No, it did not.
Just because Kuss was the one who ended up gaining time early and Roglic was held back in an effort to gain this time back, it doesn't mean the next time the roles wouldn't be reversed and that Roglic couldn't be the one who ends up gaining time and Vingegaard is held back, for example.
If we assume that statistically Roglic has a bigger chance to be weaker than Vingegaard than stronger than him, he could have a better chance winning the TdF the Kuss way than changing teams and going against Vingegaard and Kuss and whoever else they throw into the mix in a straight fight. Even more so if you include the factor that Jumbo's ways of getting performance out of riders seem to be the best in the peloton at the moment and Roglic switching teams may end up hurting is performance a bit. If you make these assumptions, Zeeman's comment makes perfect sense.
If Roglič is ahead of Vingegaard in GC at the TdF, his esteemed Danish teammate will attack him again, again & again until he's ahead.
I don't imagine for one minute Rog would benefit from the "he's a loyal teammate so I'll gift him the win" sentiment which Kuss benefitted from in the Vuelta. It'll be a deathmatch.