Relatively easy course? In what sense? This Tour has the most mountainous first week since probably forever, and also ranks all time high in overall altitude meters.the relatively easy course could play into his hands, but yeah, generally I agree. He'd probably be better off not even trying.
With all due respect, but what exactly does he/Ineos expect to be able to happen in GC? So far he's shown diddly squat as a GC rider, and now suddenly in the biggest GC race of all he wants to see what will happen?
you've answered your own question. He wants to see what will happen. He's mentioned before he needs to understand what he is capable of by doing it.With all due respect, but what exactly does he/Ineos expect to be able to happen in GC? So far he's shown diddly squat as a GC rider, and now suddenly in the biggest GC race of all he wants to see what will happen?
short days, and mainly mid-mountain stages.Relatively easy course? In what sense? This Tour has the most mountainous first week since probably forever, and also ranks all time high in overall altitude meters.
you've answered your own question. He wants to see what will happen. He's mentioned before he needs to understand what he is capable of by doing it.
btw after the tour he is riding mtb worlds, but he should have a good base for it considering no illness so far this season and will do the andorra world cup after, considering he lives there.
Sosa can climb, Kuss can climb... It would make sense for him to try and "see what can happen for GC" in a smaller race, so i don't really understand why they would now take the TDF as testcase when they never bothered with going for GC in smaller races for him before.Pidders can climb, Pidders can descend probably as well as anyone in the world, but Pidders has not shown anything in the time trial.
He has experience now, but how good will he be for the entire three weeks?
If Bernal falters and Pidders is going well, he may get the support to make a go of it.
With all due respect, but what exactly does he/Ineos expect to be able to happen in GC? So far he's shown diddly squat as a GC rider, and now suddenly in the biggest GC race of all he wants to see what will happen?
To win, apparently.Tom Pidcock is feeling confident ahead of the Tour de France and is targeting stage wins and winning the general classification.
You mean a guy from the break who has to do the majority of the climb alone and eat wind for tens of kilometers is slower than fresher riders benefiting from draft? Groundbreaking stuff.Pidcock is incredibly exciting as an all-a rounder, an Alaphilippe / classics Nibali / Mohoric type who can shock and awe you with daring raids and descents, plus MTB, plus cyclocross, but I don’t really understand this.
Alpe was great but he was minutes slower than Pogi/Vingo IIRC. He’s never shown to be on par with the top, gosh, even 20 climbers or time trialists. IMHO Wout has shown more as a GC rider than Pidcock. It could happen, but it’s crowded at the top and he has shown nothing to indicate he is going to hang with the top dogs. But he can be a massive star in the sport without sacrificing everything for the Tour.
He didn't say that specifically. In fact I've no idea why Eurosport.com have said that. I would say it got lost in translation but he's English![]()
Tour de France: Tom Pidcock targets stage wins and GC success ahead of Bilbao Grand Depart - 'I want to achieve both' - Eurosport
Tom Pidcock is feeling confident ahead of the Tour de France and is targeting stage wins and winning the general classification.www.eurosport.com
To win, apparently.
Personally I think this is absurd, buy hey, ineos don't really have any options in the tour's GC.
Pello might follow, not sure i can see Landa launching it on a descent thoughI always felt his heart isn't really in road racing, as much as I'd like to see what he can do if he was to prepare specifically for a big GC, it seems like his true passion is MTB, which is fine.
He isn't really an Ineos rider either, you can tell he just wants to go on the attack and isn't interested in chugging along in a mountain train, 'we keep saying we are going to take the fight to Jumbo and UAE and just haven't'. I will say however, he is getting an absolutely cracking deal, getting paid big money and still gets to do all the offroad stuff he enjoys so fair play really.
Has a real chance on the first stage, if he can get over the top near the front I doubt many GC riders will want to risk their tour trying to follow on a Basque descent (Pello/Landa perhaps will), if he tries it will all depend on how long it takes the group to respond. Could also wait for the sprint.
You’re welcome to point out where exactly he has done something that indicated he could win the Tour.You mean a guy from the break who has to do the majority of the climb alone and eat wind for tens of kilometers is slower than fresher riders benefiting from draft? Groundbreaking stuff.
Well there was that time when ... erm ...You’re welcome to point out where exactly he has done something that indicated he could win the Tour.
I never said he could or would. I'm just pointing out that his antics on Alpe d'Huez aren't representative of anything, neither good or bad.You’re welcome to point out where exactly he has done something that indicated he could win the Tour.
Yup. Pidcock has some amazing qualities as a rider that have been stated throughout this thread. He has shown zero for targeting GC since becoming a pro, never,mind targeting GC at le Tour. Given his characteristics, if he were to somehow suddenly be up there by the end of this year's race, I think most comments would be in another forum.I do not understand all this GC stuff. He has done classics, MTB, cyclocross etc. and now we are supposed to believe he will be able to do well in the GC? In Tour de Suisse he was nowhere - he is much off better off as a stagehunter, and he will need to properly prepare if he wants to do anything relevant here outside of stage wins.
If I were to rank the Ineos riders, I will go like this:
1. C-Rod
2. Bernal
3. Felipe M
4. Pidcock
OK fair enough. I agree. I referenced that because it is the best “evidence” I’ve seen that he has GC potential.I never said he could or would. I'm just pointing out that his antics on Alpe d'Huez aren't representative of anything, neither good or bad.
Yes, last year he was 16th with abysmal prep. This year it's better, so it wouldn't be outlandish for him to top ten.I doubt it happens this year, but once he puts his mind to it fully and his prep clicks, I think he can contend for the podium in a GT.
Why would it be outlandish for a young rider to progress from 16th to top ten in GC after a year, given that their prep for the race is also better?I think its pretty outlandish for him to top 10 unless he somehow gets gifted lots of time. But after today, it probably is a bit less outlandish with a few guys out of the race, but..
What was a 16th last year, 1 hour down or something? There's just a really, really big diff between a top-10 and a 16th in many GTs.Why would it be outlandish for a young rider to progress from 16th to top ten in GC after a year, given that their prep for the race is also better?