If you don't care, then why post BS? Why make this about nationalism? Why assume a rider you don't seem to know that well can or can not do something, and then react like a child when pointed out your assumption is wrong? If i were to say Van Wilder is a bigger talent, it'd have nothing to do with being Belgian, but with him being a bigger talent. Have you maybe considered that? While you can see and feel i rate Honoré highly, which i have stressed in every post. What i find weird, is why a simple hypothesis about a rider leaving the team, because the competition at that team for his type of races is larger, and increasing, is turned into some nationalistic bias bullsht. That's what i find weird. But hey, there are 3 Belgian riders i have claimed to be the real deal, years before breaking through at the top level. Van Aert, Evenepoel and Van Wilder. So i can understand, with that track record, since Evenepoel and Van Aert turned out to be nobodies, that you would assume i'm just talking Van Wilder up because he's Belgian. L.O.L.Look I don't care at all about these details about races years ago, it's just that the need to consistently work out actual facts to always be in favor of belgian cyclist like some nation of Masnada is so weird.
I like both riders a lot and want to see em do well in the big races.
Oh, ignoring stages. Sure.Danish Nats, San Sebastián, Pologne, Druivenkoers, Bretagne, Britain, Primus Classic. No misses in between...
Maybe Honoré is more comparable to Mauro Schmid than Van Wilder?
As a type of rider, yes and no. I think Honoré has a wider base, but maybe lower top level potential, which would make him a better domestique than Schmid on hilly courses. I could see Honoré able to pull the peloton for a long time, which i don't know if Schmid would be able to do. But the thing wasn't so much about being comparable, rather than aiming for the same type of races. Evenepoel is nothing like Alaphilippe, but they will both be gunning for leadership in Liège, Lombardia etc.
Last edited: