cromagnon said:What?! Ashenden says when new tests are developed they try them on already tested samples, perfect way to test two testing protocols. jeez elementary science there.
Yes, but that doesnt mean they test them on every sample does it?
cromagnon said:What?! Ashenden says when new tests are developed they try them on already tested samples, perfect way to test two testing protocols. jeez elementary science there.
Dekker_Tifosi said:No not all. What's wrong with suspecting Evans? He has been known to work with Ferrari in the past. Maybe you don't like that I suspect your little hero?
Frosty said:Yes, but that doesnt mean they test them on every sample does it?![]()
ak-zaaf said:Evans and Sastre are 2 riders who most people believe are clean.
Frosty said:Ive heard before that it is due to the labs being busy with various other tests. Not sure how true this is but it sounds plausible
workingclasshero said:sastre: yes (can people please stop thinking the mr. clean tag means he's got a rep among pros as a non-doper?)
menchov: yes (not a shadow of a doubt)
evans:yes (i hope not, my favourite rider he is, he makes me laugh from time to time cadel)
vdv: yes
kirchen: yes
astarloza: yes
schumacher: yes (although it would be funny if he wasn't)
fschleck: yes (fuentes ...)
ashleck: yes (fuentes client's brother)
nibali: yes
well that's what i think is/was the reality of the 2008 tour
don't think any of them will be busted though. well except schumacher![]()
![]()
So you can't stand that somebody is going against the stream of what others think.Thoughtforfood said:I can't stand Evans. My point is that on this thread, you seem to keep throwing barbs at people, and it is a bit annoying.
Bala Verde said:Menchov, Ten Dam, Evans had been asked before the 2009 start that their 2008 samples would be retested, correct?
BroDeal said:It does not sound that plausible to me unless the amount of testing varies a lot between cycling's season and off season. The volume of work would have to vary enough that it does not make sense to hire more people.
Frosty said:Maybe, but then some people have been busted this year for tests that were taken quite a while, in some cases months, beforehand. Then again it is three months since the tests were announced at the start of the tour.Be interesting to see what results come back.
so what's that something other in your opinion?BroDeal said:It is interesting that now that there is a large volume of testing, the results are delayed by months. A few years back when there was much less testing, the results were also delayed by months. And a few years before that when there was still less testing the delays were months. There has to be something other than problems with workload at the labs.
You read my mind. Add Menchov. Valverde, I am not even sure if he will be catched this time. He was very cautious during the Tour in 97 and 98.Digger said:Kirchen
Fabian
Jens
Sastre
George
Frank and Andy
python said:so what's that something other in your opinion?
Dekker_Tifosi said:No not all. What's wrong with suspecting Evans? He has been known to work with Ferrari in the past. Maybe you don't like that I suspect your little hero?
issoisso said:According to austrian newspaper Kurier's interview with Bordry:
- 40 riders in the 2008 Tour have blood values indicative of possible manipulation
- 15 of those were chosen for re-testing with the new EPO test as they are considered likely to be flagged positive
- the results are expected to be available within two weeks maximum
Dekker_Tifosi said:So you can't stand that somebody is going against the stream of what others think.
Good for you. Newsflash, not everybody thinks the same. Neither would that be healthy.
We would not even need a discussion forum when we all agree. So unless you have something on topic to report, please refrain from such useless comments in the future
Kthxbai!
Thoughtforfood said:I can't stand Evans. My point is that on this thread, you seem to keep throwing barbs at people, and it is a bit annoying.
