roundabout said:
Yeah and no, I think Courier was done as a top player by 25. Or maybe the rest stepped up?
just prematurely burnt out. What is Ferrer the Spaniard? 33? Hewitt's age? wtf!
Courier had the attrition game. nock you into the court and next night.
Andynonomous said:
Courier had a very short career at the top (I think he won all of his grand slams within 2 years). Doesn't mean he didn't use anything, but he didn't have an extended career, like some ped users do.
attrition game. he did have a degree of talent, but p'raps like Hewitt, he overperformed, won his Slams, there were more on the horizon and potential Slams to come, think about after Sampras, there was a lull. Agassi took advantage of the depth, lack of it. Rafter? he was not that talent. He might have been serve and volley, cos he was, but he still played the "attrition game. be better "prepared". fitter, stronger, like nadal. but a different game foundation. anyone thru the 90s who started the Armstrong "fitter, harder worker line" was the BS. Muster, Courier, and Rafter all used this justification.
robow7 said:
I don't see it in Courier as much but Muster was a little bull that could bang away on clay all day. Remember too that Muster was involved in a horrific accident where he was fortunate just to live and no one expected him to play but he did have a strong desire to prove others wrong. He was a determined SOB. A couple years ago at age 42, he tried to make a come back and couldn't even win a round or two on the Challenger circuit (the minor leagues), makes Horner's Vuelta all that more special Ha !
Muster was a bull. but that does not me, that Courier, and Rafter, were not doing the same thing. The same attrition game, of nocking your opponenent off the court into the next day. This is the Uncle Toni strategy adoption schema. Where did he get it from?