I have the fix guys. It's not signing new riders, but a new DS.
I have a new DS in mind.
His name is Antonio Conte
I have a new DS in mind.
His name is Antonio Conte
If Roglic shoulder is really hurt I think they will change plans and bring Lipowitz to the Tour. of course not with the Goal of podium but more as a let's rolle the dice and see like with Kämna a few years ago. They could also bring van Poppel and Meeus to try for a surprise sprint victory. Maybe it's possible to get van Gils into form again?
Martinez and Tratnik can be left out of the team if roglic doesn't start.
Time to invite Remco for coffee....I wouldn't delve too much into it, that is it's reasonable to expect some *** like that to emerge when you are a bit down:
![]()
Roglic als Millionen-Problem - Chance für Lipowitz?
www.sueddeutsche.de
It's all over this forum too, ageism. Furthermore i don't feel youngsters like Lipowitz or Pellizzari are representing any real issue here. They earned their spot and i am sure that leadership role is open. And even the critics admit, that replacing Rogla with such youngsters, that doesn't come down to winning GTs, especially Tour. So basically they are creating problems and not offering better solutions. In the end they need Rogla, it's not like there is a choice involved, he is consistent stage racing powerhouse. As for the more mature support riders, lets see on how week three goes. And Jai can't really be blamed for getting injured, so who knows on what level of support we would see in week three from his side. Week three of Giro and then the Tour, then we can asses some more. If there was improvement being made in regards to the team support. One of the biggest issues still remaining is positioning. Team can do a great job at it or still can fall short.
I was gonna post the same, of course the German media will go full blown gc Lipopotamus at the Tour hypetrain now...I wouldn't delve too much into it, that is it's reasonable to expect some *** like that to emerge when you are a bit down:
![]()
Roglic als Millionen-Problem - Chance für Lipowitz?
www.sueddeutsche.de
It's all over this forum too, ageism. Furthermore i don't feel youngsters like Lipowitz or Pellizzari are representing any real issue here. They earned their spot and i am sure that leadership role is open. And even the critics admit, that replacing Rogla with such youngsters, that doesn't come down to winning GTs, especially Tour. So basically they are creating problems and not offering better solutions. In the end they need Rogla, it's not like there is a choice involved, he is consistent stage racing powerhouse. As for the more mature support riders, lets see on how week three goes. And Jai can't really be blamed for getting injured, so who knows on what level of support we would see in week three from his side. Week three of Giro and then the Tour, then we can asses some more. If there was improvement being made in regards to the team support. One of the biggest issues still remaining is positioning. Team can do a great job at it or still can fall short.
Then there just isn't a solution for BoraFrankly Evenepoel over Roglic doesn't change a lot when it comes to gc potential at the Tour, unless he'd improve a ton after leaving Quickstep and I doubt that.
Tend to agree, though you can see where a team might bet on Evenepoel improving versus Roglic declining.Frankly Evenepoel over Roglic doesn't change a lot when it comes to gc potential at the Tour, unless he'd improve a ton after leaving Quickstep and I doubt that.
The budget to get the best of the best in every regard? The idea that he’s better surrounded there, and they are able to get the best out of him and his career?Tend to agree, though you can see where a team might bet on Evenepoel improving versus Roglic declining.
The question I have is why would Evenepoel come to Bora from a performance/career POV? They've yet to show they're a great place to be a GT/GC contender. Sure, money and Specialized are reasons, but I wonder if they have any/much appeal beyond that for a rider like Remco.
Yeah fair, I'm just unconvinced that's actually the case, despite my misgivings about him remaining at SQS.The budget to get the best of the best in every regard? The idea that he’s better surrounded there, and they are able to get the best out of him and his career?
At least that’s what I think they are using as a selling point.
Time to invite Remco for coffee....
They might not insist he focus on GTs. Red Bull wants to promote winning riders. Remco and MvP are prime examples of a promotable, popular and charismatic athletes. Roglic can ride out his contract while they cultivate the next big thing....or poach one from another team.Tend to agree, though you can see where a team might bet on Evenepoel improving versus Roglic declining.
The question I have is why would Evenepoel come to Bora from a performance/career POV? They've yet to show they're a great place to be a GT/GC contender. Sure, money and Specialized are reasons, but I wonder if they have any/much appeal beyond that for a rider like Remco.
But Remco has really been pretty clear on his goals, and he wants to win GTs. Maybe that’s changed, but I would be a bit surprised?They might not insist he focus on GTs. Red Bull wants to promote winning riders. Remco and MvP are prime examples of a promotable, popular and charismatic athletes. Roglic can ride out his contract while they cultivate the next big thing....or poach one from another team.
Remco's been coached and managed in a vacuum.But Remco has really been pretty clear on his goals, and he wants to win GTs. Maybe that’s changed, but I would be a bit surprised?
How so? What did he do that showed this? By riding a good TT?In my opinion, Roglic showed at the Giro that he is still one of the best riders in the peloton.
He was in 5th position 2 days before the rest day. He had still all chances for a top 3 result or more. He was 2 days in the leader jersey. All that in the end is 3 crashes. So why do you think he was not in shape?How so? What did he do that showed this? By riding a good TT?
I never doubted he was one of the best in the peloton for GT's, I just don't think he showed it at the GiroHe was in 5th position 2 days before the rest day. He had still all chances for a top 3 result or more. He was 2 days in the leader jersey. All that in the end is 3 crashes. So why do you think he was not in shape?
0.24 seconds away from the win in the stage 2 ITT while Tarling was considered to have had the better wind as well as catching his minute man.I never doubted he was one of the best in the peloton for GT's, I just don't think he showed it at the Giro
Yeah that's what I asked Links2003. Is it purely because he rode a great ITT that would show he's one of the best? Because I don't see that as good enough. You can ride a good ITT, and still not be good. Look at Evenepoel in Dauphine 2024.0.24 seconds away from the win in the stage 2 ITT while Tarling was considered to have had the better wind as well as catching his minute man.
Who is saying that? And what's with the ageism and crashing the whole time?Are you guys seriously going to dispute Rogličes ability to win GTs? Good luck with that one. As ageism doesn't bear fruit, just say Rogla crashes a lot. Like the rest of the peloton, including Remco.
Anyway, if Remco wants to join Red Bull – BORA – hansgrohe, that is ultimately his decision.
Who is saying that? And what's with the ageism and crashing the whole time?