Taxus4a said:I think anyway Menchov doped sometimes, but he is a good cyclist
Can you get a TUE on the basis of being good? If so, it should be revoked when you crash uphill.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Taxus4a said:I think anyway Menchov doped sometimes, but he is a good cyclist
sniper said:good reminder.
look how well the biopassport worked in 09.
people adapt.
sniper said:rasmussen in Dutch newspaper says asking cyclists to adhere to antidoping rules while Pat was in charge was a bit like asking Italians to pay taxes while Berlusconi was president.
one is constantly left wondering how the acclaimed culture change in cycling could ever have come about under Pat's watch...
You forget the true contender of that Giro. The one and only Di Luca beaten by only 41 sec by Menchov who in typical style hit the deck in the decisive ITT. I think pellizotti was also stripped of his place. But I confess, I kind of liked Menchov while Di Luca was on a high-octane programme as Lance says.Dazed and Confused said:sure, but why not rip a couple of jerseys off his back. Giro 2009 (clean era, lol) result:
1. RUS MENCHOV Denis RAB 86h03'11" 500
2. ITA PELLIZOTTI Franco LIQ 01'59" 375
3. ESP SASTRE CANDIL Carlos CTT 03'46" 315
4. ITA BASSO Ivan LIQ 03'59" 270
5. USA LEIPHEIMER Levi AST 05'28" 245
6. ITA GARZELLI Stefano ASA 08'43" 220
7. AUS ROGERS Michael THR 10'01" 195
8. SLO VALJAVEC Tadej ALM 11'13" 170
9. ITA BRUSEGHIN Marzio LAM 11'28" 155
10. ESP ARROYO DURAN David GCE 12'50" 140
Menchov whacked a pretty serious group of dopers here.
Rollthedice said:You forget the true contender of that Giro. The one and only Di Luca beaten by only 41 sec by Menchov who in typical style hit the deck in the decisive ITT. I think pellizotti was also stripped of his place. But I confess, I kind of liked Menchov while Di Luca was on a high-octane programme as Lance says.
Benotti69 said:Kohl said that the BP helped him sort his program. Maybe that was the idea behind BP.
Von Mises said:Yes, thats what they always say that tests are joke, easy to beat, you have to be very stupid to get caught...and then...they are busted.
I dunno, some of his crashes were pretty cool. Takes a special type to hit the tarmac while climbingDazed and Confused said:As a serious doper Menchov was incredible dull.
zlev11 said:an underrated Menchov crash was when he fell going over a zebra crossing in (i think) the 2009 Tour. the silent killer, indeed.
Yep, good thing those 2008 Giro tests have been retested.neineinei said:He was busted for CERA, something he didn't know they could test for. To get caught in a new test is always a risk, and probably he was stupid for not understanding there might be a test for CERA by July 2008, and he certainly was stupid for not taking into account that it wasn't UCI which sanctioned the 2008 TdF, it was the French. But the introduction of new tests doesn't happen often. It hasn't been since 2008 that so many were caught for something "new", and Pat made sure UCI sanctioned the races after that bad mishap.
What does Rasmussen know about it? He's been a pariah in cycling for years. Oh, and he also says he believes cycling has become cleaner, which seems to contradict the quotation you posted. Then again, everything he ever says contradicts something he's said before.sniper said:rasmussen in Dutch newspaper says asking cyclists to adhere to antidoping rules while Pat was in charge was a bit like asking Italians to pay taxes while Berlusconi was president.
one is constantly left wondering how the acclaimed culture change in cycling could ever have come about under Pat's watch...
And yet he kicked Froome's ar@e left right and centre in the 2011 Brixia Tour, well...theyoungest said:What does Rasmussen know about it? He's been a pariah in cycling for years. Oh, and he also says he believes cycling has become cleaner, which seems to contradict the quotation you posted. Then again, everything he ever says contradicts something he's said before.
So did the whole peloton. Great point.Fearless Greg Lemond said:And yet he kicked Froome's ar@e left right and centre in the 2011 Brixia Tour, well...
+1del1962 said:You need to seperate Ras's facts from his opinions,
His facts will be solid, who he doped with etc
His opinions are just that opinions, some of his will be more solid than others of his, depending on how much info he has.
And then there is the grey area like all Rabo at 2007 tour doped, opinion or fact?
sniper said:+1
i agree with this.
Dear Wiggo said:
How do you categorise "100% of Rabobank were on a doping program?"
Fact, or opinion?
I don't think it's anywhere near as simple as that.
sniper said:i think that's fact (and do not agree on this very issue with del1962)
what i meant is: when rasmussen says something that I believe is true, for me that's fact.
when he says something I don't believe is true, for me that's opinion.
same with Tyler. I don't doubt his words on who doped.
I doubt him when he says sky are clean.
How are we to know if his facts are solid?del1962 said:You need to seperate Ras's facts from his opinions,
His facts will be solid, who he doped with etc
His opinions are just that opinions, some of his will be more solid than others of his, depending on how much info he has.
And then there is the grey area like all Rabo at 2007 tour doped, opinion or fact?
RownhamHill said:Fixed that for you.
theyoungest said:We get the impression that there are two sources for the blood brothers story, when in fact there's one, and it's Rasmussen himself. Very smartly done, and seemingly part of an elaborate slander campaign to win a few million euros in court.
DirtyWorks said:Except he lost that case.
There's no doubt Rasmussen is a smart guy. But, this kind of narrow, difficult effort to discredit him doesn't fit with a bigger narrative that the guy has gone on a confessional spree much more detailed and regretful than say Landis and Hamilton.
Not really. But I agree with the rest of your post.DirtyWorks said:Except he lost that case.
There's no doubt Rasmussen is a smart guy. But, this kind of narrow, difficult effort to discredit him doesn't fit with a bigger narrative that the guy has gone on a confessional spree much more detailed and regretful than say Landis and Hamilton.