Re:

Yeah, it's a little awkward for the UCI that Sky has already announced its own punishment but I guess they'll have their own official word at some point. I've been mostly ok with how Sky has handled it but you do have to wonder if they went ahead and announced their punishment because he was due for a break and they knew waiting for the UCI would likely result in a ban during an important period or if it was because they felt it was the right thing to do for their team. I'll go ahead and give them credit for the latter.
I can think of several clinic guys who wished this had been the case for themRedheadDane said:Now he's gotten a ban, and when that is done he should be able to return with a clean slate*, just like everybody else returning from a ban, no matter why they got it.
*Not clean slate in the sense that we should pretend it never happened, but clean slate in the sense that it's a thing of the past, which won't define him for the rest of his career.
RedheadDane said:We know that UCI has launched an investigation to the case.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/uci-launches-investigation-into-team-sky-and-moscon-after-racial-abuse-of-reza-at-romandie/
Maybe Sky just knew that UCI isn't exactly known for being quick when it comes to these matters - just look at how long it took before Grivko got a punishment for his Kittel-punch during Dubai - so decided to punish him on their own immediatly (sp?).
UCI will probably hand out a verdict some time in September...
Yeah, it's a little awkward for the UCI that Sky has already announced its own punishment but I guess they'll have their own official word at some point. I've been mostly ok with how Sky has handled it but you do have to wonder if they went ahead and announced their punishment because he was due for a break and they knew waiting for the UCI would likely result in a ban during an important period or if it was because they felt it was the right thing to do for their team. I'll go ahead and give them credit for the latter.