I don't think anyone would/could dispute that.Plenty of bike riders improve their bike handling during their career. It's not that static. Pogacar now is clearly a better bike handler than he was when he came onto the scene.
I don't think anyone would/could dispute that.Plenty of bike riders improve their bike handling during their career. It's not that static. Pogacar now is clearly a better bike handler than he was when he came onto the scene.
And some riders doesnt improve?Plenty of bike riders improve their bike handling during their career. It's not that static. Pogacar now is clearly a better bike handler than he was when he came onto the scene.
No. They already had a contract and set buyout prices that no one would match.
First of all they have to wait until August before they can say anything. If they are still negotiating it makes sense to say he’s staying. This year is the last year they can get some decent money for him, so if you want to go back to a more classics team now is a great time.And they still do? Or do you reckon SOQ already made a deal behind the scenes and is feeding BS to media?
First of all they have to wait until August before they can say anything. If they are still negotiating it makes sense to say he’s staying. This year is the last year they can get some decent money for him, so if you want to go back to a more classics team now is a great time.
Remco would never do the latter, otherwise he could’ve already leftSo we seem to agree that the deal with SOQ was likely not made, up to this point, and that SOQ never really moved on from its classics heritage. It's similar at RBH, hard to break that patterns. So either they make the deal, or Remco to stay at SOQ till the end of contract or to do a Cian or van Aert. I would strongly recommend against doing the latter.
No. Remco is gone. All there is left is contract details with RBH.So we seem to agree that the deal with SOQ was likely not made, up to this point, and that SOQ never really moved on from its classics heritage. It's similar at RBH, hard to break that patterns. So either they make the deal, or Remco to stay at SOQ till the end of contract or to do a Cian or van Aert. I would strongly recommend against doing the latter.
Remco would never do the latter, otherwise he could’ve already left
No. Remco is gone. All there is left is contract details with RBH.
They made a legit effort to reshape the team around GT / Remco, and we can all see from where they spent their budget that they definitely moved on from being a classics team. Lefevre was the glue for Remco, and the leadership and vision for the team. I think when he left, the die was cast.
They will go back to being a classics team, and are making moves in that direction already.
I don't think anyone's making fools of themselves, I think it's just the general public roster smokescreens, there are things they can and can't talk about.So basically SOQ is making a fool of themself claiming otherwise? As for legit effort to reshape the team around Remco and moving on form being a classics team. So in your opinion the Tour 2025 SOQ team is a legit GT GC team?
I don't think anyone's making fools of themselves, I think it's just the general public roster smokescreens, there are things they can and can't talk about.
To the latter, it doesn't matter what anyone thinks. They tried to form a GC team. Remco is leaving and they're moving back to the roots. Not really much more to it than that.
Well, that brings us right back around to Tom Pidcock who regularly does. I think that you might be surprised by how many pros work on bike handling while they are out hammering away everyday. The direct answer to your question would be, any pro who could benefit from it...ie: Remco.which pro road racer actually spends (wastes)time on specific technique training?
which was exactly where he was yesterday.he spent 2 years in junior category riding 95% of the time in front of the peloton,
I don't know, but as I said above, I think Fore is trying to save some face. But honestly I have no idea.I mean if SOQ is on board and the deal is done, why would they then go on with such public statements, they would remain silent?
The bolded is not something one can "read" from what I said. Maybe just go with...what I actually said. I don't think that's true, but it's such a subjective statement that I honestly have no idea how one would determine if that's the case.I will read that as yeah, they failed to build a legit GT GC team and to cut the ties with their classics heritage, something that is plaguing RBH too, slow progress.
I've already addressed both.@red_flanders
OK so we agree to disagree, one more question from my side, why is in your opinion then Remco leaving if SOQ has a legit GT GC team?
I typed this a few days ago (I didn't use 'will ever' though). RE has a direct/personal contract with Specialized in addition to the team contract (s).They are something of an akward hybrid. Not bad in either, but not good in either as well. (@soudal)
Ineos does not ride with specialized. I don't think Remco will ever leave specialized.
I do think a buyout will happen. It won't be near as messy as with Van Aert and porbably less messy than with Cian as well.
I've already addressed both.
Well, that brings us right back around to Tom Pidcock who regularly does. I think that you might be surprised by how many pros work on bike handling while they are out hammering away everyday. The direct answer to your question would be, any pro who could benefit from it...ie: Remco.
I remember reading an editorial from one of the USA racers who was on Discovery with Il Falco, and he talked about how following him everyday not only made the TEAM better at descending, but it made USA guy better at crits when he was winding down his career. I'll give a shot of tequila to whoever can remember who that was. I don't think that David Z and he overlapped, but that's who keeps popping into my head. One other one in my head Creed?
which was exactly where he was yesterday.
You like to invite people down a trail only to push them off of a cliff before you take another trail.Somebody simply needs to teach him to hit the correct lines. And it doesn't matter whether that is a cyclist, a biker or a baker. But chances are that somebody who is used to take those lines, and is able to spot them and decide to take them at 200km per hour, a few hundred times per hour will know what he's talking about.
It is his main issue on the bike, cornering. And this becomes a real problem in descents and on technical circuits. For all other issues, like bike handling, obviously yes, a cyclist would be a far better coach. For this specific problem, his main issue, no not really.
They are related. There is seeing the corner with your eyes, and there is seeing the corner with your brain (reading the corner). When you don't see the corner, your brain automatically makes the wrong decision in a reflex, to steer into the corner sooner, because your instincts fear of going out of the corner on the outside and your fear dictates to get away from the outside of the corner. This is always what happens. The result is the exact opposite, because by steering into the corner too soon, you have cut yourself off of the ideal line and are now headed straight for the outside of the corner. Your only option now is to hit the brakes and hope you don't crash.
That make absolutely no sense.Maybe if he had done less of that, his palmares would have matched his potential. No, on a serious note, sure he does, as he is, or was(?) until recently, also focused on CX and MTB.
Exactly.. WHILE they are out everyday. Not targetted technique training at the cost of endurance training. It's hard to practice cornering at race intensity in training anyway.
An important thing that is being missed in this too is that the 'best' line is frequently not the one that a racer can take due to many factors. So you can't just point at the 'best' line and say 'do that every time'.