Briant_Gumble said:So what percentage do most in here believe is an accurate depiction of how many are doping?
30%, 50%, 70%, 98%?
I'll be interested to hear some responses.
Of the top 100? I'd say at least 50%.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Briant_Gumble said:So what percentage do most in here believe is an accurate depiction of how many are doping?
30%, 50%, 70%, 98%?
I'll be interested to hear some responses.
+100000000iejeecee said:another brilliant bbc article with the following headline
rafael nadal's incredible run of form on hard courts prompts the question: Have the spaniard's knee problems made him a better player?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/tennis/24011898
why don't sport journalists start writing about ufo's or the lochness monster or something?
It would be more credible and believable as the **** they are trying to shove down the public's throat to excuse obvious dopers.
He is just playing like Borg or Wilander, just 2 times faster and can keep that speed 2 times longer.red_flanders said:Nadal looks and plays like people did before steroids took over the sport. I find it easy to believe he's clean.
Nadal is preposterous.
fuzzydunlop3 said:how does someone with knees like Nadal remain the fittest player on tour? surely his injuries have affected his ability to train as much. how can that be explained?
iejeecee said:Another brilliant BBC article with the following headline
Rafael Nadal's incredible run of form on hard courts prompts the question: have the Spaniard's knee problems made him a better player?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/tennis/24011898
Why don't sport journalists start writing about UFO's or the Lochness monster or something?
It would be more credible and believable as the **** they are trying to shove down the public's throat to excuse obvious dopers.
Bicycle said:I've never believed the knees story if they were that bad he would have packed the game in. It;s just an excuse to explain withdrawals and downtimes and also a reason for some exotic TUEs.
Just heard tennis commentator on BBC radio say that Nadal is playing more aggressive to protect his knees. Do these guys actually believe what they're saying? These knees are the most absurd injury ever.
HappyCycling said:Joined because I can't discuss doping matters in tennis over at MTF. Frankly, I am sick of seeing this Nadal soap opera play out. He is doped to the gills and I am sick of him making a mockery of the sport I love. ****ing moonballer.
HappyCycling said:Djokovic's 2011 jump is the most unbelievable dramatic increase in endurance I have ever seen.
the sceptic said:Welcome.
Looks like Nadal upped the game. Will be interesting to see how Djokovic responds. (remember in 2010 he got owned by Nadal similarly and then he transformed himself before the 2011 season)
I bet Nadal will get "injured" soon. I doubt he can keep this level going for the rest of the season.
Not really. He had a breathing problems which plague him to this day (I believe that explanation is 'exercise induced asthma'), you can see that after long points he is breathing heavily. Despite all that he managed to play 90+ matches in 2009.robow7 said:True, he went from someone who had relatively poor endurance to one who has just about the greatest endurance, and of course all due to a gluten free diet.