131313 said:
While I share your disdain for Velonews, training can be harder than racing. It depends on the racing, and it depends on the training. I think most riders get more fit when training than racing, though it also depends on the rider.
To the second part, it was hardly pioneered by Armstrong. Ever since LeMond managed to do it, the top Grand Tour contenders have been racing less and training more. More riders would do it if they had that as an option.
What Lance pioneered was spinning current reality into something he "invented" in order to obfuscate a vary uncomfortable truth.
While I agree with what you are saying in principal. But in practice they are still trying to make the myth work, this time with Wiggo including the obligatory reference back to Wonderboy. It is so formulaic it's easy to spot.
Looking backwards it seems to me that's how they built the myth. The principals/facts aren't arguable in many ways. For example, training can be harder in some ways. For once, a Polish post above this one has legitimate examples. But as soon as you look into the specifics, it gets ridiculous as other posts have mentioned. Perhaps my historical favorite example being the Ed Coyle "research." This time Yates claims Tenerife has some magic that any number of places with lots of climbing and mild climate in Europe don't. It's ridiculous!
Either way, it reminds me of a young guy I just saw driving a very well preserved 70's Pontiac Firebird complete with calculator wrist watch on the arm hanging out the window. Both are the definition of irrelevance and borderline comic.
I say look for a Chris Carmichael vacation package to "train like the pros" for only $10,000 a week coming soon to a resort destination far, far away.