cineteq said:tweet update: the first two groups come together, but without Wiggins
That's right.
Wiggins and Greipel are in the group that is 2'39 behind. That group consists of about 30 odd riders. Game over for them.
cineteq said:tweet update: the first two groups come together, but without Wiggins
cineteq said:tweet update: the first two groups come together, but without Wiggins
Jamsque said:And to think you all laughed when I said Grabsch had a shot here!
A pan flat time trial along the coast (i.e. very windy?) Of course that suits Grabsch.Sasquatch said:If he does win, I will be the first to apologise. But he won't. That time trial doesn't suit him.
theyoungest said:A pan flat time trial along the coast (i.e. very windy?) Of course that suits Grabsch.
I don't see Grabsch winning. His ITT's have been sub-par compared to 2/3 years ago.Jamsque said:And to think you all laughed when I said Grabsch had a shot here!
Jamsque said:The three in front have 1 minute on the Westra group.
Van Keirsbulck, Engoulvent & Van Groen krijgenTeoSheva said:who are the three?
It's a typical time trial for the specialists of the big gear. And at 15 k it's not terribly short. Just look up the results of the past years, it's the Grabsch types that do well here.Sasquatch said:Too short for him.
Jamsque said:The three in front have 1 minute on the Westra group.
Engoulvent is good in prologues and short ITTs.cineteq said:Van Keirsbulck, Engoulvent & Van Groen krijgen
Winterfold said:Eurosport just woken up to Wiggo being caught at the back with Greipel, and that group has clearly given up.
How have Sky and Omega fecked that up?
TeamSkyFans said:Just tuned in
So whats the situation? G1, G2 @42, Peloton? is that G2, or further back, wiggins group? And the 7 minute group? Summup be appreciated because the thread doesnt make anything terribly clear.
killswitch said:Engoulvent is good in prologues and short ITTs.
rghysens said:no raceradio's
3 leadersTeamSkyFans said:Just tuned in
So whats the situation? G1, G2 @42, Peloton? is that G2, or further back, wiggins group? And the 7 minute group? Summup be appreciated because the thread doesnt make anything terribly clear.
There is of course the possiblity that Wiggins simply wasn't good enough.Jamsque said:Lack of radios is no excuse, this course is not selective enough that Wiggo and Greipel should have ended up so far back. They done goofed.
Jamsque said:Lack of radios is no excuse, this course is not selective enough that Wiggo and Greipel should have ended up so far back. They done goofed.
