The Sidebar Thread

Page 7 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
martinvickers said:
If You think the clinic is about doping, you're more of a fool than I thought.

But I'm not surprised it seems straightforward to you - to a hammer, every problem looks like a nail...

Balls, not man.

You are on record for saying you come to the clinic to get entertained. That is duly noted and archived in my records.

Now, you can deny all you want. But it does not look good for your credibility. If the clinic isnt about doping then what is it about? What exactly is it that gives you entertainment?
 

martinvickers

BANNED
Oct 15, 2012
4,903
0
0
thehog said:
Nah it's not. Martin and I are good. It's just a little mental prodding. Please don't see it as anything else.

:)

Thank you, Hog, that's decent of you. And of course, it's not remotely a threat.

(For goodness sake, what am I going to do over the interwebs even if i was so inclined?)
 

martinvickers

BANNED
Oct 15, 2012
4,903
0
0
the sceptic said:
Balls, not man.

You are on record for saying you come to the clinic to get entertained. That is duly noted and archived in my records.

Now, you can deny all you want. But it does not look good for your credibility. If the clinic isnt about doping then what is it about? What exactly is it that gives you entertainment?

I already told you.

You. You and your ilk amuse me.

You should really check your archived records, it's all there, septic.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
martinvickers said:
I already told you.

You. You and your ilk amuse me.

You should really check your archived records, it's all there, septic.

Another insult. Duly noted.

What does that mean Martin? You get amused by people discussing doping? Again, not good for your credibility.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
martinvickers said:
Trying to bait me into a ban like septic, by any chance? Tut tut.

Thats a dumb response. I'm responding to your posts, nothing else.

You post in the clinic, like thousands of people do, hundreds on a regular basis.
The difference is you continually declare yourself to be above the clinic. You patronizingly announce to people that they amuse you, and you patronizingly insult people then tell them "its the truth, if you don't like it tough tities", you use patronizing language in half your posts.

I'm sorry, if you believe yourself to be above the forum, but continue to post here, don't be surprised when people take you up on that.

No one else here thinks you are better than them.
I'm not trying to bait anyone. I'm responding to someone who's ego needs to be taken down a notch.
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
martinvickers said:
Thank you, Hog, that's decent of you. And of course, it's not remotely a threat.

(For goodness sake, what am I going to do over the interwebs even if i was so inclined?)

That's ok. Even though we rarely agree I believe the Clinic would be a lesser place without you in it.

I'd hate this forum to be a environment whereby one person posts and the next 11 agree.
 

martinvickers

BANNED
Oct 15, 2012
4,903
0
0
the sceptic said:
Another insult. Duly noted.

What does that mean Martin? You get amused by people discussing doping? Again, not good for your credibility.

Where's the insult?

I get amused at a certain type of poster "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing". Masquerading at high moral purpose, but seeking only bile and b!tching.

These sorts amuse me. As do you, oddly enough.

Now as to your view on my 'credibility'. Yep, that's also amusing.
 

martinvickers

BANNED
Oct 15, 2012
4,903
0
0
thehog said:
That's ok. Even though we rarely agree I believe the Clinic would be a lesser place without you in it.

I'd hate this forum to be a environment whereby one person posts and the next 11 agree.

thanks. I fear some of our colleagues don't agree, but sure, that's life, i can't deny it....
 

martinvickers

BANNED
Oct 15, 2012
4,903
0
0
The Hitch said:
Thats a dumb response. I'm responding to your posts, nothing else.

You post in the clinic, like thousands of people do, hundreds on a regular basis.
The difference is you continually declare yourself to be above the clinic. You patronizingly announce to people that they amuse you, and you patronizingly insult people then tell them "its the truth, if you don't like it tough tities", you use patronizing language in half your posts.

I'm sorry, if you believe yourself to be above the forum, but continue to post here, don't be surprised when people take you up on that.

No one else here thinks you are better than them.
I'm not trying to bait anyone. I'm responding to someone who's ego needs to be taken down a notch.

Oh, get you! Oh, this is good stuff. No doubt you think yourself the chap for the job too. Good luck to ye.

No doubt the mods and the bans will be coming soon, and we can all pretend it's a victory in the fight against evil. Huzzah!

p.s. it's 'titty'. Tough titty. Python quote.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
martinvickers said:
Oh, get you! Oh, this is good stuff. No doubt you think yourself the chap for the job too. Good luck to ye.

Could you translate that into English for me?
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
martinvickers said:
Where's the insult?

I get amused at a certain type of poster "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing". Masquerading at high moral purpose, but seeking only bile and b!tching.

These sorts amuse me. As do you, oddly enough.

Now as to your view on my 'credibility'. Yep, that's also amusing.

Martin. If you were serious about anti doping, you wouldnt spend all your time trolling, clogging up threads, being entertained by doping, and in general being a pompous ******bag, making every thread you post in unreadable.

But I will give you some credit, you have trolled continously for thousands of posts under the radar. most trolls get nuked long before that.
 

martinvickers

BANNED
Oct 15, 2012
4,903
0
0

Martin. If you were serious about anti doping, you wouldnt spend all your time trolling, clogging up threads, being entertained by doping, and in general being a pompous ******bag, making every thread you post in unreadable.

But I will give you some credit, you have trolled continously for thousands of posts under the radar. most trolls get nuked long before that.

Now, boys and girls what do we call this again?

That's right, Johnny...

Displacement.

You are an publically confessed baiter and troll, septic. Please don't waste either of our times expecting to taken seriously. Stick to what you're good for. Comic relief.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
martinvickers said:
Now, boys and girls what do we call this again?

That's right, Johnny...

Displacement.

You are an publically confessed baiter and troll, septic. Please don't waste either of our times expecting to taken seriously. Stick to what you're good for. Comic relief.

Cool story dr Phil, but youre missing the point.

I dont care if you take me seriously or not. And Im also not interested in winning discussions with you.

All I want is for you to get banned, so I dont have to wade through your moronic posts anymore.
 

martinvickers

BANNED
Oct 15, 2012
4,903
0
0
the sceptic said:
Cool story dr Phil, but youre missing the point.

I dont care if you take me seriously or not. And Im also not interested in winning discussions with you.

All I want is for you to get banned, so I dont have to wade through your moronic posts anymore.

If you don't like my posts, there's a simple ignore button, septic.

But we both know why you are trying to troll me into a ban.

Still, cheer up.
 
Aug 16, 2011
10,819
2
0
If you two are going to continue here then I'll allow it, but do so in a civil matter (if that's at all possible) and stop the insults.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
martinvickers said:
If you don't like my posts, there's a simple ignore button, septic.

But we both know why you are trying to troll me into a ban.

Still, cheer up.

how many insults is that for one day martin? im starting to lose count now.
 
Jul 5, 2012
2,878
1
11,485
Further to Afranks unambiguous warning, purposely misusing handles is not acceptable under any circumstances.

Cheers
Bison
 
May 10, 2009
4,640
10
15,495
martinvickers said:
For instance?

Your claim that Moore and Kimmage thing sparked off because of Kimmage, according to Moore, seeking a position with Sky...that BS
 
May 10, 2009
4,640
10
15,495
martinvickers said:
Where's the insult?

I get amused at a certain type of poster "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing". Masquerading at high moral purpose, but seeking only bile and b!tching.

These sorts amuse me. As do you, oddly enough.

Now as to your view on my 'credibility'. Yep, that's also amusing.

This post is ironic considering you rarely go a post without insulting someone...yesterday you spoke of my known anger issues...have we met? Do you know anyone who has met me?
No.
 

martinvickers

BANNED
Oct 15, 2012
4,903
0
0
Digger said:
This post is ironic considering you rarely go a post without insulting someone...yesterday you spoke of my known anger issues...have we met? Do you know anyone who has met me?
No.

Don't be so sure - It's a small island.