ebandit said:
..............so who next deserves extra scrutiny..........kenya...ethiopia....usa.............uk....oz......
Mark L
Each country is a different barrel of fish.
Ethiopia: Wild West. No NADO, no domestic testing except when IAAF comes (...). No organizational structure to set it up. Nothing to raid, no documents to subpoena, maybe some money changing hands through European banks.
Kenya: I bet the Kenyan Federation wants systematic doping, but is too incompetent to do it. Many in the bureaucracy would cut off their nose to spite their face, which will hopefully prove to be a good thing if future indicted individuals bring the ship down. A weird mix of corruption and total powerlessness as an athlete/agent may find themselves on the receiving end of pressure on Monday, and then laying it on officials on Tuesday.
US: Entrepreneurial doping, where bringing down Trevor Graham won't affect Jon Drummond's, Salazar's, or Li's operation. Big money involved, which could get police involved, but hard to take a broad swipe. Not to mention all of the foreign athletes that train in the US.
These cases are not dominoes waiting to fall. They're not even playing the same game.