At least they were probably being honest, rather than trying to turn a speedbump into a HC climb...
LOL.Tarnum said:![]()
The Paris-Nice TT.
Yeah, but on the other side that profile have quite same scale on axis X as on axis Y so it looks like on real roadEscarabajo said:LOL.Tarnum said:![]()
The Paris-Nice TT.![]()
I thought it was almost completely flat until I saw the details of the OP.
Well yeah, but we cannot compare length to altitude. 14.5 km in length is nothing compare to that in altitude!bassano said:Yeah, but on the other side that profile have quite same scale on axis X as on axis Y so it looks like on real roadEscarabajo said:LOL.Tarnum said:![]()
The Paris-Nice TT.![]()
I thought it was almost completely flat until I saw the details of the OP.![]()
Here it is:tobydawq said:Tour of Croatia, stage 2, profile of last 3 kilometres. What the hell?
With two kilometres to go there is a little kicker, where the riders apparently ascend 120 metres and descend it again within 100 metres...
Inexplicable... (and I still don't know how to insert pictures)
http://www.tourofcroatia.com/en/stages/stage-2-trogir-biokovo-sveti-jure/8
Just 58 riders finished together.mikii4567 said:This year's Tour de Romandie stage 1
![]()
That final climb looks like a fine competitor to Zoncolan or Angliru, until you realise that it's actually 11.5km at 5.4%.
im pay pal anyone 100 bucks who gets to that spike and pictures it in this forum !42x16ss said:Here it is:tobydawq said:Tour of Croatia, stage 2, profile of last 3 kilometres. What the hell?
With two kilometres to go there is a little kicker, where the riders apparently ascend 120 metres and descend it again within 100 metres...
Inexplicable... (and I still don't know how to insert pictures)
http://www.tourofcroatia.com/en/stages/stage-2-trogir-biokovo-sveti-jure/8
![]()
11x50 gears...Scarponi said:im pay pal anyone 100 bucks who gets to that spike and pictures it in this forum !42x16ss said:Here it is:tobydawq said:Tour of Croatia, stage 2, profile of last 3 kilometres. What the hell?
With two kilometres to go there is a little kicker, where the riders apparently ascend 120 metres and descend it again within 100 metres...
Inexplicable... (and I still don't know how to insert pictures)
http://www.tourofcroatia.com/en/stages/stage-2-trogir-biokovo-sveti-jure/8
![]()
Look at the km markers.Ricco' said:Well, that is acceptable, at least compared to the one of the second stage, where it looks like it is a killer queen stage but instead is a sprint stage.
It looks like they're climbing Alpe d'Huez 18 times. :Neutral:therealthing said:![]()
High mountain stage with some 90% inclines today in...
Dunkirk.
I know it has the height of the climbs to the left but it's still misleading.
It happens because Microsoft Excel will do it by default.Gigs_98 said:You know, the fascinating thing about these profiles is that at some point there was someone who thought "making the profiles like this is a good idea". There must have been someone who thought "labeling the x axis completely randomly is better than labeling it conventionally".
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Worst seasons one can think of | Professional Road Racing | 37 |
Similar threads |
---|
Worst seasons one can think of |