• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Teams & Riders The Great Big Cycling Transfers, Extensions, and Rumours Thread

Page 374 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Well.... so much for Movistar being a potential suitor... lmao
Maybe things are different now because it would appear Ayuso is desperate to get out this UAE situation, but even if they had the funds Movistar never made much sense to me. They were the other suitor back when Ayuso was a junior with Bathco. Even the master Valverde himself travelled to Valencia poach him, but to no avail. Ayuso is very demanding when it comes to professionalism, and Movistar are just at amateur level compared to some of these other teams. INEOS or Red Bull is where I'd be looking at.
 
So this fits in with current situation in Vuelta, why would UAE not send a very popular, young, handsome, Spanish speaking rider to the premier race in Spain if you are trying to grow your brand, promote your team in all Spanish speaking markets of cycling fans?
But they are sending a young, popular, handsome, Spanish speaking rider to the Vuelta. His name is Isaac Del Toro.
 
But they are sending a young, popular, handsome, Spanish speaking rider to the Vuelta. His name is Isaac Del Toro.
I am a huge fan boy for sure..but someone may get real disappointing news as Vuelta turns up the heat..so it went diplomatic at first for sure, somebody from Vuelta called UAE and sweetened start money offer to include Ayuso. UAE said that they will think about it, or no. Vuelta goes w standard public pressure campaign, send bait stories to cycling websites and news outlets, all of what I am saying probably took a few hours and a few hundred Euros. So it's in a transfer teams best interest to see Ayuso head to head w some of the best, last GT of the season. It helps their branding.. If Bora is actually going after Remco the more positive media exposure he gets is good for their brand, their team.. I am just curious about where Ayuso fits as a leader.. Sounds like it's not UAE, Bora pretty crowded?
Del Toro is going to have millions of people seeing him on Latin American news and Mexico is @130 million w millions still watching evening news shows, he will have people routing for him that will never see him race.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
BTW, wasn't there new rules for transfers this season?

This is from the UCI rules online with the old text redacted:

A transfer period exists and applies to all changes of team, whether between two UCI
a WorldTeams or between a UCI WorldTeam and a UCI ProTeam.
The transfer period for any change of team during the season extends from 1-15 August.
For any change of team between two seasons, the transfer period extends from 1 August
to 31 December.

Two registration periods exist for the registration of riders with UCI WorldTeams.
The first registration period extends from 1 to 15 August and applies for registrations with
immediate effect during the season.
The second registration period extends from 15 October to 31 December and applies for
the registration of riders as from 1 January of the following year.
The registration periods apply for any rider registration with a UCI WorldTeam, whether
the rider was registered with another team or not at the time of the envisaged
registration.
The provisions in this section (2.15.120 to 2.15.125) apply both to teams which have UCI
WorldTeam status and applicants for a UCI WorldTour licence.


So why is there team news coming out today if the new date for transfers is October 15th?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
BTW, wasn't there new rules for transfers this season?

This is from the UCI rules online with the old text redacted:

A transfer period exists and applies to all changes of team, whether between two UCI
a WorldTeams or between a UCI WorldTeam and a UCI ProTeam.
The transfer period for any change of team during the season extends from 1-15 August.
For any change of team between two seasons, the transfer period extends from 1 August
to 31 December.

Two registration periods exist for the registration of riders with UCI WorldTeams.
The first registration period extends from 1 to 15 August and applies for registrations with
immediate effect during the season.
The second registration period extends from 15 October to 31 December and applies for
the registration of riders as from 1 January of the following year.
The registration periods apply for any rider registration with a UCI WorldTeam, whether
the rider was registered with another team or not at the time of the envisaged
registration.
The provisions in this section (2.15.120 to 2.15.125) apply both to teams which have UCI
WorldTeam status and applicants for a UCI WorldTour licence.


So why is there team news coming out today if the new date for transfers is October 15th?
You are assuming that it's a non hostile takeover.. If a team buys out the contract, you can say pretty much anything and everything, I would not value anything written by the UCI as even the paper it's printed on. Oil conglomerates and people like Richard Plugge, don't play by any rules ,they don't need to.
For any written UCI rules there are endless work arounds for those in control of the sport.. and to be clear, UCI is toothless
 
Ayuso should just do a Winston Bogarde, pisss around at the back with Froome until they get sick of him taking up a space on the team and wasting their money.

I get the impression that not letting him go isn't just a money/potential thing, he's San Milan's boy and he knows where the bodies are buried.

100 million release clause, they could sign Cristiano Ronaldo and have him cycle about a bit for that.
 
I don't know under the law of which country the contract was made up, but for example in Spain an employee, by rule, must have a release clause included in their contracts. What we often see with athletes is that the employer (i.e. the sporting club) puts these at ridiculous prices as a formality so the contract never gets bought out. The informal price is often much lower.
What gets complicated is work residency. A good rider has a corporate entity and is paid as contract worker. The payout of contract funds are likely to the contract entity or the contract worker as a resident of the most beneficial tax environment. That usually has great direct benefits for establishing foundations and other tax shelters, too.
If you're a new rider without a good agent and accountant you'll hate how short a professional sporting career can be so you need to protect every buck you make. And don't buy really expensive cars. Make sponsors loan them to you as part of a contract.
British personal income tax for a rider making over $150k pounds is 45%. Corporate tax is 25%, I think. Monaco is 0% on personal income.
 
Ayuso should just do a Winston Bogarde, pisss around at the back with Froome until they get sick of him taking up a space on the team and wasting their money.

I get the impression that not letting him go isn't just a money/potential thing, he's San Milan's boy and he knows where the bodies are buried.

100 million release clause, they could sign Cristiano Ronaldo and have him cycle about a bit for that.
Perchance; if he had two years left on his contract. But no way that he can out-wait them 5 years. So he will sulk the rest of this season as he is ordered to fetch bottles for Pogi, and then start from scratch and do as he is told next year.
 
He literally was like 100m off the 2nd place in Flanders this year. He was also top 8 best in LBL and came 2nd in Brabantse Pijl. Then didn't get selected for the Tour after preparing for it. Results don't show everything.

Will be a very valuable rider for Cofidis in the bigger races.
And Cofidis should hope for a very wet TdF, he's lethal in those rainy breakaway stages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StryderHells
Aug 31, 2023
146
214
1,230
UAE management love Ayuso. If Matxin had his own way Ayuso would be the priority/ leader. UAE aren’t letting him go for free and no one has 100 million sitting around to spent on him 🤷🏻‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
UAE management love Ayuso. If Matxin had his own way Ayuso would be the priority/ leader. UAE aren’t letting him go for free and no one has 100 million sitting around to spent on him 🤷🏻‍♀️

After one Tour stage (4?) they showed Matxin kissing Ayuso. So yeah, the affection is there! I'm curious how they will solve Vuelta situation - will Matxin just cut all speculations and force the Spaniard into the race?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
BTW, wasn't there new rules for transfers this season?

This is from the UCI rules online with the old text redacted:

A transfer period exists and applies to all changes of team, whether between two UCI
a WorldTeams or between a UCI WorldTeam and a UCI ProTeam.
The transfer period for any change of team during the season extends from 1-15 August.
For any change of team between two seasons, the transfer period extends from 1 August
to 31 December.

Two registration periods exist for the registration of riders with UCI WorldTeams.
The first registration period extends from 1 to 15 August and applies for registrations with
immediate effect during the season.
The second registration period extends from 15 October to 31 December and applies for
the registration of riders as from 1 January of the following year.
The registration periods apply for any rider registration with a UCI WorldTeam, whether
the rider was registered with another team or not at the time of the envisaged
registration.
The provisions in this section (2.15.120 to 2.15.125) apply both to teams which have UCI
WorldTeam status and applicants for a UCI WorldTour licence.


So why is there team news coming out today if the new date for transfers is October 15th?
Teams and riders can announce a transfer now but the contract can’t officially be signed until October 15th.

At least that’s how I read the new rules.
 
Simon Yates has signed for Visma rentbike, 2 years

View: https://x.com/vismaleaseabike/status/1819297862875759018?t=nub9OR756ydAFnKSPgMOqg&s=19


The sport is dying, only Richard Carapax can save us

Why is it dying, it's not like Yates has been doing much the last few seasons.

I get that everyone must *** and whine everytime UAE or Visma sign someone but at least there are two strong teams instead of just one.

And as the Ayuso case shows, there simply isn't room for all good riders in two teams so they will inevitably diffuse out to other teams in the end.
 
453743477_18445670305050416_2307391061570436137_n.jpg
 

Latest posts