Philippsen is really one of the less convincing "dominant sprinters" in recent Tours. There is usually one guy who wins the majority of the sprints and that's clearly him this time but I'm really not sold on him yet.
Last edited:
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
If Binny doesn't ease up, he'll spend the next three months in the hospital.
??Philippsen is really one of the least convincing "dominant sprinters" in recent Tours? There is usually one guy who wins the majority of the sprints and that's clearly him this time but I'm really not sold on him yet.
If I were king of the cycling world, I would relegate him. If they keep letting this stuff go, it's going to keep happening, and eventually someone's going to get really hurt.Rewatching the sprint, I could see Philipsen getting relegated.
He definitely shuts the door on Girmay.
You don't have to, you Choose toNyet. If they make us pay, there should be no commercials.
Exactly, deviated from his sprint and endangered another rider. Had Grimay not reacted to the move he would have ended up in the barriers at 60kmh+.
Maybe he's less of a "pure" sprinter (he's been building a bit of a classics resume) but if he isn't dominant surely there must be someone who is close. But is there?Philippsen is really one of the least convincing "dominant sprinters" in recent Tours? There is usually one guy who wins the majority of the sprints and that's clearly him this time but I'm really not sold on him yet.
You act as if sprinters never touch each other.If Binny doesn't ease up, he'll spend the next three months in the hospital.
All faces look frustrated after a sprint finish, except for that of the winner.A few frustrated looking faces behind Phillipsen and I don't think it's just about getting beaten. That's his second victory that looked borderline legal.
You act as if sprinters never touch each other.
Basically you literally can't have a better leadout than MvdP because typically leadouts tend to be sprinters themselves who just lack some top end speed, not guys who are physiological freaksWell in terms of pure speed, he has won against anyone so far, but he obviously has a lot to thank Mathieu for. I think that's the best leadout rider I have seen or at least can remember, because god knows I don't really remember that stuff.
I can't be mad at that domination at all though, he seems like a nice lad and he's by far the most versatile of the top sprinters considering he has finished second in Roubaix. That's truly the mark of a very well rounded rider when he can also sprint like this, so Im a fan of course.
I'm also not sure about how much he actually "endangered" Girmay, as I've seen way worse moves in many sprint finishes, and of course fighting for positions is part of being a sprinter. But at least we shouldn't act like Philipsen just follows van der Poel's wheel or just tries to get to Cavendish's wheel etc. To me it's clear that he changes his lane on purpose to impede others in their sprint. He is clever enough to do it at the edge of what is allowed (or let's better say "of what is tolerated"), though.I dunno about "endangered", but he definitely went from the extreme left, to the extreme right, and impeeded Girmey from launching his sprint... he may even have made contact with his front wheel.
In two out of three wins he made very questionable moves that easily could have seen hin relegated, he is benefiting massively from insanely good leadouts by MvdP and currently his opposition is pretty meh.
He went across the road to take Cavendish's wheel, not to squeeze Girmay into the barrier. I'm pretty sure Girmay could see it happen from a mile away and is mostly frustrated that he didn't manage to get ahead of Philippsen in time.No he doesn't, he is just pointing to why it was an unfair sprint by Philipsen, which appears to be in clear conflict with the rules on "staying in your lane".
When you watch the replay, Philipsen launched his sprint from the extreme left of the road, then went clear across the road to close the gap to the right of Cavendish on Girmay and squeezing him into the barrier, before then switching direction again and passing Cavendish on the left.
It's one of the wildest cases of deviation we have ever seen in a sprint, without it resulting in penalty - which I think is what many find surprising.
I'm also not sure about how much he actually "endangered" Girmay, as I've seen way worse moves in many sprint finishes, and of course fighting for positions is part of being a sprinter. But at least we shouldn't act like Philipsen just follows van der Poel's wheel or just tries to get to Cavendish's wheel etc. To me it's clear that he changes his lane on purpose to impede others in their sprint. He is clever enough to do it at the edge of what is allowed (or let's better say "of what is tolerated"), though.
To me it's clear that the sun revolves around the earth. I mean just look at it, it's kinda obviousI'm also not sure about how much he actually "endangered" Girmay, as I've seen way worse moves in many sprint finishes, and of course fighting for positions is part of being a sprinter. But at least we shouldn't act like Philipsen just follows van der Poel's wheel or just tries to get to Cavendish's wheel etc. To me it's clear that he changes his lane on purpose to impede others in their sprint. He is clever enough to do it at the edge of what is allowed (or let's better say "of what is tolerated"), though.
Did you notice how Philipsen didn't say the same about Girmay?Philipsen said he'd like to see Cav win...will he be able to return to Belgium now...he's going to need a disguise and armed protection.
He went across the road to take Cavendish's wheel, not to squeeze Girmay into the barrier. I'm pretty sure Girmay could see it happen from a mile away and is mostly frustrated that he didn't manage to get ahead of Philippsen in time.
"Before then switching direction again and passing Cavendish on the left"
So the faster guy should stay behind the slower rider in front of him, because otherwise he would be switching direction?
What do you mean "close the gap to the right of Cavendish"? Cav himself closed the door on the right side. If Cav hadn't done that, Girmay could have tried to pass on Cav's right.When you watch the replay, Philipsen launched his sprint from the extreme left of the road, then went clear across the road to close the gap to the right of Cavendish on Girmay and squeezing him into the barrier, before then switching direction again and passing Cavendish on the left.
It's one of the wildest cases of deviation we have ever seen in a sprint, without it resulting in penalty - which I think is what many find surprising.
Have a laugh, but happy that cycling logic is confirmed yet again.Final kms look dangerous, so there will be no crashes.
Cycling logic.
It's clear to me because he has changed langes in every single sprint finish so far. First stage win, I give him the benefit of the doubt and that the barriers were designed in a bad way. Second stage win, he overtakes van der Poel and then goes completely to the right (not to get someone's wheel) instead of sprinting in his lane to the finish line, because that way he get's slightly in front of Ewan who has to go to the left to pass him. Today, he deviated from his line again. If you don't see a pattern...To me it's clear that the sun revolves around the earth. I mean just look at it, it's kinda obvious