- Feb 20, 2012
- 54,086
- 44,454
- 28,180
Brainfart, I meant the MTFs specificallyRemco literally was 10 minutes ahead of Almeida and 3 minutes behind Vingo. Not sure how you get he was closer to Almeida
Brainfart, I meant the MTFs specificallyRemco literally was 10 minutes ahead of Almeida and 3 minutes behind Vingo. Not sure how you get he was closer to Almeida
Brainfart, I meant the MTFs specifically
Sure I said that.So you also think LeMond would be a level above if he was born a decade later?
Unless he doesn't count as a big talent or your "always" didn't mean always, then you sure did.Sure I said that.
Is Pogacar always going to be so lucky that Evenepoel crashes in April and has a bad preparation for the TDF? Or are we just ignoring that piece of context on why he lost that much time on a MTF?
there are about 20 different ways to phrase your question that aren’t putting words in my mouth.Unless he doesn't count as a big talent or your "always" didn't mean always, then you sure did.
I'll offer a more open question then. Was there any of the "big talents" who "dominated" in the 90's who wouldn't be "a level above" a decade earlier?there are about 20 different ways to phrase your question that aren’t putting words in my mouth.
Of course Lemond would have dominated. If he was using the same “training” as everyone else.
I hope there won’t be a list of riders you’ll ask me to explain.
According to Bruyneel, Evenepoel and Foré aren't getting along very well.They say this every year
Doesn’t surprise me. I think Foré with his background doesn’t accept the decisions Evenepoel is able to make in the team. But don’t go to Ineos, go to Bora.According to Bruyneel, Evenepoel and Foré aren't getting along very well.
Wait...we're talking about the guy hit by a mail truck?He lost to riders like Gee, Vlasov, and De Plus... If that isn't a sign his prep was ***, I don't know what is.
We were talking about last year (2024). That his preparation for TDF was ***, which showed in 2 ways:Wait...we're talking about the guy hit by a mail truck?
You can't know the effacy of your very intense race program until...when, genius? Until you race. He definitely performed until the gauge was on empty and, hopefully learned from it.
Shame he isn't a US rider. No one pays attention to you until you've won a Tour.
Dauphine shape does not equate to TdF shape.We were talking about last year (2024). That his preparation for TDF was ***, which showed in 2 ways:
1. His performance in Dauphine where he was beaten by riders he should easily beat
2. His performance in 3rd week of the TDF, which showed his base was lower and he wasn't able to perform as well as in the first two weeks of the TDF. You saw the same with Vingegaard. The amount of effort accumulated over all those days was too much for them, which resulted in weaker performances later in the Tour. Because their prep wasn't as it should be, too rushed.
Dauphine shape was an indicator that his preparation was rushed.Dauphine shape does not equate to TdF shape.
And you cannot confidently claim Evenepoel was worse in the Alps than in the Pyrenees.
I think every performance at the Tour suggests he was at his best level ever by far, and he was super consistent throughout the Tour as well.Dauphine shape was an indicator that his preparation was rushed.
Is your narrative that Evenepoel was perfectly prepared for TDF last year? And that there isn't any margin to gain if he wouldn't have crashed in april?
I don't find it strange, he's still young and improving by growing older and becoming stronger. So he can have a bad preparation and still have a better performance. Look at Vingegaard... He also rode his best numbers and had a bad preparation. We also expect him to be much better this year with optimal preparation.I think every performance at the Tour suggests he was at his best level ever by far, and he was super consistent throughout the Tour as well.
I just think it's strange to blame subpar preperation when someone performance at a career highest level and when the guys that were better have always shown a higher floor and ceiling.
But this is just the recurring narrative. He didn't become the new dominant GT force, and so we're retrospectively looking for reasons why, when even in his early days he wasn't the natural climber that would be necessary to achieve the level he was projected at. FFS we're still talking about a crash from 5 years ago half the time.
Bernal claimed to push higher numbers in the Tour after he had suffered a lot from his back problems during the year, the TDF he got dropped from a peloton led by Van Aert.I just think it's strange to blame subpar preperation when someone performance at a career highest level and when the guys that were better have always shown a higher floor and ceiling.
Bernal claimed to push higher numbers in the Tour after he had suffered a lot from his back problems during the year, the TDF he got dropped from a peloton led by Van Aert.
Vingegaard claimed he pushed his best numbers last year after also being involved in that crash in Itzulia, with even less prep.
The last ITT was a bit of a red flag though. He lost time between every timestop except the last one. While in the first ITT he only lost time during the downhill section.I do think Rick meant not just absolute numbers (which vary due to other things we cant mention) but his relative performance vs the rest of the competition which was dominant and quite consistent. I think he can get better but there was never a stage when I thought: "he lost minutes here due to shallow base"
He lost the most time in the downhill also in the 2nd TT. So him not doing extensive recons this year either seems like a genius decision.The last ITT was a bit of a red flag though. He lost time between every timestop except the last one. While in the first ITT he only lost time during the downhill section.
Then what is even the point of his argument? IIRC he has made similar claims before regarding this topic. It sure looks like he is saying that Evenepoel would not have been performing better had he had a better preperation (without crashing, without rehab, without sudden weight increase (due to not training) and crash course weight drop between Dauphiné and TDF, while simply continuing the planned training/preparation). If he means Evenepoel might not have been able to get a better result (2nd or 1st) then i don't think anybody has made that claim, other than "we don't know how much better he might have been".I do think Rick meant not just absolute numbers (which vary due to other things we cant mention) but his relative performance vs the rest of the competition which was dominant and quite consistent. I think he can get better but there was never a stage when I thought: "he lost minutes here due to shallow base"
Well there's 0 surprise there considering the final split was the only flat section and the others where all either uphill, downhill or both.The last ITT was a bit of a red flag though. He lost time between every timestop except the last one. While in the first ITT he only lost time during the downhill section.
And this year appears to be a repeat of rushing to race before form is deep enough.We were talking about last year (2024). That his preparation for TDF was ***, which showed in 2 ways:
1. His performance in Dauphine where he was beaten by riders he should easily beat
2. His performance in 3rd week of the TDF, which showed his base was lower and he wasn't able to perform as well as in the first two weeks of the TDF. You saw the same with Vingegaard. The amount of effort accumulated over all those days was too much for them, which resulted in weaker performances later in the Tour. Because their prep wasn't as it should be, too rushed.
