The fact he rides another discipline in the middle of the road season definitely has an impact on this, it's not a case of it might have an impact.
I think the point I'm trying to make here is being misconstrued, I am not agreeing nor disagreeing that he should be considered part of a top a 6, just that it is a pointless argument on the basis that the prerequisites to support a determination wether that be for or against are not in place to do so.
Ask any coach they will tell you exactly the same, you cannot go from 1 hour efforts on a completely different bike with a different ride position and subsequently different loads on muscle groups & different energy systems then just jump on a road bike and expect to be at peak performance at the upper echelons of the sport where the differences between 1st & 10th are miniscule. That's not my opinion, it's fact. Van der Poel himself will confirm this, as he has done many times in the past;
“It is not yet decided (to do both MTB and road),” van der Poel told
Olympics.com.
“We still have to make the puzzle.
It's a really difficult combination, especially if you want to do the Tour de France as well. We have a few different scenarios on the table, but we have to see which one we're going to choose. I'll have to make choices, and I still have to think about it now.”
“
It's difficult to mix for sure, but I think that the mountain bike is before the road race is an easier combination than the other way around,”