Famous last words..Yes and get annihilated by Pogi or Remco which will bring them down a level.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Famous last words..Yes and get annihilated by Pogi or Remco which will bring them down a level.
I've said this before, but I don't think winning 3 GTs in a year matters much in the sponsor search. If they win the Vuelta you won't suddenly have a potential multi million euro sponsor thinking: oh wait a minute, this is actually a pretty good team. If nobody's interested by now, they won't be interested by next month either.
I don't think their results are the problem, it's who gets these results. They're somewhere in the middle between a Dutch team and an international team. For a Dutch domestic sponsor the international stars aren't that interesting, and for an international sponsor the Dutch department doesn't add anything.
For what? In the end it will be the same....just pogacar and vingegaard. It's more a question of pogacar have better legs than Vingegaard.
Jumbo Visma has a great team to neutralize possible dangerous breaks. A team with guys like laporte, van aert, van baarle, nathan, control very easily the race. Then, in the mountains, kuss can make the necessary job, they will also have jorgenson next year, they also have kelderman. A team like this is enough even if emirates takes pogacar, ayuso, almeida and yates to the tour.Only if they all ride for Pogacar in the traditional sense.
But if they show up with an aggressive "wolfpack" mindset, and lieutenants start hitting breaks the first week (like Kuss did at the Vuelta), they can conceivably put Vingegaard under pressure later in the race, if he is Jumbo's only guy for GC.
Thus I think they need Roglic at the Tour next year - but whether he will accept riding as No 2 is of course the question.
Jumbo Visma has a great team to neutralize possible dangerous breaks. A team with guys like laporte, van aert, van baarle, nathan, control very easily the race. Then, in the mountains, kuss can make the necessary job, they will also have jorgenson next year, they also have kelderman. A team like this is enough even if emirates takes pogacar, ayuso, almeida and yates to the tour.
We don't know yet all the route of the Tour. Yes, there will be a ITT, but it's in the last stage, not in stage 5.I disagree, and I think it is going to happen, because 3 of the first 5 stages of the Tour are opportunities for lieutenants to take time, especially with Pogacar probably having (finally) learned his lesson and riding the first week conservatively, rather than going for stage wins and minor time gaps - and stage 5 is an ITT perfectly suited for both Pogacar, Ayuso, Yates and Almeida.
Yes we do know stage 5 is an ITT.We don't know yet all the route of the Tour. Yes, there will be a ITT, but it's in the last stage, not in stage 5.
That's stage 21 isn't it?Yes we do know stage 5 is an ITT.
![]()
Tour de France 2024: Route and stages
Tadej Pogacar won the 111th edition of the Tour de France ahead of Jonas Vingegaard and Adam Yates. The first blow was struck by the Slovenian as early as thwww.cyclingstage.com
Talk about posting one's L's. Lol.Yes we do know stage 5 is an ITT.
![]()
Tour de France 2024: Route and stages
Tadej Pogacar won the 111th edition of the Tour de France ahead of Jonas Vingegaard and Adam Yates. The first blow was struck by the Slovenian as early as thwww.cyclingstage.com
"The 111th Tour de France sets off on Saturday 29 June to finish on Sunday 21 July with an ITT."Yes we do know stage 5 is an ITT.
![]()
Tour de France 2024: Route and stages
Tadej Pogacar won the 111th edition of the Tour de France ahead of Jonas Vingegaard and Adam Yates. The first blow was struck by the Slovenian as early as thwww.cyclingstage.com
A complicating factor could be that (according to Dutch journalist Thijs Zonneveld) both Ayuso and Almeida have written in their contract that they never have to work for Pogacar. That's why you never see them together in a race.I disagree, and I think it is going to happen, because 3 of the first 5 stages of the Tour are opportunities for lieutenants to take time, especially with Pogacar probably having (finally) learned his lesson and riding the first week conservatively, rather than going for stage wins and minor time gaps - and stage 5 is an ITT perfectly suited for both Pogacar, Ayuso, Yates and Almeida.
If one day Grischa says "Show the world who's the strongest" the race is over. It's obviously an encoded message to You Know Who to push 7 w/kg.
Oh god, now it's Niermann again who's the evildoer.In this Vuelta, Grischa Niermann 'showed the world who's the strongest', aka himself.
Everything that happened here within Jumbo (Kuss getting his huge advantage, Vingegaard leapfrogging Rog in GC) was down to his decisions in the team car.
I guess he wanted Vinge to win & didn't anticipate Kuss becoming an internet phenomenon (the Captain Tom of pro cycling), i.e. there's an interview from a few days ago where he almost laments (reading between the lines) how Kuss seems to have the favor of the public.
In this Vuelta, Grischa Niermann 'showed the world who's the strongest', aka himself.
Everything that happened here within Jumbo (Kuss getting his huge advantage, Vingegaard leapfrogging Rog in GC) was down to his decisions in the team car.
I guess he wanted Vinge to win & didn't anticipate Kuss becoming an internet phenomenon (the Captain Tom of pro cycling), i.e. there's an interview from a few days ago where he almost laments (reading between the lines) how Kuss seems to have the favor of the public.
Yes, in hindsight it's quite funny that the Kuss breakaway was actually to test Quickstep. Boy, did Quickstep fail the testHowever at the race's conclusion:
1) Vingo, despite 8-seconds gap, didn't attack the leader but helped him.
2) He also didn't fight to the end for the prestigious Angliru win.
So the race winner is the same as it would've been without this JV beef. Kuss attacked to bait Remco as JV expected a stronger opposition initially (and I don't think anyone in the team was opposing that).
Yeah, and instead of fighting or trying... Remco just gave up. I think it was a strategic move. He got his "hero" moment on the day after his "collapse". Then winning another stage, three in total, and the KOM. Remco is probably "happy" with that. He has been in the spotlight throughout the whole race. His persona and brand has probably only expanded. He can live another season on the "what if". He just had a "bad" day. Otherwhise he would have challenged! Him and the sport benefits from that narrative.However at the race's conclusion:
1) Vingo, despite 8-seconds gap, didn't attack the leader but helped him.
2) He also didn't fight to the end for the prestigious Angliru win.
So the race winner is the same as it would've been without this JV beef. Kuss attacked to bait Remco as JV expected a stronger opposition initially (and I don't think anyone in the team was opposing that).
Yes, in hindsight it's quite funny that the Kuss breakaway was actually to test Quickstep. Boy, did Quickstep fail the test![]()
Police doing police thingsWhat the hell was this all about?
View: https://twitter.com/relevo/status/1702357766268948891?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1702357766268948891%7Ctwgr%5E6106925b7ea3172e0858bf6d2bdbd1741710b212%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fekipa.svet24.si%2Fapi%2Fdynamic%3Fid%3D1083799
My (very intuitive) take:
During the Tourmalet / Bejes stages, Vingegaard attacked mainly to win the stage. Especially in the Bejes stage, he got way more time than he thought he would get, because there was no chase at all for some time. Whether or not Vingegaard attacked before his turn, I don't know (see further). Vingegaard came to the Vuelta as back-up for Roglic, and to keep riding a bit (his calendar wasn't very full until the Tour), or his season would have been very short and without goals after July. So he didn't really have any fixed targets in this Vuelta (a GC win was no must), and his whole body language was one of being relaxed.
Roglic... he came to the Vuelta with way more ambition. He was the first GC guy. As he had already won the Giro, he could start without stress, and he was (and obviously is) in great shape. The problems started at Javalambre. Vingegaard could follow him (easily). Next, Vingegaard attacked in 2 stages and thus was intervening with Roglic' GC plans, and took away 2 opportunities from Roglic to attack / win a stage, on Tourmalet and Bejes. Roglic wanted to show his shape (he didn't train for nothing) by conquering Angliru. Vingegaard duly followed, but you already saw that Vingegaard was on crossroads: Vingegaard wanted to just follow Roglic and not force it, but he understood that this would as well end Kuss' hopes of the GC win.
So in the end, Vingegaard was the buffer that kept Roglic at bay, and he is such a good buffer that he easily could have won himself, but he showed everyone he didn't have to win and was happy with Kuss in GC lead. Roglic was more into the 'I want show everyone what they expect from me = race and win' mentality. But he also realizes that he can't shake Vingegaard, and that Vingegaard will thus win if Roglic attacks / drops Kuss again.