The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
skidmark said:Armstrong also said in 2007-08 that Stijn Devolder would be a grand tour contender.
craig1985 said:He also rubbished Cunego. I suppose on the law of averages you are bound to get one or two right.
I reckon Devolder could be a GT contendor with Bruyneel. Just like Rogers.issoisso said:And before that, he had said Cunego was the future of cycling.
It's Armstrong. What did you expect?
How do you know that some of these people aren't already on a program that's just as good as Bruyneels, and that this isn't just how good they are? Besides on that list Menchov, Vino and Basso already have won GTs, and Andy Schleck certainly would be the favourite for any GT that didn't have Contador in it.blackcat said:I reckon Devolder could be a GT contendor with Bruyneel. Just like Rogers.
How many riders could win a GT with Bruyneel and Ferrari?
Augustyn, Froome, Wiggins, Thomas, Gesink, Menchov, Nibali, Kreuziger, Andy Schleck, Evans, Basso, Cancellara, Fuglsang, Rogers, Lovqvist, Martin, Leipheimer, Vino, Kashechkin, Moncoutie, Devolder, Martin, Vande Velde,
You just need to check the Tour de France team timetrials over the past decade, to discern the best team medical programs. I call this, "The team timetrial medical program maxim".Cerberus said:How do you know that some of these people aren't already on a program that's just as good as Bruyneels, and that this isn't just how good they are? Besides on that list Menchov, Vino and Basso already have won GTs, and Andy Schleck certainly would be the favourite for any GT that didn't have Contador in it.
we are assuming Moncoutie rectifies his neuroses.craig1985 said:Even with a good program I doubt Moncoutie (and I think he is clean/er) could win a GT. He is either off the front or at the back of the peloton because he is scared of riding in the middle, rubbish at going downhill (in fact in his early years he had to stop to put a jacket on before he went downhill) and the less about his TT the better.
Gilbert said so himself several years ago, that even with all the dope in the world he would never win a GT.
blackcat said:You just need to check the Tour de France team timetrials over the past decade, to discern the best team medical programs. I call this, "The team timetrial medical program maxim".
One exception, a Credit Agricole team circa 2001, with Moreau, Hushovd, O'Grady, Julich, Voigt, Vaughters, plus an inconspicuous NZ rider, and forgetting the two others at the moment. Jens ofcourse, did not have to bury his perfluorocarbons in the Tour.
Well that doesn't really demonstrate whether the program is better, it could just be applied to more riders, and it doesn't show the difference between hiring strong riders and using lots of doping.blackcat said:You just need to check the Tour de France team timetrials over the past decade, to discern the best team medical programs. I call this, "The team timetrial medical program maxim".
I'm not sure I follow you there. Are you saying that they weren't doped, or at least particularly doped even though they won or what? And what's that about perfluorocarbons?blackcat said:One exception, a Credit Agricole team circa 2001, with Moreau, Hushovd, O'Grady, Julich, Voigt, Vaughters, plus an inconspicuous NZ rider, and forgetting the two others at the moment. Jens ofcourse, did not have to bury his perfluorocarbons in the Tour.
what part of the term "exception" do you not understand?craig1985 said:If CA were on the program in 2001 when they won the TTT, why didn't they give Vaughters the cortisone to heal his wasp sting? I mean other riders (and his words, a top rider) were riding alongside him and mocking him for being on the wrong team because on their team they would of said he had a knee injury (when he didn't) to take cortisone.
That NZ bloke (Chris Jenner) also rode under a French licence at the time.
1998 Tour, with Gan.craig1985 said:Something about hiding dope under the ground's surface IIRC. I think that is in reference to the 2003 Tour.
Cerberus said:Well that doesn't really demonstrate whether the program is better, it could just be applied to more riders, and it doesn't show the difference between hiring strong riders and using lots of doping.
Still I think you have a point about TTs. it would be interesting to track whether TT performances systematically went up, when riders signed up with certain teams. Of cause that could just be because some DS were very motivational or good at using wind tunnels. It doesn't have to be because of Doping..... (Ok. I'll be serious now).
I'm not sure I follow you there. Are you saying that they weren't doped, or at least particularly doped even though they won or what? And what's that about perfluorocarbons?
blackcat said:what part of the term "exception" do you not understand?![]()
blackcat said:Voigt overrated. Wish someone would put him in his box.
Jamsque said:How can you possibly be hating on Jens Voigt? Are you crazy or something? And I don't see how you can call the guy over-rated, pretty much all of his wins have been surprises, he is basically never a favourite (except for the Criterium International)