sniper said:
why aren't you worried about the fact that cookson is flat out lying?
Because I'm far from convinced he is. And people seem to be almost afraid to ask him to clarify for some bizarre reason.
You'd almost conclude people WANT UCI to be corrupt, WANT Cookson to be corrupt. Would be ANNOYED if there was improvement. As if protecting their own narrative is more important than the bleeding sport! Almost.
Digger asked a good question. About time someone did. But he wasn't ignored. He got an answer that was at least partly useful, and rather than pull at the thread to see exactly where it goes, everybody's (not just Digger by any stretch) run off clucking like hens. Like they didn't actually want an answer. Like getting an answer actually miffed them. Like it was just grandstanding.
And now Hitch is spouting that you really SHOULDN'T ask UCI follow ups, because it only helps the UCI find the flaws themselves!! Much better to run off and have a good speculate in the Clinic!!
You really couldn't make that sh!t up, sniper. That is circularity brought to an amazing new level. Don't question the corrupt, it only encourages them!! I bet politicians would love that rule!
Now, you may in an honest moment consider yourself 'on the side' of these posters. That's fine. But this is not their finest hour.