- Aug 28, 2012
- 4,250
- 51
- 15,580
mattghg said:IIRC there was some statement from Sky that this is the case. When they were getting everyone to (re-)sign the declaration last year, people were saying this was really bad for transparency because no-one would admit to doping in the past if they knew they'd be sacked as a result. Possibly as a result, some statement came out saying that anyone who admitted it then and there would at least get a payoff, whereas if anything came out later they'd be sacked immediately and without a payoff (thus apparently creating some motivation for people to be honest).
a years pay is pretty standard in most cases.
