Is this why Remco starts so many small stage races with low competition? Because to not win is seen as a failure?
According to the lantern rouge Remco put in the best climbing performance of the year in the tour of Norway, buy why don't we see him at the criterium de dauphine, Tirreno - no one is watching the tour of Norway during the giro
how would we see him at the dauphine during the giro...? I am confused.
how many race days has he done compared to others...? Seems like a lot. He has done two of the hardest world tour stage races and is about to do another... (?)
itzulia (the hardest one-week stage race in the season) was already a huge step up considering his weight and fitness at that time. and he was by far the rider who animated the most attacking and excitement.
he is going to the TDS and therefore cannot go to Dauphine...(?) Again, I am confused about what exactly your issue is...?
the TDS is arguably more difficult than Dauphine. and the competition (other than jumbo) appears to also be much harder.
other than pog, who exactly in your mind has been more successful in the entirety of the races they have done this year...? One could perhaps point to Vlasov for consistency. But what has he actually won...Valenciana in freaking February...!?
and btw, side-note: many, many fans preferred Norway this year over watching the most boring giro ever. lol. at least there was exciting, attacking riding.