Tour de France 2020 | Stage 16 (La Tour-du-Pin - Villard-de-Lans, 164 km)

Page 10 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Very much agree with this. Its obviously one of the hardest climbs ridden, but the problem is stating that "well, former rider, he knows a lot more than any of us" us is just flat out laughable in my opinion. That said, Chris Anker is obviously a much better analyst than Flecha, but him saying that doesnt mean anything to me. I can see myself that Loze is an extremely hard climb, but the insane gaps some might expect most likely wont be there as the climb is constructed in a very back-loaded way. Meribel in itself is a relatively easy climb for the best climbers in the peloton, and then you have those 5-6 very hard kms in altitude which obviously will make a difference.

And yes, I do think Portet is a harder climb and I do think that Agnello is a harder climb. I could even argue that Loze isnt even the hardest climb of the day. Its obviously close, Loze is up there, but my point just is that its so wrong just to take everything that these former riders say for granted without looking at the stuff yourself.
Ultimately it's all down to the definition of "hard". I don't really think 20ish km 7% ish climbs where the last 5km average 10% aren't that rare or unique, they're just almost always passes. In fact, Col de la Loze is a pass and would much better be used as such. In the Tour, at the very least I think the Agnello east side is significantly harder, primarily because the first part of the Loze isn' hard enough to drill it completely and you're automatically left waiting until the final 5km, while the Agnello has like 9km of 10% between 1800m and 2700m of altitude.

I think Lago Serru is the closest comparison in the Giro, (if they go all the way to the top it's clearly harder/more decisive), and for the Vuelta I think it's Bola del Mundo and Cuitu Negru. Bola I don't remember if they actually did the hard side of Navacerrada or not, and Cuitu Negru, while lower, is also way, way steeper in the end.

Also, the good old 'you think you know better than that former pro?'. The answer for me is typically yes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
What do you mean? If commentators are saying its the hardest climb the Tour has EVER done, obviously people wont expect minimal gaps.

You are - as usual - assuming stuff that nobody has expressed, like for instance that I believe anything commentators say blindly, as if I was some sort of moron.

It's a comment with no other purpose than insulting me.

That you then decide to instantly start whining, when I dare to respond in kind, really just makes you come across pathetic.
 
Ultimately it's all down to the definition of "hard". I don't really think 20ish km 7% ish climbs where the last 5km average 10% aren't that rare or unique, they're just almost always passes. In fact, Col de la Loze is a pass and would much better be used as such. In the Tour, at the very least I think the Agnello east side is significantly harder, primarily because the first part of the Loze isn' hard enough to drill it completely and you're automatically left waiting until the final 5km, while the Agnello has like 9km of 10% between 1800m and 2700m of altitude.

I think Lago Serru is the closest comparison in the Giro, (if they go all the way to the top it's clearly harder/more decisive), and for the Vuelta I think it's Bola del Mundo and Cuitu Negru. Bola I don't remember if they actually did the hard side of Navacerrada or not, and Cuitu Negru, while lower, is also way, way steeper in the end.

Also, the good old 'you think you know better than that former pro?'. The answer for me is typically yes.
Imagine if the Tour would use the Agnel from the Italian side and finish in Saint-Veran afterwards...
Honestly, I don't know how hard Col de la Loze is, moderate altitude doesn't really bother me andI've done climbs that have a higher average gradient for longer, I'd have to climb it.
 
Imagine if the Tour would use the Agnel from the Italian side and finish in Saint-Veran afterwards...
Honestly, I don't know how hard Col de la Loze is, moderate altitude doesn't really bother me andI've done climbs that have a higher average gradient for longer, I'd have to climb it.
Saint Veran?

There's the bottom of some climb to some observatory or some *** at like 2950m.

Also I forgot I had Giau east and Tre cimi on my shortlist of comparable climbs.
 
Imagine if the Tour would use the Agnel from the Italian side and finish in Saint-Veran afterwards...
Honestly, I don't know how hard Col de la Loze is, moderate altitude doesn't really bother me andI've done climbs that have a higher average gradient for longer, I'd have to climb it.
Yeah and you are an Italian coming from the dolomites. That's an unfair comparison ;)
 
You are - as usual - assuming stuff that nobody has expressed, like for instance that I believe anything commentators say blindly, as if I was some sort of moron.

It's a comment with no other purpose than insulting me.

That you then decide to instantly start whining, when I dare to respond in kind, really just makes you come across pathetic.
You are the one making the former rider >>>> random forum member point. As I have said now on numerous occasions, I dont give a rats ass about such logic and I really dont wanna spend more time on discussing this topic with you.
 
Saint Veran?

There's the bottom of some climb to some observatory or some *** at like 2950m.
Descent the French side of the Agnel until Molines-en-Queyras, then the last 6km of this one.
SaintVeran.gif
 
  • Love
Reactions: Red Rick
Navacerrada before Bola is something like 18km at 5% average. Loze before the hard part is 17km at 7%.

Cuitu Negru is nothing special before the final 3km except for 1 very steep km at the end of Pajares

And regarding today it seems easier-hard-hard is not the best order for 3 days in the mountains
 
Imagine if the Tour would use the Agnel from the Italian side and finish in Saint-Veran afterwards...
Honestly, I don't know how hard Col de la Loze is, moderate altitude doesn't really bother me andI've done climbs that have a higher average gradient for longer, I'd have to climb it.
I always get so jealous hearing the climbs people in other countries ride. In Ireland, our hardest climb is probably Mount Leinster... 13km @ 6%!
 
Now that fits perfectly
Pic_du_Ch%C3%A2teau-Renard_Saint-V%C3%A9ran_profile.jpg
Ok, that looks hard.
Yes, Tre Cime from Auronzo is really hard, the first part before Misurina is also really exposed to the sun and it gets pretty hot.
I think the climb to Oberbozen/Soprabolzano would be the hardest climb in an actual race, compared to all the other climbs that I've done. That first km at over 19% with ramps up to 30% would blow the race into pieces.
47382826_10205283152954166_7872076773213601792_n.jpg
 
Navacerrada before Bola is something like 18km at 5% average. Loze before the hard part is 17km at 7%.

Cuitu Negru is nothing special before the final 3km except for 1 very steep km at the end of Pajares

And regarding today it seems easier-hard-hard is not the best order for 3 days in the mountains
Think today was designed for the break and the next 2 stages should work as a pair