Maxiton said:
No doubt.
. And certainly understandable - see my earlier response in this thread. But even if it were technically feasable to do this, it beggers belief that a rider of Cance's caliber would risk EVERYTHING for the sake of a mere two races. The risk-to-benefit ratio is just way out of whack.
risk to benefit.....give me a motor or give me drugs to put in my body and risk my future health....hmmmm that's a hard one
get caught cheating with PED's 2 year ban, get caught cheating with a motor????anyone know the ban time?????
Riis proven cheater, would he use methods to cheat....
Why is this worse than doping? cheating is cheating, motorised doping is equivalent to PED's without the health risk....i know that i would choose it if i was to cheat...how would he get caught, no one is ratting on dopers, except supposedly lunatics like Landis, who has according to UCI's initial statement and LA, no credibility..
A bike like this just used in a race, not for training..well hell why not?..everyone is doping...we are all years behind the dopers and their methods....maybe we are behind the bikes too....maybe liquidgas have them....sure looked 'Postal' to me on the giro and we all know what that means....
personally for me its not far fetched....
as an aside i would also get rid of those ridiculous looking tt machines and go back to road bikes for TTs and the investment required for TT bikes invested in the youth of the sport and grass roots...