Teams & Riders The Remco Evenepoel is the next Eddy Merckx thread

Page 1154 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
So he needs 6 months to be top and Vingegaard, who had a worse crash, basically 6 weeks? Something doesn't add up. Why can't he be top early April after a thorough training camp in March?
Because we want to see him peak in TDF and WC later in the season. Otherwise you get another season like 2021 where the build up to the Giro was too quick, and he didn't perform that well the rest of the season. You need a proper base, otherwise you can't have long sustainable peaks.

Also what Red Rick said.
 
Evenepoel maakte ook indruk op zijn ploegmaats, hij "reed goed mee" volgens hen. Volgens HLN is het dan ook de bedoeling om Evenepoel eind maart of begin april te laten aansluiten op de hoogtestage van de ploeg voor de Giro op de Sierra Nevada.

Voor die Giro zijn Mikel Landa en Valent Paret-Peintre de kopmannen, Evenepoel zal er toewerken naar zijn rentree in de Brabantse Pijl op 18 april. Vroeger zal Evenepoel normaal zijn rentree niet maken.

Na de Amstel Gold Race, de Waalse Pijl en Luik-Bastenaken-Luik zal Evenepoel waarschijnlijk ook aan de Ronde van Romandië (29 april tot 5 mei) meedoen. Begin juni zou Evenepoel dan aan de start staan van de Dauphiné.
Not sure if i'm allowed to copy paste from an article like that or not.
However, seems like he'll be doing altitude training soon (end of march/start of april).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Berniece
A little bit strange. Is he trying to peak for Ardennes? If not, why is he going to altitude? Strange decision but I hope they know what they are doing.
Not strange at all. It is not like altitude training is only having short term benefit and are used only to reach peak form. Altitude training is used across many endurance sports also for long term benefit. It makes great sense to get in one longer altitude camp now and then another long one before Dauphine and maybe even a shorter one between Dauphine and NC (but there I suspect the altitude hotel could be seen as an better option).
 
After seeing him closely I wouldn’t call him Fatco. Although he was getting something to eat here halfway his 6 hour ride.



Does anyone know here if the pro riders are allowed to ride on the road where it’s not a 70km/h one? He’s got a back light but it’s just insane he does these speeds if you should ride on the bad bike lanes here. Is there a rule or something in Belgium?
 
After seeing him closely I wouldn’t call him Fatco. Although he was getting something to eat here halfway his 6 hour ride.



Does anyone know here if the pro riders are allowed to ride on the road where it’s not a 70km/h one? He’s got a back light but it’s just insane he does these speeds if you should ride on the bad bike lanes here. Is there a rule or something in Belgium?
If there is bike lane on his side of the road, he should use the bike lane. On that picture it looks like he is juming of a sidewalk with a parking zone. It's not where he should ride anyway because it's the wrong side of the road. The exception would be a bike lane with markings to ride in two directions.

To be honest, in areas with almost no traffic and a bad bikelane (e.g on bad pavement) I take the road.
 
Not strange at all. It is not like altitude training is only having short term benefit and are used only to reach peak form. Altitude training is used across many endurance sports also for long term benefit. It makes great sense to get in one longer altitude camp now and then another long one before Dauphine and maybe even a shorter one between Dauphine and NC (but there I suspect the altitude hotel could be seen as an better option).
Not so much longer term benefit—The boosted HCT (due to hypoxia at altitude) returns to the prior baseline HCT after about two weeks.
 
If there is bike lane on his side of the road, he should use the bike lane. On that picture it looks like he is juming of a sidewalk with a parking zone. It's not where he should ride anyway because it's the wrong side of the road. The exception would be a bike lane with markings to ride in two directions.

To be honest, in areas with almost no traffic and a bad bikelane (e.g on bad pavement) I take the road.
Yeah I know where it is because it’s my photo. He just started again after a little stop getting food and drinks.
But I meant I always ride on the bike lanes, but 75% of them are so bad with a lot of cracks and bumps or even dirt/gravel. Can’t imagine Remco riding those for 6h+.

Was just wondering if pro riders have an exception.
 
By law you are obligated to ride the bycicle lane IF there is one available AND if it's capable of being ridden. Now I do not know how the exact interpretation of capable of being ridden is. Cause where I live, their are bike lanes that are intermittent (hey exist for a third of a street, suddenly gone, and maybe back at the end of the street) and full of potholes/bumps/cracks from people working on their house and then not putting the stones back properly. As well as stones and debris from driveways.

If car drivers had to use those bike lanes on a daily basis they be complaining loudly to their local government. (Speaking of which, the asphalt car lanes are well maintained). So I don't use those bike lanes most of the time where I live. They are a hassle and actually somewhat dangerous. Completely defeating their purpose. If police ever feels the need to tell me i need to use those particular bike lanes, i'm not sure who will be in the right. I imagine it will come down to the interpretation of the law.

Bike lanes have improved in flanders, (and waaaaay ahead of bike lanes in wallonia where they are almost non-existant), but most of the time they aren't half as decent to ride as the asphalt car lanes are. So I'd imagine most pro cyclist who ride faster than me would tend to drive on the road unless they are on a cycle highway, have acces to a properly maintained bike lane... stuff like that. Fully legal or not.

In any case pro cyclist aren't exceptions. They are expected to abide by the law like any other citizen.

Also now that i think about it, i'm gonna check if they actually put up bike lane signs. Where those bike lanes are intermittent where i live. Might be they removed them long ago, or never put them up, in which case they aren't official bike lanes just walkways. In any case i can think of plenty bike lanes near me that i do tend to use but i can't help but think they are downright terrible. But not so terrible that i stop riding on them. But might be dangerous for a pro rider to ride on at 40km. And would therefore choose to ride on the road instead. There are however a few bike lanes where the traffic is lighter and they are in such terrible condition that I (and most others) just ignore the bike lane and drive on the roads as mentioned before. So Imagine pro riders would def. not ride on those.

I'd be curious if a case ever comes to court, how the judge would decide, based on the condition of the bike lane. I suppose it might also depend on the judge.
 
Last edited:
Yeah I know where it is because it’s my photo. He just started again after a little stop getting food and drinks.
But I meant I always ride on the bike lanes, but 75% of them are so bad with a lot of cracks and bumps or even dirt/gravel. Can’t imagine Remco riding those for 6h+.

Was just wondering if pro riders have an exception.
If I´m not mistaken, you can´t ride more than 30km/h on a bikelane. If faster, you have to use the main road.
 

TRENDING THREADS