Teams & Riders The Remco Evenepoel is the next Eddy Merckx thread

Page 375 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Hilarious.
What difference is there between pushing 400 watts for an hour in an ITT / solo break or pushing it uphill, unless they thought Stavsro was at 3k altitude or that Evenepoel was still 68kg. lol
Guy got a silver WCC medal in a 65 minute ITT at the age of 19. For a team that is so advanced in the medical department, they didn't think him struggling last year had anything to do with the lack of base due to what had happened? DO THEY NOT READ THIS TOPIC???


They have stated repeatedly he will not be going to the Tour and stick to the original plan, even if Alaphilippe doesn't make it.
I think they just watched Evenepoel climb this year, and untnil Norway he had done decidedly better on sub 10 minute climbs than 15 minutes or longer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
imagine if the roles were reversed…?

You and others would have totally taken Plapp’s side and complained that Remco was a sore loser raising his hand.

predictable.

note: if Baumann’s move yesterday was not considered illegal then this CERTAINLY was not. Lol!!
Bouwman took the normal lane though a curve and he just got there first. Schmid had to break because he took a dumb line and didn't even get to the apex first.

Evenepoel comes out of a corner into the final straight and then decides to deviate half the width of hte road because ofcourse he does.
 
I'd put him in the Tour without presure. Bar his accident he would have done the Giro in 2020 and the Tour last year, so why not get him back on schedule. It's not like doing the Tour versus doing the Vuelta would be more draining.
 
True, but he needs to get used to it. Let's see after ToS, if his form is really good then they'd be stupid not to. Plus it would do him well to experience the tts and climbs against the best.

i am of the mind that he needs to exorcise the bad experience of the Giro first. I don’t think hoping to do that at the TDF is the best idea. He needs to have a positive 3 week experience to build upon. The Vuelta provides the best possibility of that happening (and after all that’s what Pog did… ;-) ).
 
  • Like
Reactions: spalco
i am of the mind that he needs to exorcise the bad experience of the Giro first. I don’t think hoping to do that at the TDF is the best idea. He needs to have a positive 3 week experience to build upon. The Vuelta provides the best possibility of that happening (and after all that’s what Pog did… ;-) ).
That's one way of looking at it, although he went into the Giro underprepared after a horrific accident. I thus don't see why, if he is in great shape and performs with the best in Switzerland, he should have to exorcise anything going into the Tour. If he is at the right level then just let him race.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Doopie
Temperature was ideal.

I'm a bit interested in air pressure fluctuations in relation to power outputs but there's never any data on that.

Low elevation power. They started almost from the sea level. If Remco had 6.5 w/kg then Vine Jay had 6.4 w/kg for 30+ minutes - Pogacar's level.
What was Evenepoel's VAM? It must have been close to 1850 for this wattage.
 
Last edited:
Low elevation power. They started almost from the sea level. If Remco had 6.5 w/kg then Vine Jay had 6.4 w/kg for 30+ minutes - Pogacar's level.
What was Evenepoel's VAM? It must have been close to 1850 for this wattage.
Elevation plays a part yes. Low elevation unipuerto climbs are by far the best for extreme W/kg efforts, and I do think elevation is too easily ignored when very high W/kg numbers come out. And this is arguably what makes Hindleys climb insane yesterday, as he did 6.5W/kg for almost 19 minutes at like 1700m average altitude.

Even then it's still a high value. It's not like some big GT unipuerto performances are much higher. I think Yates at Alpe di Mera, Roglic at Moncalvillo, and Roglic/Valverde at Acebo, as well as Valverde in Catalunya 2017 were all in similarish ranges.

Now while the number is raelly high it's hard to extrapolate. If you ever see the W/kg vs time graphs from CyclingGraphs or Lanterne Rouge you may note that whether a number is really high or not compared to others does not really seem to correlate with wether it was the winning or best performance of that day. Some mighty performances compared to the rest of the field can often look really weak on such graphs.

If you take Almeidas example here. Sega di Ala looks like one of his weaker climbs. Yet it's the only time he was the best of a group of WT GC riders. Meanwhile on Piancavallo, his best performance in this graph, he was hard dropped. I'm sure that even for frigging Nibali Piancavallo 2020 looks like a good performance.

FThcpzJWUAEm8e2
 
Elevation plays a part yes. Low elevation unipuerto climbs are by far the best for extreme W/kg efforts, and I do think elevation is too easily ignored when very high W/kg numbers come out. And this is arguably what makes Hindleys climb insane yesterday, as he did 6.5W/kg for almost 19 minutes at like 1700m average altitude.

Even then it's still a high value. It's not like some big GT unipuerto performances are much higher. I think Yates at Alpe di Mera, Roglic at Moncalvillo, and Roglic/Valverde at Acebo, as well as Valverde in Catalunya 2017 were all in similarish ranges.

Now while the number is raelly high it's hard to extrapolate. If you ever see the W/kg vs time graphs from CyclingGraphs or Lanterne Rouge you may note that whether a number is really high or not compared to others does not really seem to correlate with wether it was the winning or best performance of that day. Some mighty performances compared to the rest of the field can often look really weak on such graphs.

If you take Almeidas example here. Sega di Ala looks like one of his weaker climbs. Yet it's the only time he was the best of a group of WT GC riders. Meanwhile on Piancavallo, his best performance in this graph, he was hard dropped. I'm sure that even for frigging Nibali Piancavallo 2020 looks like a good performance.

FThcpzJWUAEm8e2

The only explanation for it is unreliable wattage calculation. They base them on some formulas (probably varying between sources) that don't take into account real conditions (wind, road quality, fatigue factors, weather conditions etc) and obviously in most cases nobody knows real wattages from riders' powermeters. VAM is better for comparisons (at least for similar gradients) but it also doesn't take into account the unknown factors.

I'm not questioning Evenepoel's performance but how the hell did Vine Jay (weighting almost 70 kg) achieve such a phenomenal wattage? (6.4 w/kg i.e. 440 watts: for 30+ minutes!). The guy should be a multiple GT winner by now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan