The discussion about training in altitude is interesting. I don't know of altitude is good to every rider. Maybe some riders respond better to training in altitude than others.He has not done altitude yet, has Martinez?
Gotta unban @Jancouver to hear the unfiltered truth about Colombians.Surely we must be past the 3000m altitude, living in shed, riding a bike, Colombian advantage by now.
Almost everyone gets an increase in hematocrit from the hypoxia at altitude, then after return to lower elevation drops gradually to previous hematocrit level over the course of two weeks. This is without adding any clinic-related programs.The discussion about training in altitude is interesting. I don't know of altitude is good to every rider. Maybe some riders respond better to training in altitude than others.
Maybe the effect is not equal to everybody because riders like Remco and Pogacar will just do one altitude training camp before the Tour, and riders like roglic and Vingegaard will do 3/4 training camps. Vingegaard is at the moment in teide.Almost everyone gets an increase in hematocrit from the hypoxia at altitude, then after return to lower elevation drops gradually to previous hematocrit level over the course of two weeks. This is without adding any clinic-related programs.
Yep,Does not look good for your boy there. Even Rogla's gregario is stomping him.
Was he at his climbing weight at the start of the Giro?
He beat him quite comfortably at his GT weight at the Giro...
Funnily enough, they sent him significantly heavier to the Giro than the '22 Vuelta for that very reason. Their explanation was that he needed to be lighter in the '22 Vuelta because it had more short and steep climbs, compared to the Giro, which supposedly had longer and less steep climbs and this way he could benefit more from the TT's. Which again shows you the masterminds that are surrounding him at SQS. Taking the risk of losing multiple minutes in the mountains, to gain a few seconds in the TT. Also, why does Vingegaard weigh so little for the Tour? Because the Tour has even longer and less steep climbs generally speaking than the Giro. Why hasn't Visma caught on yet? They should put Vingegaard in the Tour weighing 68 or something, he will do even better in the flat TT and the extra weight doesn't really matter that much in the mountains.He beat him quite comfortably at his GT weight at the Giro...
There was a time Evenepoel might have thought like this, luckily he matured and grew upDoes not look good for your boy there. Even Rogla's gregario is stomping him.
I bet Rogla went full yoda mode on training camp.Does not look good for your boy there. Even Rogla's gregario is stomping him.
The cringe side of the force feeds on (wheelsucking) hate.I bet Rogla went full yoda mode on training camp.
"Feel the pedals you must"
Do you think the staff surrounding Remco is that bad?Funnily enough, they sent him significantly heavier to the Giro than the '22 Vuelta for that very reason. Their explanation was that he needed to be lighter in the '22 Vuelta because it had more short and steep climbs, compared to the Giro, which supposedly had longer and less steep climbs and this way he could benefit more from the TT's. Which again shows you the masterminds that are surrounding him at SQS. Taking the risk of losing multiple minutes in the mountains, to gain a few seconds in the TT. Also, why does Vingegaard weigh so little for the Tour? Because the Tour has even longer and less steep climbs generally speaking than the Giro. Why hasn't Visma caught on yet? They should put Vingegaard in the Tour weighing 68 or something, he will do even better in the flat TT and the extra weight doesn't really matter that much in the mountains.
Still the same Evenepoel, by the looks of it. If he doesn't perform on Malhao - let's say a win or a VERY close 2nd place, I'd say a good TdF GC result is out of the question, UNLESS his mid-February form is worse than usual.Yep,
Remco not being able to win against the B-Teams crew is worrying - even at this early season's time
Would you be kind and explain the difference?Right because a 47.8 km TT all of a sudden equals a 19.6 km TT.
Lol, what type of conclusions are you drawing out of a February raceStill the same Evenepoel, by the looks of it. If he doesn't perform on Malhao - let's say a win or a VERY close 2nd place, I'd say a good TdF GC result is out of the question, UNLESS his mid-February form is worse than usual.
It's not only about who's the better medium mountain puncheur, Dani or Remco. No, the pace was high enough to the point that a generational GC talent with an uphill sprint should have dusted the subpar competition. The run-in to the final climb was hard.
Needless to say, this type of finish is not ideal for Kuss, who came in third.
Lol, what type of conclusions are you drawing out of a February race
This isn't even a difficult climb. Claiming that if he doesn't finish first or close 2nd in the last stage it's impossible for him to reach a decent GC result in the TDF is just extremely silly.The same conclusions any sane person would. Like I said, UNLESS his mid-February (climbing) form is worse than usual, IT LOOKS like his level hasn't gone up. For now. Malhao could be different, as we only have one data point right now.
So given how he cracked from being too heavy in the Vuelta, he wouldn't have been able to contend for the title in the Giro as he was also too heavy there (in hindsight)?Funnily enough, they sent him significantly heavier to the Giro than the '22 Vuelta for that very reason. Their explanation was that he needed to be lighter in the '22 Vuelta because it had more short and steep climbs, compared to the Giro, which supposedly had longer and less steep climbs and this way he could benefit more from the TT's. Which again shows you the masterminds that are surrounding him at SQS. Taking the risk of losing multiple minutes in the mountains, to gain a few seconds in the TT. Also, why does Vingegaard weigh so little for the Tour? Because the Tour has even longer and less steep climbs generally speaking than the Giro. Why hasn't Visma caught on yet? They should put Vingegaard in the Tour weighing 68 or something, he will do even better in the flat TT and the extra weight doesn't really matter that much in the mountains.
Different type of racing, against different type of opponents. Or did you feel Roglic was as strong in the Giro as in the Vuelta?So given how he cracked from being too heavy in the Vuelta, he wouldn't have been able to contend for the title in the Giro as he was also too heavy there (in hindsight)?
His 2022 climbing form was awful in the early season, then he won the Vuelta by virtue of beeing the best climber.The same conclusions any sane person would. Like I said, UNLESS his mid-February (climbing) form is worse than usual, IT LOOKS like his level hasn't gone up. For now. Malhao could be different. We only have one data point right now.
One could also argue that yesterday was his best Foia climb.The same conclusions any sane person would. Like I said, UNLESS his mid-February (climbing) form is worse than usual, IT LOOKS like his level hasn't gone up. For now. Malhao could be different. We only have one data point right now.
I guess it would depend if he was equally "overweight" in the Giro, wouldn't it?So given how he cracked from being too heavy in the Vuelta, he wouldn't have been able to contend for the title in the Giro as he was also too heavy there (in hindsight)?
I believe he cracked in the Vuelta because they got his nutrition wrong, trying to loose weight too fast or during the Vuelta. All signs point to that imho. They sent him to the Giro with a weight they considered ideal for that race, so they didn't need to start messing around with his diet. So he would not have experienced in the Giro, the bonk he experienced in the Vuelta.So given how he cracked from being too heavy in the Vuelta, he wouldn't have been able to contend for the title in the Giro as he was also too heavy there (in hindsight)?