Lol, what am i smoking? We are talking about palmares of the best riders, so we are counting mainly wins, not podiums. Compare total wins, compare WT wins. The only edge MvdP has is that he has won 2 more monuments. If you think a Vuelta + WCC ITT is doing a lot of heavy lifting, i would argue the exact same about those 2 monuments in your comparison.
Vuelta + WCC + WCC ITT + LBL x 2 is roughly on par with WCC + RVV x2 + MSR + PR
On top of that Evenepoel has more total wins, as well as more WT wins. The rest is comparing a classics rider to GC rider. Evenepoel less 2nd/3rd tier classics, but (way) more GT stagewins and lower tier GC's.
If you don't think that is enough to put Evenepoel at the very least on par with Van der Poel, feel free to take the comparison even further.
Head to head career results between Remco Evenepoel and Mathieu van der Poel. The overal score is 54.8% for Remco Evenepoel versus 45.2% for Mathieu van der Poel. A comparison on same race results, time trial points and the points per age.
www.procyclingstats.com
More career total points, more points per km.
Or at the All time ranking where only one of them is in the top 100:
The ProCyclingStats alltime ranking is led by Eddy Merckx with 3850.9 points, before Sean Kelly (2158.2 points) and Francesco Moser (2126.6 points). Considering the enormous gap between Merckx and Kelly (1692.7) we can conclude that Merckx is the best rider of all time.
www.procyclingstats.com