They are all looking more and more like Paris-Tours 2001 but Spotted **** only did 7 km solo after he dropped Durand
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
We are talking about one of the best TT'ers ever in the world, go fetch him when he is of.El Pistolero said:You don't think any of those solos are suspicious? Man, the moment he made every attack everyone knew he won.
Guess you do not understand the context. Museeuw's solo from TenBosse was ridiculous, compared to him Cancellara is a junior.El Pistolero said:What does Museeuw have to do with this?
Yes, I hate all BelgiumsEl Pistolero said:Perhaps you shouldn't let your own nationality influence with this discussion lol.
That would explain the placings of Ballan, Lovkwist and other big boys in the past. Perhaps the dirtroads also are a factor. But not for you of course. Even some sprinters do well there.El Pistolero said:Strade Bianche downhil, yeah perhaps you should go to Tuscany once and race there yourself. Let's see how you get over those hills if you weight over 82kg.
El Pistolero said:I don't know a single time trial specialist that can do what Cancellara does in classics(past and present), so there clearly must be something else that makes Cancellara capable of doing this - the only rider in the peloton. With links to Fuentes, Cecchini, Riis, Mapei, etc
I don't really see a connection with being a great time trial specialist and being a great classics rider.
spalco said:If this is true (I don't know, I'm not a cycling history buff), then clearly doping cannot be the answer though, since many classics riders in the past were undoubtedly doped up to the brim as well.
Unless Cancellara has access to some stuff, that nobody else uses, but that seems unlikely.
El Pistolero said:Alessandro Ballan weights 72 kg. Lofkvist 70 kg. Cancellara 82kg!
Are you that blind by your love of Cancellara? The guy has the weight of a sprinter yet climbs like an angel.
Museeuw was doping yes, in the 90s and early 2000s, and he admitted he took dope his entire career already. What does he have to do with Cancellara who's twice as ridiculous as far as solos are concerned?
Nor are all his solos on the Oude Kwaremont, so that's an odd thing to say.
I don't know a single time trial specialist that can do what Cancellara does in classics(past and present), so there clearly must be something else that makes Cancellara capable of doing this - the only rider in the peloton. With links to Fuentes, Cecchini, Riis, Mapei, etc
I don't really see a connection with being a great time trial specialist and being a great classics rider.
Ripper said:Good point on the weights. Ballan is listed as even lighter on the BMC site.
As for the bolded parts ... Canc certainly can drill it on the power climbs, but "climbs like an angel" is a bit over the top. He is nowhere in the mold of an LBL winner. And from a purely common sense point of view, being a great TT'r would actually be a very good tool for a classics rider. Canc has always 'fit' the power TT rider mode, very capable of prologue to longer TTs, with raw power that gets him over the helligen and cobbles very well, but not the power to weight to go over the longer bergs.
Having said this, please do keep in mind that I am not saying FC is clean now, nor in the past.
El Pistolero said:But I'm talking about the hills in a race like Strade Bianche though and the ones in Mendrisio. They are clearly much harder than anything riders have to face in the Ronde van Vlaanderen. Seems to be no problem for Cancellara though.
I don't know another heavy rider like Cancellara that could ever hope to race like that at a hilly WC and Strade Bianche. Mendrisio was ridiculous. At least Boonen's performance there was somewhat believable. (he was in the break)
Ripper said:I am just not a fan of hyperbole.
Yes, Mendrisio was silly. It is also pretty likely that FC weighed less at that time, given it was an objective from a long way out. And rider weights are not all that accurate, are they?
Anyhoo, my main point is being a good TT rider, especially a power TT rider, is actually good for being a classics rider. It's not the magic ticket, but it is a good thing. FC clearly trains not just for TT, but also for power to hit the hills, initiate the breakaway, etc. How he trains it is another story
man that was impressive Cancellara at Mendriso. He wanted the home WC.Ripper said:I am just not a fan of hyperbole.
Yes, Mendrisio was silly. It is also pretty likely that FC weighed less at that time, given it was an objective from a long way out. And rider weights are not all that accurate, are they?
Anyhoo, my main point is being a good TT rider, especially a power TT rider, is actually good for being a classics rider. It's not the magic ticket, but it is a good thing. FC clearly trains not just for TT, but also for power to hit the hills, initiate the breakaway, etc. How he trains it is another story
El Pistolero said:Well, I'm ignoring the old cycling, clearly Merckx for example could do everything.
Indurain could've been great in classics(just look at his 3 podiums at the WC road race), time trials and Grand Tours as well, but he was just not hungry enough I suppose. But we all know Indurain was clearly doping. Guys like that shouldn't be able to climb, too heavy.
Some riders just take more risk than others. Plenty of vet medication out there where there's no test for.
El Pistolero said:Like I said, Tony Martin is a better time trial specialist than Cancellara yet he never pulls ridiculous stunts like that.
Where exactly am I saying that Phil's 2011 isn't ridiculous? I said it was equally ridiculous as Cancellara in 2010/2013 and his climbing in 2008/2009. Learn to read. It's in this very thread for crying out loud. I also said Boonen's Roubaix in 2012 is similar to Cancellara's in 2010. But his Ronde wins for me are much less suspicious because he didn't overpower everyone with apparent ease.
No crazy transformation in his skills? Man, did you watch any of the Flemish classics before 2010 or were you too busy looking for Euskaltel?
Besides, Cancellara was doping from early on. I think Phil was cleaner than Cancellara for most of his career yes. Don't you? Mapei, Cecchini, Riis, Fuentes, accusations of Hamilton, etc
Same goes for your little friend Valverde who was doping the moment he touched a bike. Perhaps the Sky boys just started doping later and that's why you see a bigger transformation. But there's still an obvious transformation with Cancellara in the Flemish classics in 2010.
I don't move goalposts by the way.
So, let me get this straight, when someone calls you on your BS one is a fan of Cancellara? You clearly are out of arguments, you used the same line of 'reasoning' with Libertine yesterday, people do not fall for that Pistolero.El Pistolero said:Alessandro Ballan weights 72 kg. Lofkvist 70 kg. Cancellara 82kg!
Are you that blind by your love of Cancellara? The guy has the weight of a sprinter yet climbs like an angel.
Museeuw was doping yes, in the 90s and early 2000s, and he admitted he took dope his entire career already. What does he have to do with Cancellara who's twice as ridiculous as far as solos are concerned?
Nor are all his solos on the Oude Kwaremont, so that's an odd thing to say.
I don't know a single time trial specialist that can do what Cancellara does in classics(past and present), so there clearly must be something else that makes Cancellara capable of doing this - the only rider in the peloton. With links to Fuentes, Cecchini, Riis, Mapei, etc
I don't really see a connection with being a great time trial specialist and being a great classics rider.
You are really a funny guy, respectfull too.El Pistolero said:And I'm not even going to bother to read the entire post without proper paragraphs and alineas, sorry mate.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:So, let me get this straight, when someone calls you on your BS one is a fan of Cancellara? You clearly are out of arguments, you used the same line of 'reasoning' with Libertine yesterday, people do not fall for that Pistolero.
The last not normal performances in the classics were all by hand of Taus and of course the motorbikedoping by Cancellara in 2010.You are really a funny guy, respectfull too.
The fridge in the blue trees said:Boonen: Starts at US Postal
Cancellara: Mapei
Gilbert: FdJ
Weeeelll, I guess the doping suspicion in the case of Boonen must be the hightest. If one of the three was doped to the gills for his whole career, probably Boonen the best bet? Agree?
El Pistolero said:And why do you think Mapei is less suspicious than US Postal? They're both dirty as hell. Of course both of them will have doped early in their careers, but that is not to say their programs are equal.
The fridge in the blue trees said:Aha....
1. I wrote why I think Mapei was less suspicious than US Postal. So don't ask, read. And if you didn't understand it... oh well.
2. Not equal, interesting, let's see where that leads us.
Ok, you're implying that the Mapei classic doping programm is better than the US Postal doping program?
If yes, let's think further.. where did Boonen go from USPS? Oh, Mapei. Just without Mapei as a sponsor, without Squinzis anti doping stand. So free hand for Lefevere, no naive Squinzi in the background who wanted to "save the young riders from doping" and had Sassi look after them.
Then I suppose you would agree that from whenever Boonen joined Team Ex mapei, 04 or 03, he has had the BEST dopingprogramm for classic riders at his disposal?
The fridge in the blue trees said:No, don't agree. 80+? He wasn't 80+ in Mendrisio. When Cancellara prepares, he prepares 100%. And he doesn't actually target all that much per season. Never even tried to carry his form into Amstel... Maybe feels he would need to be closer to his "Mendrisio weight" than to his Roubaix weight?
Heaviest rider that can compete in hilly races? Ok. And what does that prove again? SAme as before, nothing. One guy has to be the heaviest..
So, for the last time and then I will let you swim in your own pool, Cancellara wins Strade Bianchi twice, as a big fellow, on a surface that suits him - given him ending up top ten every time he enters - is THE sign of doping? Cause, every other 'argument' you have posted has been debunked this Strade Bianche is THE proof?El Pistolero said:So you manipulate fake data to support your argument and then you say I'm running out of arguments?
You say Cancellara is not the only heavy rider out there in Strade Bianche and give Ballan and Lofkvist as examples. Yet they're 10-12 kgs lighter than Cancellara.
So yeah, my reasoning is that you're blinded by your love of Cancellara or you don't know how Indian numbers work. 82 > 72 > 70.
So which is it, are you a fanboy or just plain ignorant about the weight of riders you use in your own arguments? Or maybe you just suffer from dyscalculia, fair enough.
Basic knowledge, Lefevre got kicked out around 2000 because he couldnt agree with Squinzi's [new] look on doping. Never heard Squinzi complain on the Mapei 1-2-3 at Roubaix.Lefevere was not part of the Mapei team in 2001-2002. Basic knowledge you should know
El Pistolero said:Fishy Cancellara performances:
- Mendrisio WC
- Strade Bianche
- Beijing Olympics
The fridge in the blue trees said:Strade Bianche? Yep, there he's very likely at 80 or so. But then Strade Bianche isn't LBL or Lombardia. And there he's at 80, ok. Not Mendrisio. Not Beijing. The TT? Completely unheard of to win a TT weighting less than 80 kg...
And of course there needs to be a dirtiest one. i thought we had agreed on Boonen though? I mean, his history is clear.
US Postal
Quick step, with the dirty Lefevere coming back, mixed with the dirty Farm Frites.
Can't beat that really.