Tour de France 2018 stage 6: Brest > Mûr de Bretagne 181 km

Page 12 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
Re: Re:

tobydawq said:
Valv.Piti said:
Valverde didnt have the best of legs. His sprint was pretty meh despite winning in the group, he didn't have what it took to beat Martin today I think.

How was that meh? He obliterated them completely in a headwind sprint.

He should just have gone with Dan Martin, that shouldn't be too hard to have realised.

He almost certainly thought it was crazy to go that early into a headwind and if Martin hadn’t been super strong he’d have been right. Waiting to beat Alaphilippe in a sprint was playing the percentages.
 
Jul 2, 2013
661
25
10,030
Re:

woodburn said:
Dumoulin now one second behind Froome.

Landa shown finishing with top contenders but did not see him.

Landa was there, finising last in the group behind Latour.
 
Mar 15, 2011
2,760
71
11,580
Re: Re:

silvergrenade said:
DFA123 said:
More Strides than Rides said:
Am I the only one not seeing anything out of the ordinary in the riders using cars to make their way back?

Maybe I wasn't paying attention but it looked pretty status quo from both Sunweb and Astana
I always thought there was a clear distinction between drafting through the cars on your way back to the peloton (commissaires turn blind eye) and following your own team car for a significant period of time, which is detached from the rest of the train (blatant cheating).

Dumoulin did the latter, and probably saved 10-20 seconds as a result.
Hoping for a penalty..
That was so blatant it wasnt even funny.

I mean, yeah, it was clear as day. Not denying it happened.

I used the words "out of the ordinary" and "status quo". I always assumed chasing behind cars, even your own team car, was part of the deal. And frankly, I'm fine with it.

Finally, to compare it to Nibali is ridiculous. The guys today were at least peddling their own bikes...
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,157
28,180
Never thought that stage would matter much. Apart from Martin's strong attack there wasn't much to talk about. Drafting gets penalized when they feel like penalizing someone it seems. The cobbles will be much more interesting.I think.
 
Mar 31, 2015
10,192
4,951
28,180
So now for GC-ish candidates it's:
Thomas
TJ 3"
Jungels 15"
Uran 42"
Bala 48"
Majka 49"
Fugslang and Porte 50"
Landa 55"
Froome and Yates 59"
Dumoulin 1:00
Nibali 1:05
Roglic 1:14
Quintana 2:07
 
May 3, 2015
4,833
4,404
21,180
Re:

Brullnux said:
So now for GC-ish candidates it's:
Thomas
TJ 3"
Jungels 15"
Uran 42"
Bala 48"
Majka 49"
Fugslang and Porte 50"
Landa 55"
Froome and Yates 59"
Dumoulin 1:00
Nibali 1:05
Roglic 1:14
Quintana 2:07

TJ in but no Bardet? :D
 
Jul 2, 2013
661
25
10,030
Re:

Brullnux said:
So now for GC-ish candidates it's:
Thomas
TJ 3"
Jungels 15"
Uran 42"
Bala 48"
Majka 49"
Fugslang and Porte 50"
Landa 55"
Froome and Yates 59"
Dumoulin 1:00
Nibali 1:05
Roglic 1:14
Quintana 2:07

No Bardet? He's at 1'42"
 
Jun 25, 2015
1,701
2
5,485
Re: Re:

Escarabajo said:
Matteo. said:
silvergrenade said:
Matteo. said:
+5s Froome
nothing
Actually expected Froome to lose 10s..
He was okay.
same. i think he'll repeat the giro going in top shape next week
If he is still not in shape he needs to do it quickly because next week is awfully hard.
already now he looks better than at the beginning of the giro. we'll see , the double is impossible to predict now
 
Apr 16, 2009
17,600
6,854
28,180
Re:

movingtarget said:
Never thought that stage would matter much. Apart from Martin's strong attack there wasn't much to talk about. Drafting gets penalized when they feel like penalizing someone it seems. The cobbles will be much more interesting.I think.
We don't know the effects on time and energy of this stage until the third week. So hard to say if time losses are insignificant.
 
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
By the way, the posters who think that GC climbers who skip the Ardennes would be competitive there and that there’s a weak field at those races should watch today’s stage again. GC climbers with no punch are not top favourites for hilly races when up against the actual puncheurs and climber/puncheurs. The guys who compete for those races are in fact the best at punchy climbs and Martin, Valverde, Alaphilippe etc will kill non-punchy climbers when it comes to the anaerobic stuff.
 
May 4, 2014
1,155
103
10,680
Thomas 0:00:00
Jungels 0:00:15
Uran 0:00:42
Valverde 0:00:48
Majka 0:00:49
Porte 0:00:50
Fuglsang 0:00:50
Landa 0:00:52
Froome 0:00:59
Yates 0:00:59
Dumoulin 0:01:00
Nibali 0:01:05
Roglic 0:01:14
Mollema 0:01:15
Kruijswijk 0:01:23
Martin 0:01:25
Bernal 0:01:27
Bardet 0:01:42
Zakarin 0:01:59
Quintana 0:02:07
 
Mar 31, 2015
10,192
4,951
28,180
Re: Re:

fantomas said:
Brullnux said:
So now for GC-ish candidates it's:
Thomas
TJ 3"
Jungels 15"
Uran 42"
Bala 48"
Majka 49"
Fugslang and Porte 50"
Landa 55"
Froome and Yates 59"
Dumoulin 1:00
Nibali 1:05
Roglic 1:14
Quintana 2:07

No Bardet? He's at 1'42"
He wasn't on pcs and I remembered the gap between Quintana and Nibali to be 59, but not Bardey
 
May 12, 2015
1,238
464
11,580
Re: Re:

franic said:
Red Rick said:
Laplaz said:
How much time Froome lost?
Few seconds

Froome lets Thomas worry about seconds
He's probably thinking about minutes himself
He’s going to pull out aNother Chiappucci-like attack (I guess I cant say a Landis in this section of the forum). What an amazing rider he is :cry:
Why would Chiappucci be permissible but Landis objectionable?
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,157
28,180
Re: Re:

Escarabajo said:
movingtarget said:
Never thought that stage would matter much. Apart from Martin's strong attack there wasn't much to talk about. Drafting gets penalized when they feel like penalizing someone it seems. The cobbles will be much more interesting.I think.
We don't know the effects on time and energy of this stage until the third week. So hard to say if time losses are insignificant.

Yes the last two stages were still hard. Porte said yesterday's stage was by far the hardest of the race.
 
Re: Re:

ppanther92 said:
Brullnux said:
So now for GC-ish candidates it's:
Thomas
TJ 3"
Jungels 15"
Uran 42"
Bala 48"
Majka 49"
Fugslang and Porte 50"
Landa 55"
Froome and Yates 59"
Dumoulin 1:00
Nibali 1:05
Roglic 1:14
Quintana 2:07

TJ in but no Bardet? :D

Dan Martin was 6th in th Tour last year riding with injury
And we can see how strong he is today and yet you leave him out

Usual rubbish bias ...
 
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
UAE’s season not looking too bad now. Six wins in the last five weeks including Martin’s Tour and Dauphine stages and Ulissi’s Susie’s stage.

Its still remarkable how weak the team they’ve sent to support Martin and Kristoff is though. What they are spending their budget on is a mystery on the same scale as Katusha and Cofidis spending decisions.
 
Mar 19, 2009
9,892
1,790
20,680
Re: Re:

HelloDolly said:
ppanther92 said:
Brullnux said:
So now for GC-ish candidates it's:
Thomas
TJ 3"
Jungels 15"
Uran 42"
Bala 48"
Majka 49"
Fugslang and Porte 50"
Landa 55"
Froome and Yates 59"
Dumoulin 1:00
Nibali 1:05
Roglic 1:14
Quintana 2:07

TJ in but no Bardet? :D

Dan Martin was 6th in th Tour last year riding with injury
And we can see how strong he is today and yet you leave him out

Usual rubbish bias ...
Several guys missing. Bardet, Martin, Zaka, Mollema...I wouldn't take it so personally, probably just an oversight.
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,157
28,180
Re:

Zinoviev Letter said:
UAE’s season not looking too bad now. Six wins in the last five weeks including Martin’s Tour and Dauphine stages and Ulissi’s Susie’s stage.

Its still remarkable how weak the team they’ve sent to support Martin and Kristoff is though. What they are spending their budget on is a mystery on the same scale as Katusha and Cofidis spending decisions.

Maybe they have the best hotels and a celebrity chef ?