Mr Armstrong recognises the error of his ways and will be given a 3 month suspension from the months October through January.
Yeah, not the same.
You could maybe compare it to Froome's or Contador's cases.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Mr Armstrong recognises the error of his ways and will be given a 3 month suspension from the months October through January.
But you’re assuming he’s not directly responsible, not only of doping but of scapegoating his trainer? It’s an outlandish excuse, not replicable scientifically, and honestly I wish penalties could be added if someone can’t show evidence that their excuse is based on. Like a yellow card for flopping.Of course he's ultimately responsible, hence the ban.
I don't know what 'gotten completely shitcanned non therapeutic amounts of PEDs' means.
But you’re assuming he’s not directly responsible, not only of doping but of scapegoating his trainer? It’s an outlandish excuse, not replicable scientifically, and honestly I wish penalties could be added if someone can’t show evidence that their excuse is based on. Like a yellow card for flopping.
Really? You mean to replicate the process, they sprayed (not rubbed) onto one spot on the hand (the approximate spot where the cut would be) of our test subject (trainer) a small amount of a substance containing a small amount of the steroid, and then had that person give a massage to our experimental subject #2,, and tested that second person to see whether they could test positive for that steroid? That is the burden of proof I would like to see, if he's done that, okay.I believe he has shown that evidence.
On Saturday it emerged that a deal had been reached that....
Contador had a choice to be retroactive banned or get a full 2 year ban plus Tour results removed. He chose the former.Haven’t paid a lot of attention to this but seems a bit like Contador’s Clenbuterol case ? Contador copped a two year retrospective ban and loss of titles for a substance with no minimum limit. Sinner gets three months?
World #1, too big to fall? And tennis is certainly a much bigger global sport than cycling which is also more accustomed to doping scandals then tennis.
Pretty sure that in the Contador case WADA still accepted the "no intent" line of thinking while going to CAS or something.Quite a bit different. Clenbutorol isn't licenced or prescribed for human use in Europe whereas Clostebol can be bought without prescription over the counter in various skin products and it's known contamination happens when used topically. The issue Contadors lawyer had was there was no established facts that supported eating steak reared with Clenbutorol raised levels in the way evident in Contadors samples. As the class is S1, it's really no different in sanction to any S1 substance and a 2 year ban back then.
Haven't you seen the media campaign for Sinner. When the talking heads come out saying "Sinner is a good boy who wouldn't dope" you just can't keep a straight faceHaven’t paid a lot of attention to this but seems a bit like Contador’s Clenbuterol case ? Contador copped a two year retrospective ban and loss of titles for a substance with no minimum limit. Sinner gets three months?
World #1, too big to fall? And tennis is certainly a much bigger global sport than cycling which is also more accustomed to doping scandals then tennis.
It's true - he was also NoVaxsWhat is interesting to me is how has Novak avoided any doping allegations given the hate for him. Is he really that careful or does he not use anything banned?
The evidence didn't get as far as supporting 'no intent' as none of the conditions for eliminating or reducing the period of ineligibility as provided by Contador were applicable – in particular because the exact contaminated supplement is unknown and the circumstances surrounding its ingestion were equally unknown – therefore the period of ineligibility had to be two years.Pretty sure that in the Contador case WADA still accepted the "no intent" line of thinking while going to CAS or something.
So true. Discouraging.WADA is a joke
![]()
WADA explains reasons for different doping bans for Sinner and Spanish figure skater
The World Anti-Doping Agency on Monday offered an explanation for why top-ranked tennis player Jannik Sinner received a much shorter doping ban than the six-year suspension it handed to a Spanish figure skater in a similar doping case.apnews.com
"This was a case that was a million miles away from doping," Wada general counsel Ross Wenzel told BBC Sport.
"The scientific feedback that we received was that this could not be a case of intentional doping, including micro-dosing."
Wenzel rejected any suggestion of special treatment and said the terms of the ban - that some have claimed will have little effect on Sinner - were appropriate for the case and not taken with the tennis calendar in mind.
Who I wonder thought the sanction was too hard?Wenzel said: "Wada has received messages from those that consider that the sanction was too high and, in some respects, if you have some saying this is unfair on the athlete, and others saying it's not enough, maybe it's an indication that although it's not going to be popular with everyone, maybe it's an indication that it was in the right place.
"When we look at these cases we try to look at them technically, operationally and we don't do it with fear of what the public and the politicians or anyone is going to say."
Me. Sinner went through the process to prove how the drug could be found in his system. Then when you consider the sophistication of the testing equipment which can pick up trace amounts of substances then more cases will happen in the future. I'll also add Swiatek got pinged for a similar offence and received a one month suspension.https://www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/articles/cdxexxl936vo
Who I wonder thought the sanction was too hard?
more at
https://www.si.com/tennis/did-jannik-sinner-get-away-with-doping
It's not like " it happened by accident " is not a pretty common excuse given by offenders. And a cycling specific thing that goes sort of unmentioned, riders from Dominican Republic, Colombia, Venezuela just skip tests when asked, don't report addresses so out of competition tests are near impossible.Amazing that science has gone so far now they can disprove intent.
“. . . scientific feedback that we received was that this could not be a case of intentional doping, including micro-dosing.”https://www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/articles/cdxexxl936vo
Who I wonder thought the sanction was too hard?
more at
https://www.si.com/tennis/did-jannik-sinner-get-away-with-doping
But of course this analogy goes both ways. At the end of the day, WADA was foolish to appeal the ITIA decision and once they looked further into the case they then realised they could lose at CAS. In effect, Sinner has saved WADA's bacon."Theoretical physics can also prove that an elephant can hang off a cliff with its tail tied to a daisy! But use your eyes, your common sense."