- Jun 22, 2009
- 10,644
- 2
- 0
That one worked out nicely.Squire said:C.Pineau over Izagirre @2.10
I like the first two as well, confident at least one will win.Badeend said:I'll again try 2 valuebets:
Sagan over Haussler @ 2.40 Unibet
Gavazzi over Dumoulin @2.44 Pinancle
And still thinking about this one. They expect pretty windy conditions and thats in favor of Roelandts but on a flat finish Gavazzi is faster then Roelandts. 3.08 is a lot for 2 riders that were only separated by just 3 places yesterday.
Gavazzi over Roelandts @ 3.08 Pinnacle
Gone with that one too.Badeend said:And still thinking about this one. They expect pretty windy conditions and thats in favor of Roelandts but on a flat finish Gavazzi is faster then Roelandts. 3.08 is a lot for 2 riders that were only separated by just 3 places yesterday.
Gavazzi over Roelandts @ 3.08 Pinnacle
Ah well, it was close. Damn you, Geraint Thomas!Squire said:Goss for the stage win @ 3.50
3.00 is definitely a lot. If it's 50/50 when both drop you still have value.gizzajob said:Henderson has said he will aim to get over it as well (or catch on the descent) as if he could pick up some bonuses could be in yellow. So like the look over him vs Goss @3 with B365 as if they both fail to get over it is maybe 50-50 who finishes first.
But then again, both of them not getting over the hill is the only scenario where it's 50/50. I think it's more likely that Goss gets over the hill and Henderson don't, and if both make it, Goss will always be favourite in a sprint. I'm not going to take that one, but good luck to those who do! 3.00 is a lot for a h2h afterall.Badeend said:3.00 is definitely a lot. If it's 50/50 when both drop you still have value.
Bike FAIL ruins my multiFerminal said:Kreuziger over Klöden 2.15 @ Centrebet
50/50 I think, just hoping Klöden is being lazy this race.
Sagan over Rojas * Weylandt over Steegmans 2.63
That was a nice bet!!!Squire said:Edit2: Added another one. This one's good.
Roche over Sylvain Chavanel @ 2.00
Nic Roche will probably find it worthwile contesting a reduced bunch sprint, and Chavanel is definitely no sprinter.
Yeah, but I lost the Feillu over Rojas one. First time Feillu is beaten by Rojas in this race. Won 2, lost 2 so far in P-N. Winnings pretty much evened out by losses.Badeend said:That was a nice bet!!!
Rojas punctured on stage 1 so that doesn't really count, though I thaught it was value anyway.Squire said:Yeah, but I lost the Feillu over Rojas one. First time Feillu is beaten by Rojas in this race. Won 2, lost 2 so far in P-N.
3.00 is high (3.15 at Pina) but 9 out of 10 times Haussler beats Rojas.Squire said:Yeah, but I lost the Feillu over Rojas one. First time Feillu is beaten by Rojas in this race. Won 2, lost 2 so far in P-N. Winnings pretty much evened out by losses.
What about Rojas over Haussler @ 3 for tomorrow? Both will surely be there for the sprint (which is what I think we will have), but I can't really see Rojas beating Haussler. At odds of 3 it could be value though.
Didn't go with the Rojas one, but will back Rojas against Sagan if I find out that the latter is injured. I see several bookies haven't dared putting Sagan in a h2h.Badeend said:3.00 is high (3.15 at Pina) but 9 out of 10 times Haussler beats Rojas.
Roche to beat Brajkovic, 1.75 is maybe a bit low. If we have a smaller pack Roche can sprint top 10, Brajkovic isnt able to do that.
Sportingbet has Rojas against Sagan.Squire said:Didn't go with the Rojas one, but will back Rojas against Sagan if I find out that the latter is injured. I see several bookies haven't dared putting Sagan in a h2h.
Euskaltel did come 2nd in the Vuelta 08 TTT with Martinez & Txurruka in the team, but unfortunately I think you are throwing your money out the window thereDamiano said:Lampre-Euskaltel, 2 @ 10,69 at Pinny. Couldn't resist it![]()
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
S | The 2023 CQ Ranking Manager Thread | Games and Fantasy Cycling | 665 | |
V | New Cycling Manager game coming up - VeloVerse Cycling | Games and Fantasy Cycling | 4 |