, might I add, Pat doesn't do a good job of not focusing attention on the main characters of such a scheme, Wiggins and SKY. He is a plonker.
I can only guess what they presented to ASO, something along the lines of if Sky win the viewership figures of the Tdf and other ASO events in Sky media territories will rise.
Otherwise why does a cycling team do a presentation for, these are the bikes, this is the socks, the saddle creams, the bottles, the bar tape etc......


