Interesting that 2 ex-pros, Sean Kelly & Philippa York, both think that things will change at Jumbo. Too many team leaders!
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
He's older then Vingegaard and has problems beating Pogacar at the Tour. Too many leaders cause problems and even "knucklehead" Horner pointed out this early this year.For the sake of the argument, let's assume that Jumbo in fact systematically dis-favours and underutilizes Roglic, their multi-million investment, as some posters either claim or insinuate they do.
Prima facie it is irrational. Why do they do this, then?
It probably would have taken a scenario where Ayuso or Evenepoel drop Kuss while Vingegaard and Roglic then drop Ayuso and Vingegaard later. Basically overtaking Kuss would have to be a natural consequences of defending the teams interest, rather than the individual interest.Ultimately, Jumbo couldn't win this Vuelta no matter who they let take GC. The W for Kuss is probably the outcome that causes the least trouble and makes the most people happy. It also offers them a chance to spin the agenda of winning all three grand tours with three different riders. You cannot make everybody happy, and thus, all things considered, I think having Kuss get the top spot is the best outcome.
Still, you'll have people up in arms, i.e. Roglic fans who think they stole a Vuelta from him. That Vingegaard was just better in the third week is something that they of course conveniently sweep under their carpets. It's also quite ironic, since Roglic is the one who has most benefitted from Jumbo and their strength in numbers. From Kuss saving a multitude of GCs, to Wout keeping him in yellow in Nice and Vingegaard basically gifting him a Dauphine when the latter was already better.
So we would be treated to the spectacle of Roglic working for Remco.There is a lot of talk that Ineos are interested in Roglic. There is also a lot of talk that Ineos is going to merge with QuickStep.
There's a lot of talk that my mother is an aeroplane. There isn't? Well, now there is.There is a lot of talk that Ineos are interested in Roglic. There is also a lot of talk that Ineos is going to merge with QuickStep.
So I take it you just parachuted into this world?There's a lot of talk that my mother is an aeroplane. There isn't? Well, now there is.
There's a lot of talk that my mother is an aeroplane. There isn't? Well, now there is.
That's my grandmother.If she had wheels, she would have been a bike.
I don’t think there is any clear evidence that Vingegaard was stronger in the third week of this Vuelta or that he would have won that Dauphine. Roglic beat him on a previous mountain top finish and in the ITT. Vingegaard would have needed to beat him by 41 seconds on that stage to win the overall, and he set a career best on that climb as it was.Ultimately, Jumbo couldn't win this Vuelta no matter who they let take GC. The W for Kuss is probably the outcome that causes the least trouble and makes the most people happy. It also offers them a chance to spin the agenda of winning all three grand tours with three different riders. You cannot make everybody happy, and thus, all things considered, I think having Kuss get the top spot is the best outcome.
Still, you'll have people up in arms, i.e. Roglic fans who think they stole a Vuelta from him. That Vingegaard was just better in the third week is something that they of course conveniently sweep under their carpets. It's also quite ironic, since Roglic is the one who has most benefitted from Jumbo and their strength in numbers. From Kuss saving a multitude of GCs, to Wout keeping him in yellow in Nice and Vingegaard basically gifting him a Dauphine when the latter was already better.
Johan Bruyneel said the other day on his podcast that a proposal (for a merger) has been filed with the UCI.There's a lot of talk that my mother is an aeroplane. There isn't? Well, now there is.
Those 40 seconds are including Vaujany, where Vingegaard was already doing the Lord's work and would definitely not lose any time in a scenario where they'd be facing one another. That's already a different picture.I don’t think there is any clear evidence that Vingegaard was stronger in the third week of this Vuelta or that he would have won that Dauphine. Roglic beat him on a previous mountain top finish and in the ITT. Vingegaard would have needed to beat him by 41 seconds on that stage to win the overall, and he set a career best on that climb as it was.
Critérium du Dauphiné 2022 Stage 8 results
Primož RogliÄ is the winner of Critérium du Dauphiné 2022, before Jonas Vingegaard and Ben O'Connor. Jonas Vingegaard is the winner of the final stage.www.procyclingstats.com
Yes he would, even if it of course would have been less.Those 40 seconds are including Vaujany, where Vingegaard was already doing the Lord's work and would definitely not lose any time in a scenario where they'd be facing one another. That's already a different picture.
Agreed, no one knows for sure about that Dauphine. Vingegaard looked very, very comfortable with Roglic there and did much better in the tour afterwards, so most reason that he had alot left.I don’t think there is any clear evidence that Vingegaard was stronger in the third week of this Vuelta or that he would have won that Dauphine. Roglic beat him on a previous mountain top finish and in the ITT. Vingegaard would have needed to beat him by 41 seconds on that stage to win the overall, and he set a career best on that climb as it was.
Critérium du Dauphiné 2022 Stage 8 results
Primož RogliÄ is the winner of Critérium du Dauphiné 2022, before Jonas Vingegaard and Ben O'Connor. Jonas Vingegaard is the winner of the final stage.www.procyclingstats.com
Right. The problem for Roglic is that he rides a lot like pogi. Jonas wins because he is a different rider type. He doesn't rely on bonus seconds and sprint, but consistency and stamina.What one can say with certainty is that Vingegaard has been on an extremely high level in the last two tours. He and Pog have smashed the competition. And the other thing with Vingegaard is that he seems really consistent, hardly ever has a weak moment. Even in this Vuelta which he wasn't that prepared for he never really struggled in the mountains, not even when he was a bit sick during the first weak. It was only in the itt he lacked something.
Can Rogla reach Vinge's level in the tour? I'm a bit doubtful but I wouldn't fully rule it out. Like kn0s said he is a different rider from Vinge and a tour win by Rogla would probably look different.
"Quick, someone! Get Primoz' and Jonas' GT jerseys!"
![]()
The ulmatite "troll move" would have been for Roglic and Vingegaard to rock up to the start in pink and yellow.
Luckily for Jonas, they won't have to switch jerseys during the stage.