red_flanders said:A couple of straight questions:
• Do you think Horner won the Vuelta clean?
• Do you think Froome won the Tour clean?
• Do you think Horner would beat Froome in a head-to-head climbing battle if the above conditions were in play?
I would love to hear a 'yes', 'no' or 'I don't know'.
thehog said:Not saying Horner isn't doping. But this is a stretch.
Froome will need to open up his bio before next years Tour.
I think its the right thing to do. The pressure was immense this year.
Time will tell.
Anyway I think Prati di Tivo is our best and only indication so far of C v C.
Race Radio said:No, I don't think either were clean.....but that has nothing to do with why I think Horner on top form would beat Froome. It is purely numbers. Horner's performance on the Angrilu is better then any performance we have seen for several years.
thehog said:The entire peloton including sprinters was beating Froome when he was on Barloworld![]()
thehog said:SRMs can guess the weight of another rider?
Not saying Horner isn't doping. But this is a stretch.
Race Radio said:Nibali and Kwiatkowski beat Horner on Prati di Tivo. Not surprising given he was not on top form
Race Radio said:? Contador, I assume you mean Froome. It would be good to see Froome's SRM file from that day. Vetoo gives him 6.5 w/kg for 21:41. Horner was at 6.85-6.95 w/kg for almost 17 minutes and 6.25 for 43.
Horner wins
why not?Race Radio said:So he was lying when Froome said after the Angrilu
sniper said:why not?
could be.
cyclists lie all the time.
do you think froome is telling the truth when he says he doesn't dope?
and regardless, he just said something in a post-stage interview, which i don't think we should subsequently interpret as a physiological truism.
Race Radio said:Certainly possible he was lying, maybe he was actually softpedaling. .....but I don't see him chopping 1:30 off or adding 40 watts. I also don't see any examples of Froome doing a performance that equals Horner's 6.25 w/kg for 43 minutes.
I doubt we will ever know the answer as I doubt we will ever see both of them at top form going head to head.
del1962 said:Have a look at that stage again
thehog said:I'm still not following.
What am I looking for?
lol, probably not, but the point is we cant really know if he really went full gas either, nor if he was as strong then as he is now.Race Radio said:Certainly possible he was lying, maybe he was actually softpedaling.
we've seen an example of froome accellerating uphill like we haven't seen anybody accellrate in a long time......but I don't see him chopping 1:30 off or adding 40 watts. I also don't see any examples of Froome doing a performance that equals Horner's 6.25 w/kg for 43 minutes.
Do you think Horner is blacklisted?I doubt we will ever know the answer as I doubt we will ever see both of them at top form going head to head
thehog said:Yes.
So what am I looking for?
thrawn said:Has Froome been in a race position (Vuelta 2011 aside) that would require him to try and make such an effort? I think it's hard to make a comparison until he does need to make that type of effort.
del1962 said:Horner dropping Froome on last climb, I thought you would be able to pick that up yourself
sniper said:lol, probably not, but the point is we cant really know if he really went full gas either, nor if he was as strong then as he is now.
we've seen an example of froome accellerating uphill like we haven't seen anybody accellrate in a long time.
I haven't seen Horner come up with such an accelleration.
but admittedly, we're comparing uphill performances from bottom to top, and for all I know horner might indeed be quicker at present than froome. But I wouldn't ignore the gutfeeling (for what thats worth) many here seem to have that Froome would actually have been quicker than Horner, should they have faced off in a 2013 GT.
Do you think Horner is blacklisted?
We have seen Horners bio - data over the last five years, yet the Tour of Poland and that enormous Brixia Tour are the missing ones for Froome. Must be a coincidence.Race Radio said:Very valid point. I don't think we have seen Froome go full gas on a 40 minute climb.
However flawed Grappe's analysis is he does point out that Froome's performance was stable over the last 2 years. This is possible as it seems much of his improvement in the last 2 years came in TT's.
His WT points are useless, not enough teams for competition.I don't think Horner is Blacklisted but teams see risk. Not just doping but age too. I can't image who would give him the 2 year contract he is looking for
Fearless Greg Lemond said:We have seen Horners bio - data over the last five years, yet the Tour of Poland and that enormous Brixia Tour are the missing ones for Froome. Must be a coincidence.
Froome went gungho on Axe 3 Domaines, for five K. Enough to decide the Tour. Too bad there were no SRM files released for that stage from anyone important so we would know if he has the same weight as Horner. Wouldnt surprise me though. No treshholds for aicar.His WT points are useless, not enough teams for competition.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:We have seen Horners bio - data over the last five years, yet the Tour of Poland and that enormous Brixia Tour are the missing ones for Froome. Must be a coincidence.
Froome went gungho on Axe 3 Domaines, for five K. Enough to decide the Tour. Too bad there were no SRM files released for that stage from anyone important so we would know if he has the same weight as Horner. Wouldnt surprise me though. No treshholds for aicar.His WT points are useless, not enough teams for competition.
the sceptic said:Obviously the 2011 version of Froome babysitting Wiggins is exactly the same Froome as in 2013. Nothing to see here.
