Teams & Riders The Remco Evenepoel is the next Eddy Merckx thread

[kingjr]

Candy? 🤔

Stuff with sugar in it

 

[The fridge in the blue trees]

You realize that one of those 2 is Evenepoel's performance on Lo Port when he was beaten by Roglic, right? Does that seem like the best evidence to cite? To me that undercuts this whole, "top 3 greatest performances ever" narrative:

We are discussing climbing, and actual calculated w/kg and climb times. Not just random person saying this was the 3rd best performance...

But you saw Remco, and 3rd best performance and got red in front of your eyes

But VayaVayaVaya's point shows that calling it the third best performance of the 21st century is simply not what this data says.

Third best w/kg, okay, but that doesn't automatically make it the third best performance. Roglic lower w/kg on Lo Port, but he beat Remco . So sorry, Roglic's performance was better. in the end it's only 1 thing that counts, the time. Arensman's Monte Grappa, crazy numbers he said, but after gaining 2,5 kg during the Giro.... I hope nobody in his right mind would call it one of his best or possibly his best performance.
Be precise, third best w/kg performance of the 21st century, no objection there, but also don't care that much actually.

In the meantime I'll still consider other climbs, say Vingegaard Granon, as better.

Evenepoel was third Sunday, a hard stage that was ridden pretty much full gas the whole day, excellent performance, gained a minute on the next rider, almost 2 on the guy one further back. Excellent. But doesn't mean that he would have beaten Vingegaard on Granon. Or Loze. Or Pogacar on the way to Le Grand Bornand. The day they change the general classification to w/kg we can talk about it again, in the meantime he just did an excellent ride beaten by the 2 guys that for the moment are simply lightyears, or wattyears if you want above the rest.

 

[LesDiablesRouges]

Why is that reasonable? Because they didn't come even close to such records just 5 years ago. Nevermind breaking it by 3+ minutes. If you had told people in 2019 that in 5 years, riders would climb 5-10% faster than Pantani, you would have been ridiculed. But now it is suddenly "reasonable".

2010-2019: 10% slower than Pantani.

2024: 10% faster than Pantani.

"Better nutrition."

Because 2010-2019 didn't have generational talents.

 

[LesDiablesRouges]

He can but he needs to improve a lot to catch those two (and they can't improve at all).

There's an asymptotic ceiling on improvement the better you get the less room there is too improve, I'm not sure how much more Pogacar can improve at this point. He already looks like a skeleton. Remco is much thinner than he has been but he still has more weight to lose to look like a malnourished alien like Tadej and Jonas.

 

[Valv.Piti]

What's that?

I suppose its riders that breaks the rules of what we think can be possible or at least simply are just more talented than their peers. Every sports has those unique characters - Michael Jordan, Leo Messi, Usain Bolt etc. Every 20th year or whatever, there comes this one guy that just kinda defies everything we know. During the 10's, I think we saw some relatively weak Tour winners to be fair and also at the back end of the 00's due to Operacion Puerto. I think the field lacked talent to some extent even though you obviously still had riders like Schleck, Evans, Nibali, Froome, Quintana and especially Contador, but none of these were particularly generational even though you can argue Contador had an absolutely great 07-11 run and Froome 13-18. But they doesn't have what Pog has, actually not even close.

 

[LesDiablesRouges]

What are you blabbering about? We are talking about climbs here.

Evenepoel did the best climbing performance of the 21st century, if not for those two guys who crushed him by 2 and 3 minutes.

I have no idea why this continues to be parrotted as some sort of truth when it is incredibly disingenious and not even correct . Guess people are just going to ignore Basso on Mont Bondone in 2006.

It's not even the third best climbing performance of the last weekend, but somehow people can't even remember Pogacar's Pla D'Adet climbing performance where he broke the climbing record for Pla D'Adet by nearly two minutes.

 

[AmRacer]

I suppose its riders that breaks the rules of what we think can be possible or at least simply are just more talented than their peers. Every sports has those unique characters - Michael Jordan, Leo Messi, Usain Bolt etc. Every 20th year or whatever, there comes this one guy that just kinda defies everything we know. During the 10's, I think we saw some relatively weak Tour winners to be fair and also at the back end of the 00's due to Operacion Puerto. I think the field lacked talent to some extent even though you obviously still had riders like Schleck, Evans, Nibali, Froome, Quintana and especially Contador, but none of these were particularly generational even though you can argue Contador had an absolutely great 07-11 run and Froome 13-18. But they doesn't have what Pog has, actually not even close.

Regarding Teddy Merckx, you must go further back in time.

 

[LesDiablesRouges]

What's that?

A talent that only comes around once in a generation. Ironically there are two currently. I do not count Jonas because he doesn't win important one day races.

 

[LesDiablesRouges]

It's based on the calculations of lanternerouge.com and nothing more than that.

Greatest Climbing Performances Of All-Time on Plateau de Beille | Tour de France 2024 Stage 15 - Lanterne Rouge

Tadej Pogačar and Jonas Vingegaard both did the best and second-best climbing performance of all time on the Plateau de Beille climb, making this the greatest climbing stage of all time.

lanternerouge.com

Please keep up before you throw a hissy fit.

Not my problem when you cannot read graphs from links that you post.

You literally said 3rd best climb of the 21st centruy and that is not true.

Do not not see the curve on the bottom graph and notice the blue dot that's way above the Remco dot?

That's literally far above Remco's performance for a longer time.

 

[Taxus4a]

It's based on the calculations of lanternerouge.com and nothing more than that.

Greatest Climbing Performances Of All-Time on Plateau de Beille | Tour de France 2024 Stage 15 - Lanterne Rouge

Tadej Pogačar and Jonas Vingegaard both did the best and second-best climbing performance of all time on the Plateau de Beille climb, making this the greatest climbing stage of all time.

lanternerouge.com

Please keep up before you throw a hissy fit.

Maybe all that is true, but almedia is not one of the greaters climber of this era, whatever the numbers said.

Of course he is doing a very good Tour and he is climbing very well. He was quite far fron his team mate, but anyway a good performance if you look at history. It is one of the best performances of Landa for sure in numbers, but in terms of proportional level whenj he droped Contador at Finestre for me is another level. I dont compare con tador with Jonas or Pogacar, they are much better riders and climbers, but Contador should be at least as good climber as Evenepoel is today (he will improve, for sure, at least a little)

 

[VayaVayaVaya]

Want some candy?
These two have really embraced each other.When its properly nr 1 and 2 rider in the world its just really awesome!

https://twitter.com/x/status/1813266866514649311

View: https://x.com/LeTour/status/1813266866514649311

There's an asymptotic ceiling on improvement the better you get the less room there is too improve, I'm not sure how much more Pogacar can improve at this point. He already looks like a skeleton. Remco is much thinner than he has been but he still has more weight to lose to look like a malnourished alien like Tadej and Jonas.

I dunno...I would have agreed without seeing that photo that was posted immediately before, but Remco seems much more vascular. Probably just a quirk of Tadej's physiology, though.

I have no idea why this continues to be parrotted as some sort of truth when it is incredibly disingenious and not even correct . Guess people are just going to ignore Basso on Mont Bondone in 2006.

It's not even the third best climbing performance of the last weekend, but somehow people can't even remember Pogacar's Pla D'Adet climbing performance where he broke the climbing record for Pla D'Adet by nearly two minutes.

Exactly. People (fans of riders who are being exalted here) are blindly regurgitating this, forgetting a few things:

1. These are imperfect estimates
2. LR, as much as I like their podcast, have a history of sensationalism, particularly hyping certain riders
3. Context matters
4. Don't forget the eye test (as Taxus indicates below)
5. Winning matters!

Maybe all that is true, but almedia is not one of the greaters climber of this era, whatever the numbers said.

Of course he is doing a very good Tour and he is climbing very well. He was quite far fron his team mate, but anyway a good performance if you look at history. It is one of the best performances of Landa for sure in numbers, but in terms of proportional level whenj he droped Contador at Finestre for me is another level. I dont compare con tador with Jonas or Pogacar, they are much better riders and climbers, but Contador should be at least as good climber as Evenepoel is today (he will improve, for sure, at least a little)

Exactly. You can cite all the numbers you want, but you're not going to convince me that Landa, 9 years after he dropped Contador on Finestre, is a better climber now riding as pack fodder than he was then. Or that Almeida and Buitrago are suddenly better climbers than Roglic or than peak Froome or Contador or Lance.

I said that because that is what lanternerouge.com said:


But I see your point about Basso and the graphic.

Maybe they didn't include Pogacar and Vingegaard's PdB ascents in that statement.

They are conflating "best estimated watts/kilogram during a climb that LR has selected from the database for consideration" with "best performance." Winning matters. I'm prepared to admit that Pogacar might have had the best climbing performance (or as good as any) yesterday, but telling me getting third, down by 2.5 minutes, all in the last few kilometers is better than any of the stunning performances we've had all century, or even in the last 3 years? Come on. Maybe it has a higher watts/kg estimate using their assumptions and calculation, but it's not better, and Remco wouldn't have dominated the last 4 Tours.

 

[Berniece]

A bit disappointing, but Evenepoel isn’t going to attack and only look to riders behind him in the GC. He just wants the podium and has no intentions to go for more. I get why, since it’s his first Tour, but still…

 

[Wvv]

A bit disappointing, but Evenepoel isn’t going to attack and only look to riders behind him in the GC. He just wants the podium and has no intentions to go for more. I get why, since it’s his first Tour, but still…

Tbh, I rather have him end the Tour smart and keep enough in the tank for an olympic gold, than otherwise.

 

[houtdffan]

oh, QS is confident he will beat Vingo. See the article in the race thread here and in the clinic

 

[Karl Merckx]

oh, QS is confident he will beat Vingo. See the article in the race thread here and in the clinic

link ?

 

[ManicJack]

A bit disappointing, but Evenepoel isn’t going to attack and only look to riders behind him in the GC. He just wants the podium and has no intentions to go for more. I get why, since it’s his first Tour, but still…

Link?

 

[scribers]

Link?

 

[Oldermanish]

It doesn't for this purpose. Winner of TdF 2019 stage 14 Thibaut Pinot was not stronger than the second of TdF 2024 Stage 15 Jonas Vingegaard. In fact, the latter was way stronger than the former.


Evenepoel broke Pantani's PdB record by ~40 seconds. He was almost 3 minutes faster than the elite group of 2015, including Froome.

Just look at the result then:

1.​

POGACAR Tadej

UAD

5h13'55"​

80​

2.​

VINGEGAARD HANSEN Jonas

TVL

01'08"​

50​

3.​

EVENEPOEL Remco

SOQ

02'51"​

35​

4.​

LANDA MEANA Mikel

SOQ

03'54"​

25​

5.​

ALMEIDA Joao Pedro Gonçalves

UAD

04'43"​

15​

6.​

YATES Adam

UAD

04'56"​

10​

7.​

BUITRAGO SANCHEZ Santiago

TBV

05'08"​

5​

8.​

RODRIGUEZ CANO Carlos

IGD

05'08"​

3​

9.​

CARAPAZ MONTENEGRO Richard Antonio

EFE

05'41"​

2​

10.​

GALL Felix

DAT

05'57"​

1​

Forget about W/Kg, Pogacar was nearly 5 minutes faster than the rider in fifth place. On a 40-45 minute climb. That is more than a 10% difference. Someone like Rodriguez isn't a random pleb rider, he's the leader of INEOS, and excels at these type of efforts.

If you remove Pogacar and Vingegaard from the results, Evenepoel won by a minute, and was two minutes faster than the rider in third place.

The guy in 5th Place? You mean the guy that ran domestique work for him 4 two weeks...his teammate? He was responding to cover the fact that no one else had a teammate up the road; as he should. Yates could probably explain the tactical elements of racing but let's not confuse the wattage output as a basis of greatness.

 

[houtdffan]

link ?

See my post. It directs you to the race thread here and in the clinic

 

[Logic-is-your-friend]

Not my problem when you cannot read graphs from links that you post.

You literally said 3rd best climb of the 21st centruy and that is not true.

Do not not see the curve on the bottom graph and notice the blue dot that's way above the Remco dot?

That's literally far above Remco's performance for a longer time.

The article mentions it as 3rd best climbing performance. Not sure whether that is because they overlooked Basso's Bondone climb and screwed up, or whether they calculated different parameters (altitude etc) into the effort or the length and difficulty of the stage, which in all cases (altitude, length, difficulty) the Giro stage of 2006 was a lot easier. It doesn't really matter much either, whether it is 3rd or 4th. Point is that it is up there, and also beyond Pog's and Vinge's previous efforst.

 

[Logic-is-your-friend]

Link?

Link?

See my post. It directs you to the race thread here and in the clinic

I'm not seeing any directions or links towards a post with a link or a link. I've even gone into the clinic thread which i usually don't do and did not find a link like you said.

 

[Andre]

Want some candy?
These two have really embraced each other.When its properly nr 1 and 2 rider in the world its just really awesome!

https://twitter.com/x/status/1813266866514649311

View: https://x.com/LeTour/status/1813266866514649311

Remco don't take candy from him...he's your enemy

 

[scribers]

Frienemy

 

[houtdffan]

Link?


I'm not seeing any directions or links towards a post with a link or a link. I've even gone into the clinic thread which i usually don't do and did not find a link like you said.

You obviously didn't look because it would hit you in the face in the first post of the thread

Mikel Landa has "little doubt" that Remco Evenepoel can still contest second place at Tour de France against Jonas Vingegaard

Mikel Landa is the best Spaniard in the Tour de France classification. He is fifth, with Joao Almeida only a few seconds ahead of him and Carlos Rodriguez close behind. So far he has always stayed alo...

cyclinguptodate.com

 

[Logic-is-your-friend]

You obviously didn't look because it would hit you in the face in the first post of the thread

Mikel Landa has "little doubt" that Remco Evenepoel can still contest second place at Tour de France against Jonas Vingegaard

Mikel Landa is the best Spaniard in the Tour de France classification. He is fifth, with Joao Almeida only a few seconds ahead of him and Carlos Rodriguez close behind. So far he has always stayed alo...

cyclinguptodate.com

Thanks for the link. However, i did look, in the clinic in Evenepoel's topic and in the stage 15 topic. When i go back to the first post in that topic, i still see no link to the article you posted above.
https://forum.cyclingnews.com/threads/tour-de-france-stage-15-post-race-thread.39811/

As for your orignal statement:

oh, QS is confident he will beat Vingo. See the article in the race thread here and in the clinic

I do not find anything remotely similar in the article you posted. First of all, it's not SQS, but simply Landa's opinion, and furthermore, i don't see any such declarations by him. Basically "the team is sure he will beat Vingegaard" becomes "Landa thinks he still has a chance to beat Vingegaard".