With the Paris Olympics this close I think a lot of guys will consider it if the final 5 days are all mountain/GC days.I don't think so. Very few riders would abandon the Tour voluntarily.
Which is all the more reason to do it.
With the Paris Olympics this close I think a lot of guys will consider it if the final 5 days are all mountain/GC days.I don't think so. Very few riders would abandon the Tour voluntarily.
There could be, but that wouldn't fit with the rumours of the article in question.
Once again, this time not translated:
"Trois jours ou plus dans les Hautes-Alpes et l'Ubaye
Reste donc à imaginer le scénario: cela pourrait prendre cette forme par exemple
Mercredi 17 juillet : Une arrivée à Super-Dévoluy en provenance du pied du Mont ventoux?
Jeudi 18 juillet : Une étape Gap-Barcelonnette? Certains espèrent voir le Tour franchir pour la première fois le col de Moissières...
Vendredi 19 juillet : Une étape Embrun-Isola 2000 (ou Auron) via les cols de Vars et de Restefond/ la Bonette ?"
You can have a non-mountain stage that will be a pure breakaway stage, but of high quality, by using the same roads as in P-N:
![]()
not everything make sense here. That means at least 5 GC days in a row. With Mont Ventoux before as they suggest in the article even 6 days. And risk of riders preparing for the olympics will leave early as well as riders that have nothing more to fight for. Besides Moissieres make no sense in a stage to Barcelonette.
So:
1. 17-07 Noyer + Super-Dévoluy, not super hard, but a nice final of the stage
18-07 Gap - Barcelonette (with the three colls, Allos, Champs, Cayolle)
19-07 transistion stage
20-07 Nice - Couillole
21-07 ITT
2. 17-07 Noyer + Super-Dévoluy, not super hard, but a nice final of the stage
18-07 Gap - Barcelonette as a transistion stage
19-07 Embrum - Aulon/Isola (Vars and Bonette)
20-07 Nice - Couillole
21-07 ITT
3. The super-devoluy stage is not at the end of the tour, but in the beginning.
stage 4: Mont-Cenis - Valloire/Vallmeir
stage 5: Briancon/Embrun - Super Devoluy
I don't know anything about the Moutiere climb...... afaik it has never been used in the Tour so I don't have anything to go on...... there are some on the forum here who have probably ridden the climb or nearby area.Is there actually space at the top of the Moutiere for a Granon style finish? Could be Vars, Bonette, Moutiere
There could be, but that wouldn't fit with the rumours of the article in question.
Once again, this time not translated:
"Trois jours ou plus dans les Hautes-Alpes et l'Ubaye
Reste donc à imaginer le scénario: cela pourrait prendre cette forme par exemple
Mercredi 17 juillet : Une arrivée à Super-Dévoluy en provenance du pied du Mont ventoux?
Jeudi 18 juillet : Une étape Gap-Barcelonnette? Certains espèrent voir le Tour franchir pour la première fois le col de Moissières...
Vendredi 19 juillet : Une étape Embrun-Isola 2000 (ou Auron) via les cols de Vars et de Restefond/ la Bonette ?"
It's on Google Street View. There's nothing like the parking at Granon. It looks like there's plenty of flattish or very shallow sloped but somewhat rough terrain at the side of the road until 200m before the summit, but I'm not sure if the wide angle lens perspective is deceiving me and that's not really usableIs there actually space at the top of the Moutiere for a Granon style finish? Could be Vars, Bonette, Moutiere
Col de La Loze was in l'Avenir the year before IIRC? I feel we may see it used like that before we see it in the Tour.Just because I went down that rabbit hole again, when do we expect La Tougnete to be included in a Tour route? And maybe more importantly, does anyone have any knowledge on when the Meribel side might be built and what the exact route might be? All the things you could play around with combining Loze and Tougnete have made my mouth water ever since I first heard about it.
Personally, i'm more interested in a return to col du granon, even if tougnete is great.Well, after the Tour visited Col de la Loze this year, the earliest we can expect a stage there is in 2025, yet more likely 2026. If this would be connected with the Tougnete, a Val Thorens MTF also seems improbable until then.
Is Tougnete a hard climb........ distance and gradient wise??
It's basically Super Planche des Belles Filles on top of the first three-quarters of Val Thorens. So not far off Loze overall, but as an MTF it has the same issue as Super Planche des Belles Filles in that the brutal ramp to the line is a likely deterrent of earlier attacks.Is Tougnete a hard climb........ distance and gradient wise??
Granon is just a stage likely to be about the HC MTF. And there's a lot of good, hard climbs for that. Especially in the Alps.Personally, i'm more interested in a return to col du granon, even if tougnete is great.
That looks a lot harder than Val-Thorens. Group of riders will be reduced dramatically before they even touch the hard part. Just put in perspective that Pogacar was detached before they even got to the hard part in Loze.![]()
This is the same as Val Thorens until Les Menuires. Must be noted that you can take a harder profile of Val Thorens for the first ~15km or whatever it is.
I think if you descend the other way they don't go all the way until 2410m but it's like 2360 so they take half of that huge ramp.
If the TT was flat, the result would be the same.Here's something trendy that I hope they drop - these mixed semi-climb ITTs. The problem is that the riders who are good at them are just the GC guys anyway, so I think it doesn't really have much more effect than just exploding the time gaps that already exist, rather than give guys a chance to make up time. It's basically a "rich get richer" stage where the riders most likely to win are the ones most suited to them.
Flat ITTs are a different skill than "GC rider" so the results can be much more interesting.
It might not be next year. It's not that I think Remco can challenge Pog and Vingo for an entire Tour, but I could definitely see him taking a lead if there is a proper flat TT.If the TT was flat, the result would be the same.
Well, I think it's a climb so hard that it couldn't help but create gaps larger than SPdBF. Those kind of rankings are always debatable but cyclingcols has this climb as their 2nd hardest in all of France, behind only Telegraphe+Galibier and in front of Col de la Loze. I think an entire km at 11%, at that altitude and after that much climbing could do enormous damage, even if there is an even steeper ramp still to come.It's basically Super Planche des Belles Filles on top of the first three-quarters of Val Thorens. So not far off Loze overall, but as an MTF it has the same issue as Super Planche des Belles Filles in that the brutal ramp to the line is a likely deterrent of earlier attacks.
![]()
If the TT was flat, the result would be the same.
Probably van aert would lose 1 min and half instead of 2 min and 51 s, probably cavagna would lose 1 min and half, instead of 3 min, probably kung would lose 1 min instead of 3 min, but the winner would be the same. The gaps are too high and specially vingegaard and also pogacar can do very well in a flat TT.The time differences would have been significantly smaller.
Maybe with a TT in the first week he could gain a little advantage( and i have some doubts about that), but in the third week it would be very difficult.It might not be next year. It's not that I think Remco can challenge Pog and Vingo for an entire Tour, but I could definitely see him taking a lead if there is a proper flat TT.