Teams & Riders The "MVP" Mathieu Van der Poel Road Discussion Thread

Page 310 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 23, 2024
47
80
680
Always interesting to discuss the nuances of power output because it is such blanket term. Mathieu in an interview with Sporza at the start of the year said that power wise his best 30 min effort was in the E3 last year. At the end of the race on the stretch between the Tiegemberg and the finish line he averaged 460 watts.

I would guess that the gap that existed between Mathieu and Wout say 3-4 years ago in these kind of efforts, is no longer there.

He talks about his power output at 41:50.
 
Last E3 they rode against each other WVA won from MVDP and Pogi
that was not hte last e3, because last year they also raced eachother and VDP crushed everyone incl. WVA...who did crash stupidly, but only because he was desperate to get into VDP's wheel, after riding defensively the whole race. Ergo my point, he rides defensively vs VDP because he acknowledged the year before if he rides with VDP he gets crushed.

Also, 2 years ago he got dropped by Pogi and VDP on Kwaremont and only came back because of motos blocking Pogi's attack. He was the weakest of the three but also the fastest, so he won. But I wouldn't put that as a proof of him being more powerful or as strong, on the contrary. The proof was on the road
 
  • Like
Reactions: Didinho
Mar 23, 2024
47
80
680
His only chance is in PR since he doesn't want to race MSR.
It still saddens me to see Wout skip MSR. A rider of his skillset and caliber should always be on the start in my opinion. Totally understand him trying a different buildup but ride it anyway, who cares if its in the middle of a training camp. Get off the mountain the day before and fly in, next day ride the race and fly straight back. San Remo is the one races he can win against Pog and Mvdp without having to be stronger than them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poursuivant
I've read somewhere that Wout is more of a sugar burner, which could suggest that even during less intense efforts his power percentage resulting from glycolysis is higher than MVP's. This could affect him more during long classics, even with steady effort level. But it's all just speculation as we don't have detailed comparable data from both.
If correct that indicates a higher Vlamax which in turn makes your durability lesser. In principle you would like to run as much as possible on fat for every effort, which of course is not possible, but still.
 
If correct that indicates a higher Vlamax which in turn makes your durability lesser. In principle you would like to run as much as possible on fat for every effort, which of course is not possible, but still.
Not really. They are different adaptations, often down to specificity of training. Pogacar dropped an effort on PdB that probably requires a VO2 max of >100 or something, yet there is precious little to indicate that he struggles with endurance.

I also think Van Aert's struggles are more down to anaerobic repeats and recovery than strictly fat oxidation.
 
Not really. They are different adaptations, often down to specificity of training. Pogacar dropped an effort on PdB that probably requires a VO2 max of >100 or something, yet there is precious little to indicate that he struggles with endurance.

I also think Van Aert's struggles are more down to anaerobic repeats and recovery than strictly fat oxidation.
Not sure I follow this? As I understand (relative) VO2 max is desirable for climbers and grand tour contenders (like Pogacar and Vingegaard). But Vlamax (maximum rate of lactate production) is a more desirable attribute for riders with superior anaerobic power but at the cost of a lower anaerobic threshold (like Wout and MVDP).
 
Not sure I follow this? As I understand (relative) VO2 max is desirable for climbers and grand tour contenders (like Pogacar and Vingegaard). But Vlamax (maximum rate of lactate production) is a more desirable attribute for riders with superior anaerobic power but at the cost of a lower anaerobic threshold (like Wout and MVDP).

I think Red Rick confused VO2max with Vlamax. Obviously high VO2max is very important to any kind of sustainable performances (from a few minutes to a few hours). High Vlamax indicates very strong anaerobic glycolysis, which is crucial to performances lasting i.e. a few dozens of seconds. As for Van Aert I didn't necessarily mean this but rather that his glycolysis contributes more at a moderate effort level (it's easily cleared by his aerobic engine but precious fuel is still used up).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cookster15

TRENDING THREADS