Cal_Joe said:
Hey, thehog can, at times, be good for a chuckle. My concern is posting under multiple ID's especially when one ID pats the other on the back. That would be a serious breach of just about any forum rules, and a serious breach of trust. Trust and credibility form a major part of any online community.
I have been told that due to lack of funds on the part of cyclingnews and the rapid burnout rate of volunteer moderators that this forum is "community moderated". I would hope that "community moderation" would not involve putting blinders on when egregious conduct may be occurring.
I also find it interesting that a particular forum member has not returned to a thread where he has accounted for 21.2% of all posts in the thread. That percentage is obviously a minimum if there are indeed multiple accounts involved.
I smell a rat.
19 post newbie junior forum user states: " thehog can, at times, be good for a chuckle. My concern is posting under multiple ID's especially when one ID pats the other on the back. That would be a serious breach of just about any forum rules, and a serious breach of trust. Trust and credibility form a major part of any online community."
- So 19 posts in and you've already deduced I use multiple logins and I'm good for a chuckle. Surely you've been here longer to make such a conclusion? or you're just making this judgment of the back of handful of posts? Maybe, could it be, that you yourself have multiple logins and have been around here a lot longer than Cal_Jones?
This is very worrisome. Always be very careful when pointing fingers because there always 2 pointing back.Well in your case 236.
I suggest you spend more time posting here, enjoying the range of views expressed on the board and involve yourself in the discussions at hand. Joining a board 10 posts in and then slinging mud and throwing about IT terms lie proxy servers and IP addressees just makes you look silly. Even more so not one of your posts has actually been about cycling. If thats not all the hallmarks of a multiple login poster I don't know what is. Perhaps yourself got sloppy? You seem to know a lot about how to take on faux identities on forums.
To the question at hand; Similar to Lance Armstrong I welcome the CyclingNews Moderators to hack my account (with their lack funds), perform an audit on all my timestamps and do what is ever necessary to clear my name of these disgusting accusations. Extraordinary accusations require extraordinary proof.
So you have it. I'm clean and welcome the mods or whomever to check what they have to check to prove as such.
As for yourself I would suggest you reply to the posts at hand instead of attempting Lance Armstrong low-blows on my credibility. Or do you have some form of deficiency that does't allow you to debate the cycling related questions at posed on this forum?
Please don't respond to this post because you'll just look more silly than you already do and the whiff of common decency I have left I wouldn't want that for you.
Looking forward to your future cycling related posts.
...and don't forget to pick up your cheque from Demand
